Advanced Search Results

Satish Chandra Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 197

Reported in : 1997CriLJ1210; 1996(38)DRJ219

authority of the Railway Administration hence the petitioner only discharged his official function. The competent authority of the Railways passed the order after the stipulated period fixed by the Supreme Court for the Firm to vacate the … as stipulated under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter in short called 'Code'). Secondly, under Section 186 of the Indian Railway Act,1989, no prosecution or other legal proceedings could be initiated against a railway servant

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Mukesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Railway Act, 1989 - Sections 143(1), 143(2) and 186; Evidence Act - Sections 30; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 107

Reported in : [2007(1)JCR317(SC)]; 2006(10)SCALE346

We, therefore, do not intend to interfere therewith. The appeal is dismissed. Criminal - Abetment- Section 143 of Railways Act, 1989 and Section 107of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 107 - Respondents were Railway reservation clerks - They … the basis that the accused Nos. 2 to 7 had not acted in good faith as envisaged under Section 186 of the Railways Act.7. The fact that more than one ticket had been issued from different counters at

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Prabhakaran Vijaya Kumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(29), 123 and 124A; Workmen's Compensation Act 1923 - Sections 3; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140 and 163A; Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991; Constitution of India - Article 38(1)

Reported in : 2008ACJ1895; 2008(5)ALLMR(SC)917; (2008)3GLR2400(SC); 2008(2)KLT700(SC); 2009(1)MhLj27; (2008)4MLJ323(SC); RLW2009(1)SC236; 2008(9)SCALE182; (2008)9SCC527; 2008AIRSCW4165; 2008ACJ1895; 2008(3)LH(SC)1872; JT2008(4)SC598; [2008] 7 SCR 673; MANU/SC/7608/2008

that this was not an 'untoward incident' within the meaning of the expression in Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989 as it was not an accidental falling of a passenger from a train carrying passengers.9. In appeal, the … have originated from the historic judgment of Blackburn, J. of the British High Court in Rylands v. Fletcher 1866 LRI Ex 265.19. Before this decision the accepted legal position in England was that fault, whether by an

S. K. Sarawagi and Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

to the stacking happening. The same would, therefore, not come within the purview of Section 37 of the Railways Act, 1989 in view of the ratio laid down in Union of India versus M/S.Modi Industries Limited, reported in (1973)

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Durmesh Coal and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

the railway authorities by taking recourse to the provisions of Section 73 read with Section 72 of the Railways Act, 1989,but the railway authorities do not unload the excess load and/or adjust the excess load by unloading the excess … dispose of these nine writ appeals, namely, W.A. No. 183/2001, W.A. No. 184/2001, W.A. No. 185/2001, W.A. No. 186/2001, W.A. No. 187/2001, W.A. No. 188/2001, W.A. No. 189/2001, W.A. No. 191/2001, W.A. No. 193/2001, which have arisen

Senior Commercial Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai and Others Vs. T. ...

Court : Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Thiruvananthapuram

Subject : Land Acquisition

declared. In case of declaration of the value transportation charges on percentage basis vide section 103(2) of the Railways Act, 1989 and Rules thereon had to be paid. It is further contended that the complaint is not maintainable vide … JUSTICE SHRI.K.R. UDAYABHANU : PRESIDENTThe appellants are the opposite parties/Railways in C.C. 186/09 in the file of CDRF, Thiruvananthapuram. The appellants are under orders to pay a sum of Rs. 1,45,928/-

A.F.Vishwanath. S/O Pakeerappa, and anr. Vs. Union of IndiA.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Railways Act. 1989 - Sections 123(c)(2), 124(a) ;

fell down from the train, which according to them is an untoward incident under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act. 1989. Hence the Claim Petition was filed by them seeking compensation for the death of V.Lohit.3. In the said … son V.Lohit is said to have died in an accident, which has taken place on 13.03.2006 at K.M.No. 186/9-10 between Devanur and Banavar. The case of the applicants before the Tribunal is that the deceased V.Lohit is

Ganesh vs Union of India (Ministry of Railway) Through Its General Man ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

and that the incident in question was not an “untoward incident” as defined under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter “the Act”).5. Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the Tribunal erred inrejecting the claim as it … 02.01.2014 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi (hereinafter “the Tribunal”) in Claim Application No. OA(IIu) 186/2012.2. The facts in a nutshell are that the injured, Ganesh, preferred a claimapplication stating that on 13.01.2011, he

S.K. Sarawagi and Company Private Ltd. and Anr. Vs. Union of India and ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Land Acquisition

that the writ petitioner has no other alternative remedy against the order impugned. The Tribunal established under the Railways Act, 1989 has no jurisdiction to determine the instant proceedings. In support of such contention reliance is placed on 1973 … Railway authorities is subsequent to the stacking happening. The same would therefore not come within the purview of Section 37 of the Railways Act, 1989 in view of the ratio laid down in M/S.Modi Industries LTD.(supra).In M/S.Modi

M/S Kashyap???s Vs. Bata India Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

compensation for the wrongful termination and not a claim for specific performance. A subsequent Division Bench in Indian Railways Catering & Tourism Corp. Ltd. v. Cox & Kings India Ltd. 186 (2012) DLT 55.not only followed the … together with interest thereon, pleading: (i) that the parties on 9th December, 1989 entered into a Joint Retail Venture Agreement in terms of which the … Agreement to be terminable by a 15 days notice only. Relying on Section 9 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, it is contended that the plaintiff by remaining quiet after the letter dated 1 st February, 2003