Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Roop Narayan and Etc.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 64 and 65; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 17 and 114

Reported in : 1999ACJ413; AIR1997Raj123

to be paid since the claims had fallen within the exception Clause (f) of Section 93 of the Railways Act 1989 as it was owing to the omission or negligence on the part of the consignor that the goods … M. P. v. Sardarmal, AIR 1987 Madh Pra 156. (viii) Sobharam v. U. O. I., AIR 1970 Patna 182. (ix) India Wire Products v. U.O.I., (1990) 2 SCC 574. (x) Abdul Hakim v. Jodhpur Rly., 1953 Raj

N. and W. Ry. Vs. TraIn Dispatchers

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

adverse effect on competition among rail carriers in the affected region." [ Footnote 2 ] On September 9, 1989, the Commission also filed a petition for rehearing, and requested the court to refrain from ruling on the … makes the contract binding. Cf. Schwabacher v. United States, 334 U. S. 182 , 334 U. S. 194 -195, 334 U. S. 200 -201. This … has approved a rail carrier consolidation under the conditions set forth in Chapter 113 of the Interstate Commerce Act (Act), 49 U.S.C. § 11301 et seq., a carrier in such a consolidation "is exempt from the antitrust … such as those governing contracts, the court declined to decide whether the section could operate to override provisions of the Railway Labor Act (RLA) governing

Govind Goenka Vs. Dayawati and Other

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012(2)TNMAC105

any person who is (i) a railway servant as defined in {clause (34) of section 2 of the Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989)} not permanently employed in any administrative, district or sub-divisional office of a railway and not

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. thellamekala Galib and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 161

Reported in : 2009ACJ774; 2008(2)ALD59; 2008(6)ALT451

of the bus held that the Railways contributed negligence to the extent of 40%.3. Section 161 of the Railways Act, 1989 reads as follows:Negligently crossing unmanned level arming:-If any person driving or leading a vehicle is negligent in crossing … Central Railway, Secunderabad, against the orders of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Guntur in M.V.O.P. Nos. 1068, 181, 182 and 184 of 1999.2. The claimants met with bus accident. They filed claim petitions against the Andhra Pradesh

Mamchand and Anr Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

It was alleged that respondent was not liable to pay compensation to appellants under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989 (the Act, for short) since deceased was neither a bonafide passenger of the said train nor had died … 28 days delay in re-filing is condoned. Application is disposed of. CM Appl. No.19190/2014 (for condonation of delay) 182 days delay in filing is condoned. Application is disposed of. FAO No.373/2014 1. Appellants filed a claim application

Mamchand and Anr Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

It was alleged that respondent was not liable to pay compensation to appellants under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989 (the Act, for short) since deceased was neither a bonafide passenger of the said train nor had died … 28 days delay in re-filing is condoned. Application is disposed of. CM Appl. No.19190/2014 (for condonation of delay) 182 days delay in filing is condoned. Application is disposed of. FAO No.373/2014 1. Appellants filed a claim application

Mamchand and anr Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

It was alleged that respondent was not liable to pay compensation to appellants under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989 (the Act, for short) since deceased was neither a bonafide passenger of the said train nor had died … 28 days delay in re-filing is condoned. Application is disposed of. CM Appl. No.19190/2014 (for condonation of delay) 182 days delay in filing is condoned. Application is disposed of. FAO No.373/2014 1. Appellants filed a claim application

Union of India vs Lt Col Mukul Dev

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

approach has been adopted by this Court while construing the provisions of the Act.”37. Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989 defines “untowardaccident” to include “accidental falling of a passenger from a train containing passengers”. The Supreme Court, in … train would be covered by the expression. Recognizing the fact that two interpretations were27 (1875) 1 Ch D 182 28 AIR 1941 FC 72 29 Raghuraj Singh v. Hari Kishan, AIR 1944 PC 35, per Lord Atkin

Asstt. Cit Vs. Shivalik Woollen Mills (P) Ltd.

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)86TTJ(Chd.)473

of its income, had taken into account a sum of Rs. 1,46,950 as damages and losses paid to railways, and in that case, the Tribunal has allowed the claim of the assessee because though the supplies were … the notice of the Commissioner (Appeals) that initially the Police department registered a case against the assessee under section 182 of the IPC and when the action of the police was challenged in the court of Judicial Magistrate … are that in response to the notice under section 148 of the Act, issued on 11-2-1993, the assessee filed its return declaring Nil income. The … is applied keeping in view the GP rate for the assessment years 1989-90, 1990-91 and also the surrender of the assessee on account of decline

Suo Motu vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Railway is authorised to represent the 1st respondent Union of India, Ministry of Railways.4. Section 57 of the Railways Act, 1989 deals with themaximum number of passengers of each compartment. As per Section 57, subject to the approval of … of Railway stations, tofacilitate the passengers to contact RPF personnel for security assistance.(f) A short film titled “Dial 182” with English subtitleis produced for creating awareness among public about the all India passenger security Help Line No.182,