Advanced Search Results

South Central Railway Vs. Suchi Singh and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

and other items in the theft that said to have taken place. By virtue of Section 2(32) of Railways Act, 1989 each zone of the railways has to be impleaded, and that complainant cannot claim deficiency in service on … in reserved compartment was deficiency in service [see Union of India v. Sanjiv Dilsukhrai Dave, I (2003) CPJ 196 (NC)]. 14. The National Commission had an occasion to consider these provisions vis-a-vis responsibility of the railways in

Jayakrishna Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Chairman of Railway Board

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, 1989, can only be filed if there is contravention of the provisions of Section 70 of the Railways Act, 1989. Section 70 of the Act prohibits undue preference.39. The railway administration is barred from giving unreasonable preference or advantage … Honble Supreme Court in the case of Upper Doap Sugar Mills Ltd. vs. S.S.L Railway Company Limited, AIR 196.SC 217.holding therein that the Railway Rates Tribunal has no jurisdiction to give relief to the complainant for the

Union of India Through Its General Manager North Eastern Railway Gorak ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : MRTP

to discharge. 6. Learned counsel has also relied on the provisions of sections 97 and 100 of the Railways Act, 1989 under which the railways cannot be held liable for compensation in this case and the State Commission erred … the complainant which she has failed to discharge. 6. Learned counsel has also relied on the provisions of sections 97 and 100 of the Railways Act, 1989 under which the railways cannot be held liable for compensation … Unionof India and Ors. Vs. Sanjiv Dilsukhraj Dave and Anr. [2003 CTJ 196 (CP) (NCDRC) and Mrs. Kanthimathi and Anr. Vs. Govt. of India where

Union of India Through Its General Manager North Eastern Railway Gorak ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Subject : MRTP

to discharge. 6. Learned counsel has also relied on the provisions of sections 97 and 100 of the Railways Act, 1989 under which the railways cannot be held liable for compensation in this case and the State Commission erred … the complainant which she has failed to discharge. 6. Learned counsel has also relied on the provisions of sections 97 and 100 of the Railways Act, 1989 under which the railways cannot be held liable for compensation … Unionof India and Ors. Vs. Sanjiv Dilsukhraj Dave and Anr. [2003 CTJ 196 (CP) (NCDRC) and Mrs. Kanthimathi and Anr. Vs. Govt. of India where

Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd. Vs. Raman Ispat Private Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

effect on all other laws except Consumer Protection Act, 1986; the Atomic Energy Act, 1962; and the Railway Act, 1989. Being a special law relating to all aspects of electricity - generation, transmission, distribution and adjudication of disputes … and Bankruptcy Board of India is established under Section 188 of the IBC. Is powers are enumerated under Section 196. 9 Jitender Nath Singh v. Official Liquidator & Ors., 2012 (13) SCR339 10 ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Sidco

Divisional Railway Manager/Commercial, Southern Railway (Thycord) and ...

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Subject : Right to Information

the case on merit and referred to the relevant provisions of Section 51(1) and Section 61 of the Railways Act, 1989 and held, inter alia, as under: “.....The O.Ps. have tried to rely on the rules framed under Section … K.K. Srivastava, President: 1. The two complaint cases bearing No. 168/2004 (RBT No. 590/2004) and 196/2004 (RBT No. 591/2004) involving similar questions of facts have been decided by a common judgment and order dated

Namita Chopra vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

his own, and therefore the case does not fall within the ambit of an “untoward” incident under the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”).5. This Court has heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the … and Mr. Kautilya Birat, GPCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT (ORAL)1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 23 of the RailwayClaims Tribunal Act, 1987 against the judgment dated 27.05.2014 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal,

Gopal Singh Vs. Indian Railway Const. Company Ltd.(ircon)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25

Reported in : (2000)IILLJ845Del

1956. It is a Government of India enterprises, run under the aegis and control of the Ministry of Railways. The main purpose for which the Company was formed was for the construction of railway tracks, roads, highways, … NPalika BhawanR. K. Puram, New Delhi '5. On the 20th of October, 1989, the term of service of Gopal Singh, the first petitioner in CW. … state about the formation of the IRCON. 2. IRCON was incorporated in the year 1976 under Indian Companies Act, 1956. It is a Government of India enterprises, run under the aegis and control of the Ministry of … comply with the provisions of V-B of the Industrial Dispute Act particularly Section 25-O if it was closing down its Dadri Project and the services

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

v. Jalgaon 158 AIR1967SC295(para 10, 27, 60 and64) 159 (1969) 1 SCC325(paras 7 to 9, 11 and13) 160 1989 (2) Supp. SCC201(paras 8, 9 and13) 161 (2002) 3 SCC496(para10) 162 AIR1961SC1519163 AIR1991SC1216(paras 6 to10) 164 (supra at … Parliament commensurate with modern safety norms; and (xiv) To preserve the built heritage by not undertaking aggressive reconstruction activity on graded heritage structures on which only minimum renovation measures are permissible in law.9. Before we begin the … 229 d) Procedure during decision- 230-265 making process and Public Hearing under Section 11A e) Quasi Legislative Function 266-273 f) Post change in land use … of Venice Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites, 1964.86. Advancing the argument regarding direct public consultation, the petitioners have stated that

Gujarat Ambuja Cements Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 27A, 27A(1), 27A(2) and 28(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 226; Railway Board Act; Indian Contract Act - Sections 72

Reported in : AIR1994Guj104; (1993)2GLR1460

No. 2 of 1989 andto declare the said General Orders ultra vires to Section 27A of the Indian Railways Act, Article 14 and 19(1)(d) of the Constitution of India, and General Order No. I of 1990 dated 10-5-90 … distance between Sabarmati and Kodinar on the longest route is 213 Kms., that on the medium route is 196 Kms., and that on the shortest route is 139 Kms. Thus, the difference of distance between the longest