Advanced Search Results

TahazhaThe Purayil Sarabi and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 123, 123(2), 124, 124A and 127; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34 - Order 11, Rule 2; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 3; Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 16; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act 1970; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 9; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 392

Reported in : 2009ACJ2444; AIR2009SC3098; 2009(4)AWC3171(SC); JT2009(8)SC515; 2009(8)SCALE545; (2009)7SCC372; 2009AIRSCW4984

order dated 26th March, 2007, allowed the application in part and in terms of Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989, directed the Union of India and its authorities to pay to the appellants herein compensation of Rs. 4 … was not interfered with by the Division Bench of the High Court upon reference to the provisions of Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Section 34 of the Civil Procedure Code.10. In the case of

Rajesh Anil and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(34), 137, 141 to 147, 150 to 157, 160 to 162, 164, 166, 168, 172 to 175, 179, 180D, 180E and 180F; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 167, 167(1), 190, 190(1), 192, 200, 202, 202(1), 202(2), 460, 461, 465, 465(2) and 482

Reported in : 2009CriLJ845

Matched in: Advocate V.V. Surendran and; P.A. Harish, Advs. Jai George, Public Prosecutor for Respondent No. 1 and; Alexander Thomas, S.C. for Railways for Respo

Dr. Urmila J. Sangani Vs. Pragjibhai Mohanlal Luvana and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166 and 168; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110B

Reported in : 2000ACJ1125; AIR2000Guj211; (2000)2GLR1281

groups of railway box wagons as one unit for the purpose of levying demurrage was ultra vires the Railways Act, 1890. In absence of pleading to that effect, the Trial Court did not frame any issue on that … Gujarat 134) and subsequent decision of the Bombay High Court reported in 1989 (2) Acc CJ 750?(3) If the claimant has not resorted to the … The learned Single Judge has, therefore, referred following questions for determination to the Larger Bench :--(1) Whether under Section 166 read with Section 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Section 110-B of the Motor Vehicles Act,

The Union of India, Reptd. By Its General Manager, South Western Railw ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

The amount in deposit is directed to be transmitted to the MACT forthwith. I.A.1/2012 is dismissed as Unnecessary. Railways Act, 1989 Section 125 Rail Accident Claim of compensation MACT, consequently held that in absence of evidence of respondent that driver … met with an accident involving the railway locomotive Chalukya Express , the claim petition by his widow, invoking Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for compensation, was maintainable. The bar under Section 125 of the Act

Geeta Devi vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the stake holders containing suggestions for amendment of the principal FAO222015 Page 1 of 9 enactment, viz., the Railways Act, 1989 and some directions for modifications of statutory Rules and consequently, mandating notifications in the Government Gazette to give … The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 which contains provisions for making claims before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, enable through Section 166 that the claims in cases of deaths can be made by legal representatives of the deceased. 2.3. As

S.K. Sharma Vs. the General Manager, Railway

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2007(2)MPLJ117

Railway Claims Tribunal/Mumbai at Bhopal in Case No. 626/97.2. An application was filed under Section 125 of the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') by appellant; S.K. Sharma claiming compensation of Rs. 1,40,000/- for the injuries … compensation amount - Interest reduced from 12% to 8% - Hence, petition allowed - MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988[C.A.No.59/1988] Section 166; [A.K. Patnaik, CJ, A.K. Gohil & S. Samvatsar, JJ] Application for compensation for personal injury Death of injured

Sh. Beant Singh Vs. Sh. Balwant Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

of India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nirmala Devi 1980 ACJ 55(SC); Brestu Ram v. Anant Ram and others, 1989 (2) Sim. L.C. 298 has held as under: 44 . Besides, the court is well advised to remember … a monthly income of Rs. 3000/- from agricultural work as well as dairy farming. 4. A petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 was filed claiming compensation of rupees six lacs. 5. In the joint

The Branch Manager vs Kumari Amrutha

Court : Karnataka

charge sheet. It is submitted that when the application is filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1989, the burden lies on the claimant to prove the accident and the involvement of the vehicle. It is

A Nagaraju vs Kumara P M

Court : Karnataka

injuries in a road traffic accident on 04.04.2018, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1989 to award just and propercompensation. The Tribunal awarded total compensation of Rs.3,49,000/- with interest at the rate of

The United India Insurance Co.Ltd. vs Shalumol,

Court : Kerala

appropriate if the definition of ‘dependant’ is identical under the three enactments namely, the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855, Railways Act, 1989 and Motor Vehicles Act,1988. Nonetheless, no action has been taken on the above recommendation, although the Act, 1988, … a vehicle. Shalumol and Malumol and their maternal grandparents, the respondents in the appeal, moved the Tribunal under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for brevity referred to as ‘Act, 1988’) claiming compensation from the insured