Advanced Search Results

Pushpaben Jitendrakumar Shah and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 47, 63, 93, 101, 109 and 109(1); Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 47, 47(1), 66(1), 67, 67(1), 67(2), Rules 95, 96, 102, 114, 115, 115(b), 120, 121, 128, 129, 130, 131, 137, 138, 150 and 163

Reported in : II(2005)ACC185; 2005ACJ191; AIR2004Guj370; (2004)3GLR2206

was applicable in the instant case, since the accident occurred prior to the coming into force of the Railways Act, 1989), the railway administration was bound to fix and display the maximum number of passengers that may be carried … passengers had got into the train. The Court referred to the Rules 150, 120, 130, 131 and 137 of the General Rules framed under Section … chaos and passengers were 'fighting their best to get into the train'. The passengers were sitting on joining sections between the two compartments and some were sitting even on outer part of the windows of the compartments

Rajesh Anil and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(34), 137, 141 to 147, 150 to 157, 160 to 162, 164, 166, 168, 172 to 175, 179, 180D, 180E and 180F; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 167, 167(1), 190, 190(1), 192, 200, 202, 202(1), 202(2), 460, 461, 465, 465(2) and 482

Reported in : 2009CriLJ845

Matched in: Advocate V.V. Surendran and; P.A. Harish, Advs. Jai George, Public Prosecutor for Respondent No. 1 and; Alexander Thomas, S.C. for Railways for Respo

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Nilkanth Tulsidas Bhatia and 7 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 113, 114, 115, 119, 122, 141, 150 and 153; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 147, 148, 149, 153A, 164, 302, 307 and 436; Prevention of Terrorists Act, 2002 - Sections 32; Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(4), 5(2), 5(5) and 11; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100; The Madras Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Parent Act - Sections 119; Criminal Law; Constitution of India - Articles 73 and 226; Statutory Investigation into Railway Accidents Rules, 1998 - Rules 2(6) and 4

Reported in : (2006)2GLR952

read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 141, 150 and 153 of the Indian Railways Act, 1989. Later on, the provisions of the Prevention of Terrorists Act, 2002 were also invoked and after filing of

Periyasami Vs. State Tr.insp.of Police

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the TADA, Sections 3 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, under Section 150(2) (b) of the Railways Act, 1989 and under Section 3 read with Section 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act and

Babu Nm vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

is the accused in Crime No.891/2023 of Koyilandy Police Station, Kozhikode District, for having committed offences punishable under Section 150 of the Railway Act, 1989.3. The allegation against the petitioner is that on 24.8.2023, the petitioner allegedly placed

Mahendra Prasad and Anr Vs. Union of India Rep. by G.M. Ea

Court : Jharkhand

Subject : Land Acquisition

by the appellants. Thereafter, claim petition was filed before the Railway Claims Tribunal under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 for getting compensation of Rs.4,00,000/-, but, the said application was dismissed, as not maintainable vide judgment dated 14.09.2009

Smt. S. Devamma @ Devi Bai W/O Samya Naik and Thriveni D/O Samya Naik ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1989 - Sections 16, 123, 124 and 124A; Railway Act, 1989 - Sections 123 and 124A; Railway (Amendment) Act

Reported in : 2009ACJ2427; ILR2009KAR472; 2009(2)KarLJ683:2009(1)KCCR268:2009(3)AIRKarR102:AIR2009NOC780

case on hand, the untoward accident was of the year 2001 i.e. subsequent to the amendment of the Railways Act, 1989. At the time of accident, the claimants were entitled for compensation of Rs. 4,00,000/- and death was due … of filing the application.2. An application was filed by the mother and sister of the deceased as per Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1989 (for short 'the Act') seeking to award compensation of Rs. … According to the learned Counsel appearing fox the respondent-Railways, there is a 150 Kens distance restriction for issue of season tickets. But, according to the

M. Srinivas Reddy, S/O Late Narsimha Reddy, Hindu, Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 23; Railway Protection Force (Amendment) Act, 2003; Railway Property (Unlawful Possession) Act, 1966 - Sections 179; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(34), 150 to 152; Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1) and 10; Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rules 80 and 170(1)(99); Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16

Reported in : 2004(5)ALT197

fide passenger and that they are entitled to be paid compensation in accordance with the provisions of the Railways Act.3. The appellant filed a written statement. It has denied the very occurrence of accident, resulting in the … G. Yethirajulu, J.1. This appeal is preferred under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, (for short 'the Act') by the Union of India, aggrieved

Subbanna Shetty Vs. Sarojini

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110; Tariff Regulations

Reported in : 1994ACJ457; ILR1993KAR3061; 1994(1)KarLJ131

of the third party nor any separate premium paid for that purpose to create such liability. - INDIAN RAILWAYS ACT (24 OF 1989) Sections 59 & 51(2): [P.D. Dinakaran, C.J. & K.L. Manjunath, J] Supply of tickets Petitioner … 50,000/-. In the instant case, additional payment of Rs. 100/- and Rs. 150/- would cover unlimited risk for personal injury to the extent of Rs. … the column dealing with limits of liability in Exh. NA-1, it is provided that the Company's liability under Section 11-1(i) and Section 11-1(ii) would be Rs. 50,000/-. These Sections indicate the liability in relation to third parties

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

v. Jalgaon 158 AIR1967SC295(para 10, 27, 60 and64) 159 (1969) 1 SCC325(paras 7 to 9, 11 and13) 160 1989 (2) Supp. SCC201(paras 8, 9 and13) 161 (2002) 3 SCC496(para10) 162 AIR1961SC1519163 AIR1991SC1216(paras 6 to10) 164 (supra at … this argument could be understood by reproducing the following extract form para 150 of the written submissions: “150. ...The present project represents not a radical … Parliament commensurate with modern safety norms; and (xiv) To preserve the built heritage by not undertaking aggressive reconstruction activity on graded heritage structures on which only minimum renovation measures are permissible in law.9. Before we begin the … 229 d) Procedure during decision- 230-265 making process and Public Hearing under Section 11A e) Quasi Legislative Function 266-273 f) Post change in land use