Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: railways act 1989 section 185 · Page 1 of about 86 results (0.046 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 04 2012

M/s. Sri Ragavendra Ad Lab Rep. by Its Proprietor and Others Vs. the S ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-04-2012

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : 2013(1)CWC87; 2013WLR66

the Railway premises, the petitioners cannot be asked to take licence in view of Section 185 of the Railways Act, 1989. He also relied on Article 285 of the Constitution of India in this regard. He has relied on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 2008

T.S.T. Kaznavi Vs. Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Rep. by Its Chairman,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-28-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act; Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 2(17), 2(28), 2(29), 2(32), 2(67), 2(72), 2(73), 2(77), 39(1), 67(2), 68, 164, 173, 174, 175, 185 and 185(2); Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10, 16, 16(1) and 16(3); Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 2, 12 to 19 and 51; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 42 and 51; Consumer Protection Act, 1986; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; The Works of Licensees Rules, 2006; Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 188

Reported in : (2008)2MLJ703

the Act, which relates to the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 or the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 or the Railways Act, 1989. The provisions are also stated to be in addition to and not in derogation of other laws, under … powers of Telegraph authority by virtue of the provisions contained in Section 164 read with Sub-section (2)(a) of Section 185 of the Electricity Act, 2003.2(d). According to the respondent Electricity Board, it conducted extensive survey including the environmental

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 13 2006

Torrent Power Aec Ltd. Vs. Gayatri Intermediates Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Apr-13-2006

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 1 to 120 and 122 to 185; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 21(2), 26(6), 39 to 50; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 173; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganization and Regulations) Act, 2003; Electricity (Supply) Rules, 1948; Electricity Rules, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 47, Rule 1; Electricity Supply Code - Sections 7; Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply code and Related matters) Regulations, 2005 - Regulations 7, 7.1 to 7.4, 7.5, 7.6.1, 7.6.2 to 7.6.4, 7.6.5 to 7.6.8 and 7.7; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1) and 226

Reported in : (2006)2GLR1580

other than this Act.Section 173 refers to the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and Railways Act, 1989.20.3 In view of the provisions of Sections 45, 50 and 62 of the Act, till 7th June … 10th day of June 2003 as the date on which Sections 1 to 120 and Section 122 to 185 of the Electricity Act, 2003 came into force. Clause (d) of Section 172 containing transitional provisions reads as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 12 2000

Union of India Through General Manager, Northern Railway and Others Vs ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-12-2000

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 185, 205, 285, 287, 289 and 366; Uttar Pradesh Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Sections 3, 4, 18, 20, 24, 25, 52, 53, 59, 60 and 64; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 184 ; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 135; Punjab Municipal Act; New Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1994; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957; Factories Act, 1948; Uttar Pradesh Dookan Aur Vanijya Adhisthan Adhiniyam, 1956

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC732; (2001)1UPLBEC420

down in the aforesaid two decisions. He further supported his arguments by referring to Section 184 of the Railways Act, 1989. Sri Agarwal particularly emphasized the sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 184, which for ready reference are quoted … The Indian Railways Act being a Central enactment has no role to play in sub-article (2) of Article 185, for that is a sphere in which the State legislation operates. The reasoning of the High Court to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2013

T.Bhuvaneswari Vs. District Collector Cum District Magistrate of Erode ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-29-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

with any other provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 or the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 or the Railways Act, 1989.174. Act to have overriding effect.--Save as otherwise provided in Section 173, the provisions of this Act shall … are in addition to and not in derogation of any other law for the time being in force.32. Section 185 of the Electricity Act, 2003 deals with repeal and saving. The said Section reads as follows: ".185. Repeal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2019

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-13-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act 1957 iv. The Trade Marks Act 1999 63 v. The Railway Claims Tribunal Act 1987 vi. The Railways Act 1989 vii. The Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) PART F Act 1976 viii. The Foreign Exchange … that a Member would be eligible for reappointment. An upper age limit is prescribed by the second proviso. Section 185 (1) stipulates that Chairpersons, Presidents or Vice Chairpersons, Vice Presidents, Presiding Officers and Members of the Tribunals or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2026

Smt Chanda Devi & Ors. vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-05-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

train in question nor the alleged incident was proven to be an “untoward incident” as defined under the Railways Act, 1989.3. Briefly stated, the facts necessary for adjudication of the presentappeal are that in the claim petition, it was … JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTCM APPL. 34302/2024 (Application seeking condonation of delay of 185 days in filing the present appeal by the appellants)1. By way of … is condoned.7. The application is disposed of in above terms. FAO 189/20241. The present appeal is filed under Section 23 of the Railway ClaimsTribunal Act, 1987, assailing the judgment dated 05.09.2023 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 05 2025

Union of India versus M/S Kamakhya Transport Pvt. Ltd. Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-05-2025

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025]7S.C.R.346

held that the Railway authorities could not have raised the demand notice after the delivery of goods. Headnotes† Railways Act, 1989 - s.66 - Power to require statement relating to the description of goods - Appellant raised demand notices … either before or after delivery - Thus, the legislative intent is to permit levy of charge under this Section, at either stage and not at a specific one - High Court erred in holding that penal charges … the Railway Claims Tribunal, Guwahati Bench in OA Nos.229/12, 184/12, 228/12 and 185/2012 respectively came to be affirmed. Brief facts 3. The brief facts giving

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2007

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Durmesh Coal and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : May-04-2007

Subject : Civil

the railway authorities by taking recourse to the provisions of Section 73 read with Section 72 of the Railways Act, 1989,but the railway authorities do not unload the excess load and/or adjust the excess load by unloading the excess … we propose to dispose of these nine writ appeals, namely, W.A. No. 183/2001, W.A. No. 184/2001, W.A. No. 185/2001, W.A. No. 186/2001, W.A. No. 187/2001, W.A. No. 188/2001, W.A. No. 189/2001, W.A. No. 191/2001, W.A. No. 193/2001,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 14 2008

NaraIn Singh and anr. Vs. Financial Commissioner

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-14-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954 - Sections 66, 71 and 72; Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Sections 3(13), 23, 33, 36, 42, 50, 62, 64, 65, 81, 82, 84, 85, 150 (3), 185 and 185(4); Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 12 and 507; East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1948; Consolidation Act; Delhi Land Reforms Rules - Rule 22; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2; East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Rules

Reported in : 2008(105)DRJ122

land, respectively in khasra No. 6/19/2 (min) village Samepur, Delhi vide two separate sale deeds dated 4th May, 1989 executed by one Mr. Maman Singh. The said Mr. Maman Singh is father of Mr. Som Dutt. After … of appeal/proceedings before the Financial Commissioner in Appeal Nos. 12/94-CA and 13/94-CA. The first appeal was filed under Section 185(4) of the Reforms Act and the second appeal was filed under Section 72 of the Revenue Act. Appeal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial