Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: railways act 1989 section 192 · Page 1 of about 105 results (0.050 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 17 2008

Rajesh Anil and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-17-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(34), 137, 141 to 147, 150 to 157, 160 to 162, 164, 166, 168, 172 to 175, 179, 180D, 180E and 180F; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 167, 167(1), 190, 190(1), 192, 200, 202, 202(1), 202(2), 460, 461, 465, 465(2) and 482

Reported in : 2009CriLJ845

Matched in: Advocate V.V. Surendran and; P.A. Harish, Advs. Jai George, Public Prosecutor for Respondent No. 1 and; Alexander Thomas, S.C. for Railways for Respo

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2026

Yogesh Kumar Jaiswal & Ors. vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-22-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

2 of 6 would fall within the exception carved out under proviso (d) to Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), namely, an act committed in a state of intoxication.4. Learned counsel appearing … COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 13.05.2026Pronounced on : 22.05.2026Uploaded on : 22.05.2026 + FAO 192/2024 YOGESH KUMAR JAISWAL & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Rajan Sood, Ms. Ashima Sood and Ms. Megha Sood, AdvocatesversusUNION

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 2014

M/S. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-11-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Tribunal dated 27.2.2009 which has dismissed the claim petition as the requisite notice under Section 106 of the Railways Act, 1989 was not given, and which notice is a pre-requisite for filing of the claim petition.2. The Railway Claims … 29.1.1994 and 19.2.1994 were served on the respondents and another notice under Section 78B & 140 (106 & 192 of the new Act) of the Indian Railways Act dated 18.2.1992 was also issued. The respondents in para

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 12 1995

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. India Cements Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-12-1995

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1996ACJ959

claim of compensation under Section 78-B of the Indian Railways Act, 1890, corresponding to Section 106 of the Railways Act, 1989, was sent to the railway authorities on 6.1.1992. The appellant, however, states that it was received on 24.1.1992. … who is the owner or lessee of the railway or the person working the railway under an agreement. Section 192 of the same Act says that a notice required to be served on a railway administration may be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 26 2001

Union of India (Uoi), South Central Railway and anr. Vs. V. Gavarraju ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-26-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 65(2)

Reported in : 2001(5)ALT539

not choose to examine their officials. As pointed out, as per Sub-section (2) of Section 65 of the Railways Act, 1989, the railway receipt is a prima facie evidence of the weight and number of packages stated therein. The … 50 kgs. each. However, at the destination point it was found that there was a short delivery of 192 bags. Hence the claim for the value of me said goods along with freight charges and interest.3. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 1992

Selvi Travels and Etc. Vs. Union of India and Another

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-11-1992

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Passports Act, 1967 - Sections 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12 and 24; Constitution of India - Articles 4, 14 and 32; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 47 and 66

Reported in : AIR1993Mad216

32 of Constitution of India, Section 115 of Evidence Act, 1872 and Sections 47 and 66 of Indian Railways Act, 1989 - petition for quashing Circular dated 24.07.192 - in present case licence had been issued by Government to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 2003

Sandha Ghosh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-11-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(29), 55, 68,123 and 124A; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 302

Reported in : 2004(1)CHN696

in his reply submitted that having regard to the object and scope of such beneficial legislation i.e. The Railways Act, 1989, the strict rule of interpretation cannot have any application whatsoever.14. There can be no dispute as to the … Joji C. John v. Union of India, reported in 2002(2) TAG page 192 (Ker) (DB); the case of Raj Kumari. and Anr. v. Union of … identified the dead body as that of said Ananda Ghosh. Over this, Naihati GRPS Case No. 11/98 under Section 302 of I.P.C. dated 5th March, 1998 was started. Appellants, as applicants before the learned Tribunal claimed that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 10 2002

District Manager, Food Corporation of India Vs. Gottavilli Venkata Rat ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-10-2002

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2 and 4A(3)

Reported in : III(2003)ACC133; 2003(2)ALD146; [2003(97)FLR206]

or business) who is-- (i) a railway servant as defined in Clause (34) of Section 2 of the Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989), not permanently employed in any administrative, district or sub-divisional office of a railway and not … petitioner. Therefore she requested to award a sum of Rs. 83,192/- towards compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 ('the Act' for brevity) with interest at 12% per annum.4. The respondent resisted the claim contending that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2021

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-05-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

v. Jalgaon 158 AIR1967SC295(para 10, 27, 60 and64) 159 (1969) 1 SCC325(paras 7 to 9, 11 and13) 160 1989 (2) Supp. SCC201(paras 8, 9 and13) 161 (2002) 3 SCC496(para10) 162 AIR1961SC1519163 AIR1991SC1216(paras 6 to10) 164 (supra at … Parliament commensurate with modern safety norms; and (xiv) To preserve the built heritage by not undertaking aggressive reconstruction activity on graded heritage structures on which only minimum renovation measures are permissible in law.9. Before we begin the … 229 d) Procedure during decision- 230-265 making process and Public Hearing under Section 11A e) Quasi Legislative Function 266-273 f) Post change in land use … basis.3. The Parliament House building, a Grade-I heritage structure, was commissioned in 1927 and stands as a 93 years old structure today. The structure has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 1998

Darshan Pal and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-19-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 73

Reported in : 74(1998)DLT806; 1998(46)DRJ274; (1998)120PLR24

survive for decision on merits.2. Still the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that Section 73 of the Railways Act, 1989 empowers the Railway to make recovery of the freight and other charges including penalty 'before delivery of the … goods. - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual leave Sustained injury which contributed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial