Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: railways act 1989 section 142 · Page 1 of about 170 results (0.042 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 06 2008

M.K. Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-06-2008

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 142 and 143; Authorisation of Railway Travellers' Service Agents Rules, 1985 - Rules 4, 6 and 7; Constitution of India

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT220; 2008(105)DRJ685

Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking, inter alia, a declaration that Section 142 and 143 of the Railways Act, 1989 is ultra vires of the Constitution of India. However, during the course of submissions, petitioner has not pressed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1999

Syed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-07-1999

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD689

Matched in: Advocate Mr. P. Radha Krishna, Adv. Mr. D. Srinivas, SC for Railways

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 1991

Union Carbide Corporation, Etc., Etc. Vs. Union of India, Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-03-1991

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 32, 53, 131A, 136, 137, 139A, 141, 142(1),144A, 145 and 361(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9, 112, 144, 151 and 302 - Order 1, Rule 8(4) - Order 23, Rule 3-B - Order 6, Rule 1; Supreme Court Rules - Order 32 - Order 29, Rules 10 and 11; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 35, 107, 120B, 304, 324, 326, 420, 429, 465, 468 and 477; Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing of Claims) Act, 1985 - Sections 4; Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1952 - Sections 7(2); Supreme Court Act, 1981 - Sections 32A; Federal Rules of Procedure (CPC) - Rule 23; Congenital Disabilities (Civil Liability) Act, 1976 - Sections 1(1)

Reported in : I(1992)ACC332; AIR1992SC248; (1991)3CompLJ213(SC); JT1991(6)SC8; 1991(2)SCALE675; (1991)4SCC584; [1991]Supp1SCR251; 1992(1)LC505(SC)

is in these cases that the matter was settled by two orders dated 14th and 15th of February, 1989. On May 4, 1989, the Constitution Bench which had recorded the settlement proceeded to set out brief reasons … many of the affected persons. The Union of India under the Bhopal Gas Leak Disaster (Processing of Claims) Act of 1985 took upon itself the right to sue for compensation on behalf of the affected parties and … manifestation of the effects of the exposure is such that a vast section of the exposed population is put at risk and the potential risk … Durga Shankar Mehta v. Thakur Raghuraj Singh and Ors. : [1955]1SCR267 .Article 142(1) of the Constitution provides:142 (1) The Supreme Court in exercise of its

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 12 1988

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. M. Thankaraj and Etc. Etc.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-1988

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 124A, 126 and 129; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 5, 22, 24 and 24A; Railways Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990 - Rule 3(4); Railways Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) (Amendment) Rules, 1997; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34

Reported in : 2000ACJ651; AIR2000Ker91

Claims Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench granting compensation for death or personal injuries of passengers under the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989 read with Rules issued thereunder. Except M.F.A. No. 915/98 all the other appeals are at the Instance of … consider the common question of law and thereafter deal with the factual contentions raised in each case separately.2. Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989 provides for liability of Railway administration for loss occasioned by the death … Bench granted compensation in O.A. No. 137/97, O.A. No. 24/96, O.A. No. 142/97, O.A. No. 136/97, O.A. No. 124 of 1997, T.A. No. 56/97, O.A.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2014

Smt. Ram Payari Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-31-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

applicants to prove the untoward incident, within the meaning of section 123(c) read with Section 124-A of the Railways Act. In this connection, a reference may be made to a decision of Hon’ble Delhi High Court titled as … per the meaning of the expression as found in Section 123(c) and Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989.7. So far as the first aspect that no train ticket is filed, I may add that it is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 08 1996

Naginimara Veneer and Saw Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of I ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-08-1996

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 2(25), 117, 139 142(1), 142(2), 143, 147 and 148

despatch orders/instructions to be issued by the Forest Utilisation Officer. The sleepers were for use by the Indian Railways. As per the arrangement, the petitioner used to receive advance payment from time to time in respect of … 226 of the Constitution has challenged annexure-5 notice, dated March 30/ 31, 1989, issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Assessment), Special Range-II, Guwahati, in … prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner and also supplying the particulars that may be prescribed.21. Under Section 142 of the Act for the purpose of making an assessment under the Act, the Income-tax Officer may serve

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 2007

Association for Protection of Democratic Rights Vs. State of West Beng ...

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Nov-16-2007

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 3, 5, 6; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 129 to 132, 144, 145, 154, 156(3) and 173; ;Arms Act - Sections 25, 27 and 35; ;Police Act, 1861 - Section 12; ;Delhi Police Act, 1946 - Sections 2(3), 5 and 6; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 141, 147, 148, 149, 186, 302, 307, 320, 321, 332, 333, 341, 349, 353, 482 and 506; ;IE Act - Section 9; ;PDPP Act - Section 3(2); ;Government of India Act, 1943 - Section 204(2); ;Madras Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949 - Section 9(1A); ;Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 14, 16, 19, 19(1), 19(2), 21, 32, 136, 137, 142, 142(1), 162, 226, 227, 300A, 372 and 395; ;Crown Proceedings Act, 1947; ;Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act, 1945; ;Mot

Reported in : 2007(4)CHN842

65, stated that the view expressed by the Supreme Court in L. Robert D'Souza v. Executive Engineer, Southern Railways AIR 1982 SC 854 : 1982 Lab. IC 811 has now been referred to a Larger Bench and, … case of State of Maharashtra v. Captain Buddhikota Subha Rao reported in 1989 Supp (2) SCC 605 (para-7). In this case the power of the … same power as the Supreme Court under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. In cases involving … its own Motion1(c). All the newspapers throughout the Nation have today carried as a lead Article-description of the action which has been taken by the West Bengal Police against agitating farmers and other villagers in Nandigram village. … is, however, stated that at stage no orders had been issued under Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code Act. The police personnel are stated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 1989

Consol. Rail Corp. Vs. Ry. Labor Execs.' Ass'n

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-19-1989

Subject : Land Acquisition

491 U. S. 299 (1989) ĽConsolidated Rail Corporation v. ĽRailway Labor Executives' Association ĽNo. 88-1 ĽArgued February 28, 1989 ĽDecided June 19, 1989 Ľ491 U.S. 299 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD … & T. S. L. R. Co. v. Transportation Union, 396 U. S. 142 (1969) (upholding status quo injunction without discussing equitable constraints); Division No. 1, … whether Conrail's drug testing program gives rise to a "major" or a "minor" dispute under the Railway Labor Act (RLA). Held: 1. Where an employer asserts a contractual right to take a contested action, the ensuing dispute … in agreements except in the manner prescribed in such agreements or in section 6." § 2 Seventh (emphasis added). Stated more simply, the Union's position

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 19 1991

N. and W. Ry. Vs. TraIn Dispatchers

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-19-1991

Subject : Land Acquisition

adverse effect on competition among rail carriers in the affected region." [ Footnote 2 ] On September 9, 1989, the Commission also filed a petition for rehearing, and requested the court to refrain from ruling on the … Toledo Shore Line R. Co. v. United Transportation Union, 396 U. S. 142 , 396 U. S. 156 (1969), the RLA is the law that, … has approved a rail carrier consolidation under the conditions set forth in Chapter 113 of the Interstate Commerce Act (Act), 49 U.S.C. § 11301 et seq., a carrier in such a consolidation "is exempt from the antitrust … such as those governing contracts, the court declined to decide whether the section could operate to override provisions of the Railway Labor Act (RLA) governing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2021

Rajeev Suri Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-05-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

v. Jalgaon 158 AIR1967SC295(para 10, 27, 60 and64) 159 (1969) 1 SCC325(paras 7 to 9, 11 and13) 160 1989 (2) Supp. SCC201(paras 8, 9 and13) 161 (2002) 3 SCC496(para10) 162 AIR1961SC1519163 AIR1991SC1216(paras 6 to10) 164 (supra at … v. State of Punjab157, Barium Chemicals Ltd. & Anr. v. Company Law 142 (2001) 5 SCC486(paras 11 and16) 143 (2010) 8 SCC372(paras 13, 20 to … Parliament commensurate with modern safety norms; and (xiv) To preserve the built heritage by not undertaking aggressive reconstruction activity on graded heritage structures on which only minimum renovation measures are permissible in law.9. Before we begin the … 229 d) Procedure during decision- 230-265 making process and Public Hearing under Section 11A e) Quasi Legislative Function 266-273 f) Post change in land use

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial