Advanced Search Results
R. Sai Bharathi Vs. J. Jayalalitha and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-24-2003
Criminal
Companies Act, 1956; Indian Stamp Act - Sections 47A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 43, 109, 119, 120B, 169, 175, 176, 177, 179, 181, 191, 202, 221, 222, 223, 225, 405, 409 and 420; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Prevention of Undervaluation of Instruments Rules - Rules 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7; Tamil Nadu Stamp Act; Indian Trust Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 136; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 73; Constitution of India - Articles 73, 136, 154, 162 and 309; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 189; Cattle Trespass Act, 1871 - Sections 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 481
2004CriLJ286; 2003(4)CTC577; JT2003(9)SC343; 2003(10)SCALE68b; (2004)2SCC9
it, it becomes an offence under Section 169 IPC. Section 481 Criminal Procedure Code, Section 189 of the Railways Act, 1989 and Section 19 of the Cattle Trespass Act, 1871 and instances of that nature in several enactments are
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSelvi J. Jayalalitha Vs. State Rep by Addl. Superintendent of Police, ...
Chennai
Jan-13-2000
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 -- Sections 91, 147, 173, 227, 239 and 240; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 -- Sections 21, 22, 24, 25, 43, 109, 120, 139, 159, 169, 403, 405, 407, 408, 409, 415 and 420; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 -- Sections 5(1) and 13(1); Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 -- Sections 5; Companies Act, 1956; Constitution of India -- Article 13(3) and 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 -- Order 21, Rule 73; Cattle Trespass Act, 1871 -- Sections 19; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 136; Railway Act, 1989 -- Sections 83, 84, 85 and 189; General Clauses Act, 1897 -- Sections 3(38)
2001CriLJ3074; 2000(2)CTC116
claiming by or through him, any actionable claims so dealt with by him as aforesaid.'Section 189 of the Railways Act, 1989 says-'Railway servants not to engage in trade.--A railway servant shall not- (a) purchase or bid for, either in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Vs. Rajkot Municipal Corporation
Gujarat
Sep-19-2002
Municipal Tax
Constitution of India - Article 285 and 285(1); Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 127, 129, 130, 131 and 132; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Rules - Rules 39, 40 and 45(1); ;Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 135, 135(1) and 135(4); Railways (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 184(1) and 184(4)
AIR2003Guj87; (2002)3GLR904
the property occupied by the railway is concerned, there was no notification issued under Section 184(1) of the Railways Act, 1989, which corresponded to Section 135(1) of the Act of 1890. According to the petitioner, there was also no … of Section135(1) of the Act of 1890, and in absence of any contract as contemplatedunder Sub-section (4) of Section 189 or under Sub-section (4) of the correspondingprovision of Section 135 of the Act of 1890, it was not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt Chanda Devi & Ors. vs Union of India
Delhi
Feb-05-2026
Land Acquisition
train in question nor the alleged incident was proven to be an “untoward incident” as defined under the Railways Act, 1989.3. Briefly stated, the facts necessary for adjudication of the presentappeal are that in the claim petition, it was … is condoned.7. The application is disposed of in above terms. FAO 189/20241. The present appeal is filed under Section 23 of the Railway ClaimsTribunal Act, 1987, assailing the judgment dated 05.09.2023 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Durmesh Coal and ors.
Guwahati
May-04-2007
Civil
the railway authorities by taking recourse to the provisions of Section 73 read with Section 72 of the Railways Act, 1989,but the railway authorities do not unload the excess load and/or adjust the excess load by unloading the excess … 183/2001, W.A. No. 184/2001, W.A. No. 185/2001, W.A. No. 186/2001, W.A. No. 187/2001, W.A. No. 188/2001, W.A. No. 189/2001, W.A. No. 191/2001, W.A. No. 193/2001, which have arisen out of the common Judgment and order, dated 07.05.2005,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBagadiya Brothers Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Kolkata
May-12-2015
Land Acquisition
Central government under the Indian Railways Act, 1890. The Indian Railways Act, 1890 has been repealed by the Railways Act, 1989. Section 200 of the Railways Act, 1989 deals with repeal and saving. Section 200 of the Railways Act, 1989 … Railway Board Act, 1905 invests the Railway Board with certain powers of functioning under the Indian Railways Act, 1890. The Railways Act, 1989 has repealed the Indian Railways Act, 1890. The Indian Railway Board Act, 1905 has
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNirmal Traders Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Guwahati
Apr-08-2003
Civil
Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78 and 79; Constitution of India - Article 226
consignment to the consignee or endorsee. 27. That the railways have special powers under Section 78 of the'Indian Railways Act, 1989 to, inter alia, re-weigh or remeasure any consignment before delivery of the same cannot be disputed and is … on the unreported Division Bench decision, dated 7.8.1998, of this High Court in Writ Appeal Nos. 183/1990 and 189/1990 (Union of India and Ors. v. Bharat Coal Depot, etc.) 14. Controverting the above submissions made on behalf
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNirmal Traders Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Guwahati
Apr-09-2003
Civil
Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78 and 79; Constitution of India - Article 226
Matched in: Advocate G.N. Sahewalla, Sr. Adv. B. Sharma, SC, Railways and B. Das, SC, CBI
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.K. Gupta and Anr vs Union of India
Delhi
May-20-2026
Land Acquisition
a bonafide passenger in terms of the expression as required under the provision of Section 2(29) of the Railways Act, 1989 xxxI am strengthened in my aforesaid view of the deceased being a bonafide passenger in view of explanation … nor did the incident come within the ambit of an “untoward incident” as defined under the Railways Act, 189 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”).3. The brief facts of the case, as stated in the claim application,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India
Supreme Court of India
Jan-05-2021
Land Acquisition
v. Jalgaon 158 AIR1967SC295(para 10, 27, 60 and64) 159 (1969) 1 SCC325(paras 7 to 9, 11 and13) 160 1989 (2) Supp. SCC201(paras 8, 9 and13) 161 (2002) 3 SCC496(para10) 162 AIR1961SC1519163 AIR1991SC1216(paras 6 to10) 164 (supra at … Et. Al. v. 188 (2006) 10 SCC1(paras 56, 77 and 89 to92) 189 (2010) 14 SCC253(paras 22, 23 and26) 190 (2009) 7 SCC561(paras 113 to … Parliament commensurate with modern safety norms; and (xiv) To preserve the built heritage by not undertaking aggressive reconstruction activity on graded heritage structures on which only minimum renovation measures are permissible in law.9. Before we begin the … 229 d) Procedure during decision- 230-265 making process and Public Hearing under Section 11A e) Quasi Legislative Function 266-273 f) Post change in land use
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »