Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: railways act 1989 section 167 · Page 1 of about 89 results (0.068 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 17 2008

Rajesh Anil and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-17-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(34), 137, 141 to 147, 150 to 157, 160 to 162, 164, 166, 168, 172 to 175, 179, 180D, 180E and 180F; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 167, 167(1), 190, 190(1), 192, 200, 202, 202(1), 202(2), 460, 461, 465, 465(2) and 482

Reported in : 2009CriLJ845

Matched in: Advocate V.V. Surendran and; P.A. Harish, Advs. Jai George, Public Prosecutor for Respondent No. 1 and; Alexander Thomas, S.C. for Railways for Respo

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2007

Preet Comforts and Anr. Vs. Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-10-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 6 and 30; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 124, 124A, 128, 128(1) and 128(2); Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 167

Reported in : 2008ACJ2797; 2007(5)ALD824; [2007(115)FLR1015]

very petition in W.C. No. 52 of 1999 is not maintainable in view of Section 128 of the Railways Act, 1989. Secondly, assuming that such a petition is maintainable, in view of the fact that respondents 3 and 4 … as before the Authority under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, one after the other. Even a reading of Section 167 of the Motor Vehicles Act would indicate that when a claim arises under the said Act and under

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 29 2004

Maulavi HusseIn Haji Abraham Umarji Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-29-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 3(1), 3(2), 23, 34(1), 49(2) and 50; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860; ;Indian Railways Act, 1989; ;Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984; Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 135; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167 and 167(2)

Reported in : AIR2004SC3946; 2004(2)ALD(Cri)620; 2004CriLJ3860; (2005)1GLR585; JT2004(6)SC227; 2004(6)SCALE320; (2004)6SCC672; 2004(2)LC1484(SC)

alleged commission of offences punishable under various provisions of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC'), Indian Railways Act, 1989 (in short the 'Railways Act') and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 (in short the … unbridled power to the investigating agency to seek police custody. That would negate the statutory limit provided in Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short the 'Code'). For harmonizing construction of the provisions it

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 12 1994

Hitendra Vishnu Thakur and Others Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Maharashtra a ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-12-1994

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 22(2); Explosive Act, 1884; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 114, 120, 147, 148, 149, 302 and 338; Terriorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1), 4, 6, 18, 19(1) and 20(4); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 2, 57, 167(2), 173, 260(1), 262, 263-265 and 436 to 450; Indian Arms Act, 1959 - SectionS 3 and 25(1); Explosive Substances Act, 1908; Inflammable Substances Act, 1952

Reported in : AIR1994SC2623; 1995CriLJ517; 1994(2)Crimes916(SC); JT1994(4)SC255; 1994(3)SCALE105; (1994)4SCC602; [1994]Supp1SCR360; 1994(2)LC786(SC); MANU/SC/0526/1994

Station and a first information report was lodged resulting in the registration of a case C.R.No. 90 of 1989. During the investigation, Patrick Frances Truskar and Ananda Ramachandra Patil were arrested in connection with the said case … Disruptive Activities Act. 1987. (hereinafter referred to as the TADA) be attracted? (2) Is the 1993 Amendment, amending Section 167(2) of the CrPC by modifying Section 20(4)(b) and adding a new provision as 20(4)(b), applicable to the pending

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2021

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-05-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

v. Jalgaon 158 AIR1967SC295(para 10, 27, 60 and64) 159 (1969) 1 SCC325(paras 7 to 9, 11 and13) 160 1989 (2) Supp. SCC201(paras 8, 9 and13) 161 (2002) 3 SCC496(para10) 162 AIR1961SC1519163 AIR1991SC1216(paras 6 to10) 164 (supra at … paras 22 and23) 165 (1975) 2 SCC818(para3) 166 1995 Supp (1) SCC434(para11) 167 2019 SCCOnline SC1144(paras 8 to 16, 19, 22 to 37, 43 and44) … Parliament commensurate with modern safety norms; and (xiv) To preserve the built heritage by not undertaking aggressive reconstruction activity on graded heritage structures on which only minimum renovation measures are permissible in law.9. Before we begin the … 229 d) Procedure during decision- 230-265 making process and Public Hearing under Section 11A e) Quasi Legislative Function 266-273 f) Post change in land use

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2007

Union of India (Uoi), Represented Through the General Manager, Central ...

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Apr-12-2007

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : 103(2007)CLT710

consumption, use and sale therein and (iii) entry tax being a substitute of octroi, Section 184 of the Railways Act, 1989 protects the Railway properties from levy of entry tax.4. Since the grounds taken and the question involved in … in case of Collector of Customs and Anr. v. State of West Bengal and Ors. (1999) 113-STC P. 167 (SC). The Hon'ble Court referring to the decision of the Constitution Bench consisting of nine Judges in Sea

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 30 2000

M/S Kalpataru Agroforest Enterprises Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-30-2000

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 18, 18(1) and (3), 23, 30 and 30(2); Railway Claims Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1989 - Rules 20, 32 and 32(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XLVII, Rules 1 and 2; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 74

Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT76

paid by the appellant and title to goods had passed to the consignee under Section 74 of the Railways Act, 1989 (henceforth 'the Act') and, consequently, the appellant could not file the claim for refund of excess of freight.8. … appeal involves common question of facts and law with connected Misc. Appeal Nos. 161/99, 163/99, 164/99, 166/99 and 167/99 between the same parties. For this reason the disposal of this appeal on merits shall govern the disposal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2014

Sh. Surendra Prasad Verma and anr. Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-07-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Railways is a strict liability and which is supported by the wording of Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989. Supreme Court has held that even if the bonafide passenger is guilty of negligence, yet, liability will be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2015

M/S S.D.Buildwell Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Rail Land Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-18-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

to the respondent by the Central Government in exercise of its power under Section 4 (D) of the Railways Act, 1989 and Rule 5 of the Rail Land Development Authority, 2006.” (f) The respondent misrepresented to the petitioner in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 25 2013

V.Srinivasan Vs. Secretary to Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution C ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-25-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

with any other provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 or the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 or the Railways Act, 1989. Similarly, Section 174, which gives overriding effect for the Electricity Act, 2003 makes it clear that such overriding … deals with the offence of a public servant disobeying law with intent to cause injury to any person. Section 167 deals with the offence of a public servant framing an incorrect document with intent to cause injury. Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial