Advanced Search Results

TahazhaThe Purayil Sarabi and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 123, 123(2), 124, 124A and 127; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34 - Order 11, Rule 2; Interest Act, 1978 - Sections 3; Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 16; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act 1970; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 9; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 392

Reported in : 2009ACJ2444; AIR2009SC3098; 2009(4)AWC3171(SC); JT2009(8)SC515; 2009(8)SCALE545; (2009)7SCC372; 2009AIRSCW4984

order dated 26th March, 2007, allowed the application in part and in terms of Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989, directed the Union of India and its authorities to pay to the appellants herein compensation of Rs. 4 … was not interfered with by the Division Bench of the High Court upon reference to the provisions of Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Section 34 of the Civil Procedure Code.10. In the case of

Rajesh Anil and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(34), 137, 141 to 147, 150 to 157, 160 to 162, 164, 166, 168, 172 to 175, 179, 180D, 180E and 180F; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 167, 167(1), 190, 190(1), 192, 200, 202, 202(1), 202(2), 460, 461, 465, 465(2) and 482

Reported in : 2009CriLJ845

Matched in: Advocate V.V. Surendran and; P.A. Harish, Advs. Jai George, Public Prosecutor for Respondent No. 1 and; Alexander Thomas, S.C. for Railways for Respo

Dr. Urmila J. Sangani Vs. Pragjibhai Mohanlal Luvana and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166 and 168; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110B

Reported in : 2000ACJ1125; AIR2000Guj211; (2000)2GLR1281

groups of railway box wagons as one unit for the purpose of levying demurrage was ultra vires the Railways Act, 1890. In absence of pleading to that effect, the Trial Court did not frame any issue on that … Gujarat 134) and subsequent decision of the Bombay High Court reported in 1989 (2) Acc CJ 750?(3) If the claimant has not resorted to the … The learned Single Judge has, therefore, referred following questions for determination to the Larger Bench :--(1) Whether under Section 166 read with Section 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Section 110-B of the Motor Vehicles Act,

The Union of India, Reptd. By Its General Manager, South Western Railw ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

The amount in deposit is directed to be transmitted to the MACT forthwith. I.A.1/2012 is dismissed as Unnecessary. Railways Act, 1989 Section 125 Rail Accident Claim of compensation MACT, consequently held that in absence of evidence of respondent that driver … met with an accident involving the railway locomotive Chalukya Express , the claim petition by his widow, invoking Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for compensation, was maintainable. The bar under Section 125 of the Act

Geeta Devi vs.union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

the stake holders containing suggestions for amendment of the principal FAO222015 Page 1 of 9 enactment, viz., the Railways Act, 1989 and some directions for modifications of statutory Rules and consequently, mandating notifications in the Government Gazette to give … The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 which contains provisions for making claims before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, enable through Section 166 that the claims in cases of deaths can be made by legal representatives of the deceased. 2.3. As

S.K. Sharma Vs. the General Manager, Railway

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2007(2)MPLJ117

Railway Claims Tribunal/Mumbai at Bhopal in Case No. 626/97.2. An application was filed under Section 125 of the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') by appellant; S.K. Sharma claiming compensation of Rs. 1,40,000/- for the injuries … compensation amount - Interest reduced from 12% to 8% - Hence, petition allowed - MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988[C.A.No.59/1988] Section 166; [A.K. Patnaik, CJ, A.K. Gohil & S. Samvatsar, JJ] Application for compensation for personal injury Death of injured

Sh. Beant Singh Vs. Sh. Balwant Singh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

of India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nirmala Devi 1980 ACJ 55(SC); Brestu Ram v. Anant Ram and others, 1989 (2) Sim. L.C. 298 has held as under: 44 . Besides, the court is well advised to remember … a monthly income of Rs. 3000/- from agricultural work as well as dairy farming. 4. A petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 was filed claiming compensation of rupees six lacs. 5. In the joint

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

v. Jalgaon 158 AIR1967SC295(para 10, 27, 60 and64) 159 (1969) 1 SCC325(paras 7 to 9, 11 and13) 160 1989 (2) Supp. SCC201(paras 8, 9 and13) 161 (2002) 3 SCC496(para10) 162 AIR1961SC1519163 AIR1991SC1216(paras 6 to10) 164 (supra at … to10) 164 (supra at 46, paras 22 and23) 165 (1975) 2 SCC818(para3) 166 1995 Supp (1) SCC434(para11) 167 2019 SCCOnline SC1144(paras 8 to 16, 19, … Parliament commensurate with modern safety norms; and (xiv) To preserve the built heritage by not undertaking aggressive reconstruction activity on graded heritage structures on which only minimum renovation measures are permissible in law.9. Before we begin the … 229 d) Procedure during decision- 230-265 making process and Public Hearing under Section 11A e) Quasi Legislative Function 266-273 f) Post change in land use

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Satish Patidar and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 17, 123, 123C and 124A; Railways (Amendment) Act, 1994; Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 17 and 17(1)

Reported in : 2003ACJ2081; AIR2003MP205; 2003(4)MPLJ306

is barred by limitation. It was also contended by the Union of India that Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 1989), providing for compensation on account of an untoward incident was … High Court of Himachal Pradesh, in the context of deletion of provisions in respect of limitation under Section 166(3) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, has held that a claim, time barred before corning into force of the

M/S Kalpataru Agroforest Enterprises Vs. Union of India

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 18, 18(1) and (3), 23, 30 and 30(2); Railway Claims Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1989 - Rules 20, 32 and 32(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order XLVII, Rules 1 and 2; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 74

Reported in : 2001(4)MPHT76

paid by the appellant and title to goods had passed to the consignee under Section 74 of the Railways Act, 1989 (henceforth 'the Act') and, consequently, the appellant could not file the claim for refund of excess of freight.8. … rejected.2. This appeal involves common question of facts and law with connected Misc. Appeal Nos. 161/99, 163/99, 164/99, 166/99 and 167/99 between the same parties. For this reason the disposal of this appeal on merits shall govern