Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: railways act 1989 section 160 · Page 1 of about 127 results (0.049 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 01 2004

i.T.C. Limited Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Dec-01-2004

Subject : CriminalCompany

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 160(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 451 and 457

Reported in : 2005CriLJ1582; 2005(I)OLR122

truck along with the 400 cartoons of cigarette was seized and a case under Section 160(2) of the Railways Act, 1989 was registered against the driver of the vehicle on the complaint made by the Assistant Sub-Inspector of Railway

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 17 2008

Rajesh Anil and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-17-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(34), 137, 141 to 147, 150 to 157, 160 to 162, 164, 166, 168, 172 to 175, 179, 180D, 180E and 180F; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 167, 167(1), 190, 190(1), 192, 200, 202, 202(1), 202(2), 460, 461, 465, 465(2) and 482

Reported in : 2009CriLJ845

Matched in: Advocate V.V. Surendran and; P.A. Harish, Advs. Jai George, Public Prosecutor for Respondent No. 1 and; Alexander Thomas, S.C. for Railways for Respo

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2019

Nagaraj Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-21-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

Stations. Due to the said hit, the railway crossing gate was broken. 2 5. Section 160(2) of the Railways Act, 1989 provides that if any person breaks any gate or chain or barrier set up on either side of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 07 2024

State of Karnataka vs Mahagundappa

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Jun-07-2024

JMFC, BAGALKOT IN C.C.NO.1279/2012 AND CONVICT THE RESPONDENT / ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 160(2) OF RAILWAYS ACT 2003 AND ETC., -2- THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:JUDGMENTThe … has submitted chargesheet against the accused person for commission of offence punishable under Section 160(2) of the Railway Act, 1989. After filing of chargesheet, cogent action was taken against the accused, case was registered in C.C.No.1279/2012, summons was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 2025

Tamilmani vs the Union of India Rep by,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-14-2025

respondent has registered a case in Crime No.9 of 2018, for offence under Sections 147 and 174(a) of Railways Act, 1989. On completion of investigation, charge sheet has been filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Coimbatore.3. Heard the … the final report has been filed merely indicating that a group of 160 people gathered and made a protest. Except naming few, their identity has … Podanur, Southern Railway, (Crime No.9 of 2018)2. Kana Ram Yadav ..... RespondentsPrayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to call for the records in C.C.No.281 of 2018 on the file of learned Judicial

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 2008

Cbocs West, Inc. Vs. Humphries

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-27-2008

Subject : Land Acquisition

by other citizens. See, e.g., Runyon v. McCrary , 427 U. S. 160 , 183, 197, 190. (3) In 1989, Patterson v. McLean Credit Union … discrimination impairs an existing contractual relationship”); Patterson v. McLean Credit Union , 491 U. S. 164 , 171 (1989) (“[Section] 1981 ‘prohibits racial discrimination in the making and enforcement of private contracts’ ” (quoting Runyon v. McCrary , … managers that a black co-employee was also dismissed for race-based reasons, respondent Humphries filed suit charging that CBOCS’ actions violated both Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U. S. C. §1981, the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 12 2024

Smt. Khaja Bee vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-12-2024

they contend that claim does not come under ambit of Section 123 (c) or Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989. The injured applicant was not a bonafide passenger and the incident in question has not occurred in the … FILED U/S 23(1) OF RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ACT AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 05.11.2015 PASSED IN OA II U 160/2009 ON THE FILE OF THE RAILWAY CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE BENCH, DISMISSING THE APPLICATION FOR COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 02 2025

K.Binu vs Union of India

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-02-2025

compensation under Section 16 of Railway Tribunal Act, 1987 r/w Section 123 (c )(2), 124-A & 125 of Railways Act, 1989. After considering oral and documentary evidence, the tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs.1,00,000/-. Challenging the same, the appellant … OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 02-07-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI1. K.Binu S/o. Kunjan, Sasthan Villazhi, Fathima Nagar, Kanyakumari Dist 629 160 Appellant(s) Vs1. Union Of India Owning Southern Railway, Rep by its General Manager, Chennai 3 Respondent(s)PRAYER To set

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 23 2025

Smt.Aaswathamma vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-23-2025

deceased. But the deceased succumbed to the injuries on 06.09.2003.2010 SCC OnLine Kar 5098 -7-17. The fact that Railways Act is a beneficialpiece of legislation cannot be lost sight of by this Court and it should receive a … plea of negligence of the victim as a contributing factor."9. As per Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989,the compensation is to be payable on the principle of strict liability. Therefore, the applicants have proved their claim … (MOBILE NO.8843828770) -2- R/O CHAKKERE, CHANNAPATNA, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE - 562 160. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. NARENDRA BABU B. K., ADVOCATE) AND: UNION OF INDIA

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 08 2024

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification versus M/S Eci Spic S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-08-2024

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : [2024]11S.C.R.2173; (2025) 4 SCC 641

ECI-SPIC-SMOMCML (JV) A Joint Venture Company [2019] 16 SCR 1234 is unequal and prejudiced in favour of the Railways. [Para 169(d)] Constitution of India - Art. 14 - Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Whether unilateral appointment … and Joseph E. Neuhaus, A Guide to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, at 479 (Kluwer 1989); 246th Report of the Law Commission. List of Acts In the Judgment of Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, … 485 (6th Cir. 2004); Board of Ed. v. W. Harley Miller, Inc. 160 W. Va. 473, 236 S.E.2d 439 (W. Va. 1977); Sumukan Ltd. v. … [Per Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. (concurring)] The text and the context of Section 18 as is evident from the scheme of the Act eschews application

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial