Advanced Search Results
Pratap S/O Ramrao More Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Mar-14-2001
Criminal
Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 145 and 146; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 341 and 506
2001ALLMR(Cri)1887; 2001CriLJ2721
and learned A.P.P. for non-applicant.2. The applicant was convicted for offence under Sections 145 and 146 of the Railways Act, 1989 and was sentenced to 20 days simple imprisonment on each count as also fine of Rs. 400/- on … of imagination, the complainant (PW.1) can be said to be on official duty. The question of application of Section 146 of the Railways act, which provides that if any person wilfully obstructs or prevents any railway servant in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Thanikachalam and Others Vs. The Union of India owning Southern Rai ...
Chennai
Jun-03-2016
Land Acquisition
Civil Miscellaneous Appeals under Section 23(1) of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 read with Section 16 of Railways Act, 1989, against the orders dated 10.09.2008 and 29.4.2008 made in O.A.Nos.51 and 121 of 2006 respectively on the file … judgment of this Court in the case of Rajathi and others v. Union of India, 2001 (1) TLNJ 146, wherein it has been held that the burden lies upon the Railway to prove that the deceased was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Peddanna Vs. Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protection F ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jan-30-2006
Service
Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(1); Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 - Rule 146.4
2006(2)ALD560; 2006(4)ALT631; [2006(109)FLR784]
caste, and thereby committed an offence punishable under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short 'the Act'). The same has been taken up as P.R.C. No. 154 of 2001 on the … respondent, the circumstances that led to the initiation of disciplinary proceedings are narrated. It is stated that Rule 146.4 of Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987 (for short 'RPF Rules') is attracted, inasmuch as the petitioner has brought
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Anil Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
Jan-09-2013
Education
day of January, 2013) The applicant was convicted for the offence punishable under sections 146, 147 of Indian Railways Act, 1989 by the learned Special Railway Magistrate, Khandwa in criminal case No.508/2006 vide judgment dated 9.8.2012 and fine of … ORDER (Passed on the 9th day of January, 2013) The applicant was convicted for the offence punishable under sections 146, 147 of Indian Railways Act, 1989 by the learned Special Railway Magistrate, Khandwa in criminal case No.508/2006
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNaseema K.N vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Jul-22-2024
34 of the IPC, W.P. (Crl.) No. 597 of 2024 :4:and Sections 146, and 147 of the Railway Act, 1989. The detenu is arrayed as the 2nd accused in the said case. The specific allegation is that on … (the detenu). This Writ Petition is filed challenging Ext.P2 order of detention passed by the 2nd respondent under Section 3(1) of the Kerala Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 2007. The prayer in this writ petition is to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjay Tirkey. Vs. the State of Jharkhand.
Jharkhand Ranchi
Apr-25-2011
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 325, 307, 353, 34; Railway Act - Sections 145, 146, 147; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 162
the Special Court of Railway Judicial Magistrate having territorial jurisdiction. Accordingly, the case for the offence alleged under Railways Act against the accused by filing a complaint was lodged before the Special Court of Railway Judicial Magistrate and … was lodged on 04.08.2008 before the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi under Sections 145/146 and 147 of the Railway Act, 1989.3. Learned Counsel Mr. Pratius Lala submitted that for the same set of occurrence a different case giving rise … P.S. Case No.125 of 2008 on 04.08.2008 for the alleged offence under Sections 143/147/148/341/323/325/307/353/34 of the Indian Penal Code which was numbered as G.R.No.2976 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion Of India Vs. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd
Supreme Court of India
Mar-21-2024
Land Acquisition
ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 22 i. Relevant Statutory Scheme and Provisions .............................................. 22 ii. Scope of Section 106 of the Railways Act, 1989 ........................................ 29 a. What is meant by an “Overcharge”?. ....................................................... 35 b. Concept of an ‘Overcharge’ and an … the corrected distance/ rate between BAD to HSR as 333.18 km on 05.07.2005 (i.e. Annexure P-3 @ Pg. 146 of SLP). This notification of corrected distance made the earlier realization of freight for 444 km under the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India
Supreme Court of India
Jan-05-2021
Land Acquisition
v. Jalgaon 158 AIR1967SC295(para 10, 27, 60 and64) 159 (1969) 1 SCC325(paras 7 to 9, 11 and13) 160 1989 (2) Supp. SCC201(paras 8, 9 and13) 161 (2002) 3 SCC496(para10) 162 AIR1961SC1519163 AIR1991SC1216(paras 6 to10) 164 (supra at … 144 (2011) 9 SCC1(para59) 145 (2009) SCCOnline Del 487 (paras 7 to9) 146 (supra at 17, paras 27, 31 and35) 147 (2005) 6 SCC321(paras 6 … Parliament commensurate with modern safety norms; and (xiv) To preserve the built heritage by not undertaking aggressive reconstruction activity on graded heritage structures on which only minimum renovation measures are permissible in law.9. Before we begin the … 229 d) Procedure during decision- 230-265 making process and Public Hearing under Section 11A e) Quasi Legislative Function 266-273 f) Post change in land use
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskInspector, Railway Protection Force, Kottayam versus Mathew K Cherian ...
Supreme Court of India
Jan-09-2025
Land Acquisition
[2025]1S.C.R.498
to procure and supply online tickets through IRCTC portal would constitute an offence under Section 143 of the Railways Act, 1989. Headnotes† Railways Act, 1989 - s.143 - In the first of the appeal (lead appeal), M was accused … been the legislative intent. [Para 26] Case Law Cited Senior Electric Inspector v. Laxminarayan Chopra [1962] SCR 3 146 : AIR 1962 SC 159; Dharani Sugars and Chemicals Ltd. v. Union of India [2019] 6 SCR 307
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Narayan Singh Vs. the Election Commission and ors.
Patna
Feb-27-1996
InsuranceMotor Vehicles
before the Gauhati High Court in the case of Sita Rani Gupta v. State of Assam and Ors. 1989 ACJ 348 : I (1989) ACC 21 (DB), in the matter relating to payment under Workmen's Compensation Act. … There is no dispute that in view of Sub-section (1) of Section 94 of the M.V. Act, 1939 (Section 146 of the M.V. Act, 1988), no person can use or allow any other person to use the motor
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »