Advanced Search Results

Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delh ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(20), 2(25), 2(31), 2(32) and 184; Metro Railways (Construction of Works) Act, 1978 - Sections 2(2) and 43; Delhi Metro Railway (Operation and Maintenance) Act, 2002 - Sections 2(2), 2(P) and 104; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 3(4); General Clauses Act, 1879 - Sections 8(1); Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act - Sections 28(A); Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944

Reported in : 150(2008)DLT367; 2008(103)DRJ369

decide the question whether the petitioner is liable to pay tax in view of Section 184 of the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the 1989 Act, for short). After remand, the Additional Assessor and Collector passed another

Union of India Through General Manager, Northern Railway and Others Vs ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 185, 205, 285, 287, 289 and 366; Uttar Pradesh Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Sections 3, 4, 18, 20, 24, 25, 52, 53, 59, 60 and 64; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 184 ; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 135; Punjab Municipal Act; New Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1994; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957; Factories Act, 1948; Uttar Pradesh Dookan Aur Vanijya Adhisthan Adhiniyam, 1956

Reported in : 2001(1)AWC732; (2001)1UPLBEC420

down in the aforesaid two decisions. He further supported his arguments by referring to Section 184 of the Railways Act, 1989. Sri Agarwal particularly emphasized the sub-sections (1) and (2) of Section 184, which for ready reference are quoted

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Sections 52; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 184; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 135; Municipal Corporation Act; Bombay Money-Lenders Act, 1946; Sales Tax Act; Constitution of India - Article 1(2), 3, 245(1), 246(4), 285, 285(1), 289, 289(1) and 289(2)

Reported in : AIR2008SC521; 2008(1)AWC483(SC); 2007(12)SCALE719; [2007]80SCL80(SC),2007AIRSCW7393

charge for the supply of water and maintenance of sewerage system. In this connection, Section 184 of the Railways Act, 1989 was also referred to which lays down that the railway administration shall not be liable to pay any

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Rajkot Municipal Corporation

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 285 and 285(1); Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 127, 129, 130, 131 and 132; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Rules - Rules 39, 40 and 45(1); ;Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 135, 135(1) and 135(4); Railways (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 184(1) and 184(4)

Reported in : AIR2003Guj87; (2002)3GLR904

the property occupied by the railway is concerned, there was no notification issued under Section 184(1) of the Railways Act, 1989, which corresponded to Section 135(1) of the Act of 1890. According to the petitioner, there was also no

Union of India (Uoi), Represented Through the General Manager, Central ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : 103(2007)CLT710

consumption, use and sale therein and (iii) entry tax being a substitute of octroi, Section 184 of the Railways Act, 1989 protects the Railway properties from levy of entry tax.4. Since the grounds taken and the question involved in

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act 1957 iv. The Trade Marks Act 1999 63 v. The Railway Claims Tribunal Act 1987 vi. The Railways Act 1989 vii. The Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) PART F Act 1976 viii. The Foreign Exchange … notified by the Union of India in the Ministry of Finance on 1 June 2017. In terms of Section 184 of the Finance Act 2017, the Rules specify: (i) criteria of eligibility; (ii) procedure of selection; (iii) provisions

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Roop Narayan and Etc.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 64 and 65; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17 and 114

Reported in : 1999ACJ413; AIR1997Raj123

to be paid since the claims had fallen within the exception Clause (f) of Section 93 of the Railways Act 1989 as it was owing to the omission or negligence on the part of the consignor that the goods … Jwala Singh v. Prem Singh, AIR 1972 Delhi 221. (vi) Ajit Prasad v. Nandini Satpathy, AIR 1975 Orissa 184. (vii) State of M. P. v. Sardarmal, AIR 1987 Madh Pra 156. (viii) Sobharam v. U. O. I.,

Federation of Okhla Industrial Association (Regd.) vs.lt Governor of D ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) had disputed liability to pay property tax in view of Section 184 of the Railways Act. This judgment notes that the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Limited is a Company registered under Section 617 of … 14.) (Emphasis by us) 249. The view was taken by the Supreme Court in the pronouncement reported at 1989 Supp (1) SCC205All India Sainik School Employees’ Association v. Defence Minister Cum Chairman Board of Governors, Sainik Schools

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Durmesh Coal and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

the railway authorities by taking recourse to the provisions of Section 73 read with Section 72 of the Railways Act, 1989,but the railway authorities do not unload the excess load and/or adjust the excess load by unloading the excess … Judgment and order, we propose to dispose of these nine writ appeals, namely, W.A. No. 183/2001, W.A. No. 184/2001, W.A. No. 185/2001, W.A. No. 186/2001, W.A. No. 187/2001, W.A. No. 188/2001, W.A. No. 189/2001, W.A. No. 191/2001,

Minu Mai Devi Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Civil

the spot.4. The appellant had approached the Railway Claims Tribunal for awarding compensation under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989. The defence taken on behalf of the respondent was that the deceased was not a bona fide passenger … by the appellant for award of compensation on account of death of her husband Bhuben Nath, Constable No. 184 of Hojai G.R.P. Outpost.2. We have heard Mr. D.C. Kath Haza-rika, learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr.