Advanced Search Results

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Mukesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Railway Act, 1989 - Sections 143(1), 143(2) and 186; Evidence Act - Sections 30; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 313; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 107

Reported in : [2007(1)JCR317(SC)]; 2006(10)SCALE346

We, therefore, do not intend to interfere therewith. The appeal is dismissed. Criminal - Abetment- Section 143 of Railways Act, 1989 and Section 107of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 107 - Respondents were Railway reservation clerks - They

Munna Kumar Vs. State Through N.C.T. of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 143 and 180D; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973

Reported in : 120(2005)DLT110; 2005(83)DRJ92

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. The offence alleged against the petitioner is one under Section 143 of the Railways Act, 1989. The learned counsel for the petitioner points out that in view of Section 180D of the said Act

M.K. Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 142 and 143; Authorisation of Railway Travellers' Service Agents Rules, 1985 - Rules 4, 6 and 7; Constitution of India

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT220; 2008(105)DRJ685

Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking, inter alia, a declaration that Section 142 and 143 of the Railways Act, 1989 is ultra vires of the Constitution of India. However, during the course of submissions, petitioner has not pressed

Inspector, Railway Protection Force, Kottayam versus Mathew K Cherian ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]1S.C.R.498

to procure and supply online tickets through IRCTC portal would constitute an offence under Section 143 of the Railways Act, 1989. Headnotes† Railways Act, 1989 - s.143 - In the first of the appeal (lead appeal), M was accused

Rajesh Anil and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(34), 137, 141 to 147, 150 to 157, 160 to 162, 164, 166, 168, 172 to 175, 179, 180D, 180E and 180F; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 2, 167, 167(1), 190, 190(1), 192, 200, 202, 202(1), 202(2), 460, 461, 465, 465(2) and 482

Reported in : 2009CriLJ845

Matched in: Advocate V.V. Surendran and; P.A. Harish, Advs. Jai George, Public Prosecutor for Respondent No. 1 and; Alexander Thomas, S.C. for Railways for Respo

Ajay Tirkey. Vs. the State of Jharkhand.

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 323, 325, 307, 353, 34; Railway Act - Sections 145, 146, 147; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 162

the Special Court of Railway Judicial Magistrate having territorial jurisdiction. Accordingly, the case for the offence alleged under Railways Act against the accused by filing a complaint was lodged before the Special Court of Railway Judicial Magistrate and … was lodged on 04.08.2008 before the Railway Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi under Sections 145/146 and 147 of the Railway Act, 1989.3. Learned Counsel Mr. Pratius Lala submitted that for the same set of occurrence a different case giving rise … P.S. Case No.125 of 2008 on 04.08.2008 for the alleged offence under Sections 143/147/148/341/323/325/307/353/34 of the Indian Penal Code which was numbered as G.R.No.2976 of

M/S Stelling Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (railyatri.in) and Anr. Vs.indian ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

later stage when a large number of customers have been cheated of their money.33. Reliance is placed on Section 143 of the Railways Act, 1989 to state that all activities pertaining to sale of railway tickets including the … not understood the nature of petitioner‟s business; that the petitioner No.1 had not violated any provisions of the Railways Act, 1989; its reply to the Cyber Crime Cell and illegal pressurizing of Paytm. The petitioner No.1 further called upon

Gaurav Dahake Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Right to Information

Chief Metropolitan Magistrate/Special Metropolitan Magistrate (Railways), Bangalore in C.C.No.3401 of 2023 taking cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 143 of the Railways Act, 1989 (‘the Act’ for short). 32. Heard Sri Rohan Kothari, learned counsel appearing for … REPORT BEARING NO.895/2020 DATED3009.2023 (ANNEXURE-A) FILED BY THE YESHWANTHPUR RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S1432) OF THE RAILWAYS ACT, 1989 AND ETC., THIS CRIMINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR ORDERS ON0808.2024, COMING ON FOR PRONOUNCEMENT THIS

Choti Beti vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

was neither a bona fide passenger, nor was the alleged incident an “untoward incident” as defined under the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”).3. The brief facts of the case, as stated in the claim application, … Sharma and Mr. Rajneesh Sharma, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 23 of the RailwayClaims Tribunal Act, 1987 against the judgment dated 31.01.2025, passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, … Reserved on : 07.04.2026Pronounced on : 08.04.2026Uploaded on : 08.04.2026 + FAO 143/2025 CHOTI BETI .....Appellant Through: Ms. Ananya Mago, Mr. Kshitiz Jain and Mr.

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Smt. Laxmipati and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 13; Railway Claims Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1989 - Rule 1; Railway Accidents (Compensation) Rules, 1989 - Rule 1; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34

Reported in : 1995ACJ644; AIR1995MP90; 1995(0)MPLJ28

of 1983 enhancing the limit of compensation to Rs. 1 lac.4. The 1890 Act was replaced by Indian Railways Act, 1989. The Act does not contain any provisions regarding compensation. The Act does not incorporate the provisions noticed above … and died. First respondent, for herself and on behalf of her two minor children, filed an application Under Section 82(A) of the Indian Railways Act, 1890, before the Claims Commissioner appointed Under Section 82(B) of the Act … respondent's husband, late of S. C. Pati, was travelling in Train No. 143 U. P. Kalinga Express on 15-9-1984. Between Zalwara and Katni Railway Stations,