Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: railways act 1989 section 198 · Page 1 of about 94 results (0.069 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 14 1999

Brij Bhal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-14-1999

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 198; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2000MP265

which stood dismissed by order dated 11-5-99.3. After the controversy in that regard was put to rest, the Railways published a fresh advertisement dated 14-4-1999 inviting applications for grant of the two licences. Pursuant to the said … in the case of State of U.P. v. Dharmander Prasad Singh, AIR 1989 SC 997 wherein their Lordships expressed thus (at page 1010) :'Judicial review … of the candidates was called for the interview and that clearly spells out mala fide and such an act of mala fide vitiates the selection. It is also putforth by him that the interview was not held … state that the petitioner was working in Delhi sometime in the year 1980. This fact has been taken note of by the Screening Committee and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 2001

M.T. and Sons and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-09-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 198

Reported in : AIR2001MP214

further prayer has been made to declare that the increase of 12% of the licence fees by the Railways is unjust, unreasonable and arbitrary and to restrain the respondents from collecting at the increased rate.2. Sans unnecessary … approached the Railway Authorities seeking permission to increase the strength of their staff for expansion of their business activities, but the same has not been allowed. It has been urged that the petitioners are under obligation to … rider Driver of motor cycle carrying two pillion riders in violation of Section 128 Held, A plain reading of Section 128 of the Act would … the petitioner tried to impress upon this Court that the circular of 1987 providing the guidelines for fixing the licence fee has not been kept

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2012

Mrs. Shanti Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-24-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

The claimants i.e. wife, three daughters and one son have filed claim petition under Section 125 of the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Railways Act') seeking compensation for death of Rajesh aged 27 years doing job … Insurance Company ORDER (24/07/2012) Claimants have filed this appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 being aggrieved by the judgment dated 24/10/2007 passed by Railway Claims Tribunal, Ghaziabad Bench, Bhopal in Original Application

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 25 2015

Brahm Dev Gupta Vs. Container Corporation of India and Anr

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-25-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act). This FN contained the terms and conditions which clearly mentioned that the terms were governed by the Railways Act, 1989. Any loss or damage, if caused to the cargo shall be dealt with under the said Act. It … customer.” 18 The Indian Railway Rules published on 26.09.2006 by the Ministry of Railways under its powers under Section 198 of the said Act have also been perused. „Operator‟ has been defined under Rule 2 (b) to mean

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2026

Suman Devi & Ors. vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-01-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

deceased was neither a bona fide passenger nor the alleged accident an “untoward incident” as defined under the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”). FAO 156/2023 Page 1 of 43. Briefly stated, the facts of the … Rakshit Tyagi and Mr.Kunal Dixit, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT1. The present appeal has been preferred under Section 23 of theRailway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, assailing the judgment dated 31.10.2022 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, … appeal has been preferred under Section 23 of theRailway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, assailing the judgment dated 31.10.2022 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 18 2005

Union of India (Uoi), Represented by the Secretary, Railway Board, Min ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-18-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Administrative Tribunal (Salaries and Allowances and Conditions of Service of Chairman, Vice-Chairman and Members) Rules, 1985 - Rule 15A; ;Railway Claims Tribunal (Salaries and allowances and conditions of Service of Chairman, Vice Chairman and Members) Rules, 1989 - Rules 3, 4 to 14 and 15; ;High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) (Amendment) Act, 1999; ;Bar Councils Act and the Original Side Rules; ;High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 - Sections 2(1); High Court Judges (Travelling Allowances) Rules, 1956; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 217, 229 and 235 to 237

Reported in : 2005(3)CTC703

Chairman, Railway Claims Tribunal, Delhi under the order dated 20-01-1995 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Railways. The appointment was for a period of 5 years from the date of his joining the Railway Claims … allowances and conditions of Service of Chairman, Vice Chairman and Members) Rules, 1989 as amended from time to time.(b). The second respondent, after demitting his … Service of Chairman, Vice Chairman and Members) Rules, 1989 as amended from time to time.(b). The second … read with para 9 of Part-I of Schedule I to the High Court Judges ( Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 and as amended by Central Act 7 of 199 9 at Rs.51,190 per annum from 1-6-1998 and … Part D of Second Schedule to the Constitution of India read with Section 2(1)(c)(i) of the High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, 19 54.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2021

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-05-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

v. Jalgaon 158 AIR1967SC295(para 10, 27, 60 and64) 159 (1969) 1 SCC325(paras 7 to 9, 11 and13) 160 1989 (2) Supp. SCC201(paras 8, 9 and13) 161 (2002) 3 SCC496(para10) 162 AIR1961SC1519163 AIR1991SC1216(paras 6 to10) 164 (supra at … 60 and64) 159 (1969) 1 SCC325(paras 7 to 9, 11 and13) 160 1989 (2) Supp. SCC201(paras 8, 9 and13) 161 (2002) 3 SCC496(para10) 162 AIR1961SC1519163 … Parliament commensurate with modern safety norms; and (xiv) To preserve the built heritage by not undertaking aggressive reconstruction activity on graded heritage structures on which only minimum renovation measures are permissible in law.9. Before we begin the … 229 d) Procedure during decision- 230-265 making process and Public Hearing under Section 11A e) Quasi Legislative Function 266-273 f) Post change in land use

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1996

Shankar Lal Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-15-1996

Subject : Civil

General Rules, under Part I of Goods Tariff No. 39, issued under Section 77-B (4) of the Indian Railways Act, 1890.4. Learned Counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the aforementioned Rule has been interpreted in favour of … the appellant in other claim case filed by him, namely, Claim Application No. 3/8/71 (Suit No. 7 of 1989), disposed of an 18.6.1992, whereas in the orders under challenge the Tribunal has interpreted differently and thereby non-suited … order dated 26.2.1992, in Claim Application No. 3/8/75 and Miscellaneous Appeal No. 198 of 1993 arises out of an order dated 11.9.1992 in R.C.T. No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 1991

N. and W. Ry. Vs. TraIn Dispatchers

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-19-1991

Subject : Land Acquisition

adverse effect on competition among rail carriers in the affected region." [ Footnote 2 ] On September 9, 1989, the Commission also filed a petition for rehearing, and requested the court to refrain from ruling on the … has approved a rail carrier consolidation under the conditions set forth in Chapter 113 of the Interstate Commerce Act (Act), 49 U.S.C. § 11301 et seq., a carrier in such a consolidation "is exempt from the antitrust … such as those governing contracts, the court declined to decide whether the section could operate to override provisions of the Railway Labor Act (RLA) governing … may arise as additional coordinations occur." 366 I.C.C. at 230-231. In September, 1986, this possibility became a reality. The carriers notified the American Train Dispatchers'

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 1996

Arya Antherjanam Vs. Kerala State Electricity Board, Trivandrum

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-05-1996

Subject : ElectricityCivil

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 51; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 42 and 79; Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1996Ker309

down by a decision of this Court in K.S.E.B. v. Cheriyan Varghese, 1989 (1) Ker LT 451 : (AIR 1989 Ker 198), in the matter … duty.'The principle has been explained by Viscount Haldane, L.C. in British Westingouse Electric and . v. Underground Electric Railways Co. of London Ltd., (1912) AC 673, as follows :--'The fundamental basis is thus compensation for pecuniary loss … Orders passed by the District Judge in exercise of the jurisdiction under Section 16(3) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 read with Section 51 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910 are under challenge in these revision petitions.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial