Advanced Search Results

M.P. Rajya Nagrik Apoorti Nigam Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 106 and 194

Reported in : 2004(3)MPHT263; 2004(3)MPLJ457

however, it was dispatched on 22-9-93 that explains the discrepancy in the date 18-94993 mentioned in the application, Section 194 of the Railways Act provides for 'Presumption where notice is served by post'. Section 194 is quoted below … Claims Tribunal. Non-delivery certificate was issued by Railways on 21-8-93. A Notice under Section 106 of the Indian Railways Act to the Railway Administration by Registered Post acknowledgment due 18-9-93 was sent vide Receipt No, 1243. The Railways

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Smt. Laxmipati and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 13; Railway Claims Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1989 - Rule 1; Railway Accidents (Compensation) Rules, 1989 - Rule 1; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34

Reported in : 1995ACJ644; AIR1995MP90; 1995(0)MPLJ28

of 1983 enhancing the limit of compensation to Rs. 1 lac.4. The 1890 Act was replaced by Indian Railways Act, 1989. The Act does not contain any provisions regarding compensation. The Act does not incorporate the provisions noticed above … of documents. The Claims Commissioner shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for all the purposes of Section 194 and Chapter XXXV, C.P.C. Section 82(E) enabled the Claims Commissioner to pass interim orders. Section 82(F) enabled the

Divisional Railway Manager, Raipur (C.G.) and Another Vs. Vikas Agrawa ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

Subject : MRTP

1987 and cancellation of ticket and refund are questions to be considered u/s 51 and 52 of the Railways Act, 1989 and come under the category of “statutory duty” for which no extra amount has been paid and so … was resisted by the appellants/OPs on the ground that it was not maintainable before the District Forum as Section 13 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 provides for exclusive jurisdiction of the Tribunal in respect of

N. and W. Ry. Vs. TraIn Dispatchers

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

adverse effect on competition among rail carriers in the affected region." [ Footnote 2 ] On September 9, 1989, the Commission also filed a petition for rehearing, and requested the court to refrain from ruling on the … Schwabacher v. United States, 334 U. S. 182 , 334 U. S. 194 -195, 334 U. S. 200 -201. This determination makes sense of the … has approved a rail carrier consolidation under the conditions set forth in Chapter 113 of the Interstate Commerce Act (Act), 49 U.S.C. § 11301 et seq., a carrier in such a consolidation "is exempt from the antitrust … such as those governing contracts, the court declined to decide whether the section could operate to override provisions of the Railway Labor Act (RLA) governing

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

v. Jalgaon 158 AIR1967SC295(para 10, 27, 60 and64) 159 (1969) 1 SCC325(paras 7 to 9, 11 and13) 160 1989 (2) Supp. SCC201(paras 8, 9 and13) 161 (2002) 3 SCC496(para10) 162 AIR1961SC1519163 AIR1991SC1216(paras 6 to10) 164 (supra at … 124, paras 21, 21.1., 21.6 and22) 193 (2013) 4 SCC575(paras 31 and32) 194 (2018) 5 SCC462(paras 14, 15 and27) 195 (supra at 58, paras 105 … Parliament commensurate with modern safety norms; and (xiv) To preserve the built heritage by not undertaking aggressive reconstruction activity on graded heritage structures on which only minimum renovation measures are permissible in law.9. Before we begin the … 229 d) Procedure during decision- 230-265 making process and Public Hearing under Section 11A e) Quasi Legislative Function 266-273 f) Post change in land use

Cbocs West, Inc. Vs. Humphries

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

discrimination impairs an existing contractual relationship”); Patterson v. McLean Credit Union , 491 U. S. 164 , 171 (1989) (“[Section] 1981 ‘prohibits racial discrimination in the making and enforcement of private contracts’ ” (quoting Runyon v. McCrary , … the rights of minorities’ ” (emphasis in original)), with id ., at 194 (Thomas, J., dissenting). Regardless, the linguistic argument that CBOCS makes was apparent … managers that a black co-employee was also dismissed for race-based reasons, respondent Humphries filed suit charging that CBOCS’ actions violated both Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U. S. C. §1981, the

Power Grid Corporation of India Vs. the Asst. Commissioner of I.T.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2007)112TTJ(Hyd.)654

particular ser. d. The equipments used by POWERGRID are also used by State Transmission Companies, Private Transmission Companies, Railways, Power Generating Companies for switchyard quipments. e. Even Appellant supply the same to other utilities while executing various … given below. The assessee is a central government undertaking engaged in the activity of transmission and power distribution of electricity to various constituents across the … not marketable and hence the contract is a "works contract" is totally misplaced statement.3.8. Coming to application of Section 194-C, it was submitted that the section would be applicable if any person is making payment to any resident

M/S. Sanwaria Steel Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Orissa

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Orissa Mineral (Prevention of Theft, Smuggling & Illegal Mining and Regulation of Possession, Storage, Trading & Transportation) Rules, 2007 - Rules 7, 9, 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 144, 145

levied on goods/consignment not removed from railway premises after the expiry of free time (Section VI of the Railways Act, 1989). No wharfage will be levied on the consignment held by Railway administration on lien in terms of Section

Central Bank of Denver, N. A. Vs. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. ...

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

Moore v. Frost, 483 U. S. 1006 (1987); Schlifke v. Seafirst Corp., 866 F.2d 935 , 947 (CA7 1989); K & S Partnership v. Continental Bank, N. A., 952 F.2d 971 , 977 (CA8 1991); Levine v. … November 30, 1993-Decided April 19, 1994 As this Court has interpreted it, § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 imposes private civil liability on those who commit a manipulative or deceptive act in connection with … Supreme Court decisions strictly interpreting the federal securities laws." Secondary Liability Under Section 10(b) of the Securities Act of 1934, 69 Calif. L. Rev. 80, … S. C. § 78j. 172 Rule 10b-5, adopted by the SEC in 1942, casts the proscription in similar terms: "It shall be unlawful for any

Lawrence and Another Vs. Coventry and Others

Court : UK Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

which arises if the project is authorized by statute In the 19th century, long before modern planning control, railways were built under private acts which not only conferred the necessary powers to acquire or interfere with private … and the business was subsequently conducted without his involvement In 1988 and 1989, the company obtained planning permission to construct two new buildings to house … this case is nuisance in the sense of personal discomfort, in particular nuisance by noise, as opposed to actual injury to the claimant's property (such as discharge of noxious material or removal of support) 2. As Lord … contended that they had become immune from planning control enforcement, pursuant to section 191 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, as substituted by … development control which have existed in England since 1947 159. The ordinary principle is that the court