Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Hari Singh and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Service

Acts : Administrative Tribunal Act - Section 19; ;Indian Railway Act, 1989 - Sections 130 and 132; ;Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; ;Limitation Act - Section 5; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 47, Rule 1

hours a day. In this context, attention of the court was invited to Sections 130, 132 of the Railways Act, 1989, Report of Railway Labour Tribunal 1969, Circular No. E/487/Vol.IV, dated 26th June, 1992 as well as other materials.12. … 1, Hari Singh, and 14 others as applicants, approached the learned Central Administrative Tribunal with an application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act. They sought for direction upon the authorities for giving them the Overtime

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Rajkot Municipal Corporation

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 285 and 285(1); Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 - Sections 127, 129, 130, 131 and 132; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Rules - Rules 39, 40 and 45(1); ;Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 135, 135(1) and 135(4); Railways (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 184(1) and 184(4)

Reported in : AIR2003Guj87; (2002)3GLR904

the property occupied by the railway is concerned, there was no notification issued under Section 184(1) of the Railways Act, 1989, which corresponded to Section 135(1) of the Act of 1890. According to the petitioner, there was also no … 131 provides that conservancy tax shall be levied on the premises indicated therein. General tax is leviable under Section 132 in respect of all buildings and lands, as stated therein. Under Section 132(1), the general tax is not

M.S. Associates Vs. Uoi

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Direct Taxation

been finalized from time to time after due scrutiny. In pursuance of the warrants of authorisation issued under section 132 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the business premises of the petitioner firm

M.S. Associates, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1931; Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 120, 132, 132(1), 147, 158BB, 158BC, 158BD and 246A; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 75; Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(17); Parliament Act; Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(4), 24, 34(1), 37(1), 131(1) and 142(1); Information Technology Act, 2000 - Sections 2(1); Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 26; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154; Legislative Assembly Rules - Rule 235; Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 32, 74(2), 105, 148, 149, 150, 151(2), 194, 194(3), 226 and 226(2)

been finalised from time to time after due scrutiny. In pursuance of the warrants of authorisation issued under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the business premises of the petitioner firm as

M.S. Associates, Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Indian Partnership Act, 1931; ;Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 120, 132, 132(1), 147, 158BB, 158BC, 158BD and 246A; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 74 and 75; ;Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Section 2(17); ;Parliament Act; ;Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(4), 24, 34(1), 37(1), 131(1) and 142(1); ;Information Technology Act, 2000 - Section 2(1); ;Constitution of India (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 - Section 26; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Section 154; ;Legislative Assembly Rules - Rule 235; ;Constitution of India (42nd Amendment) Act; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 31, 32, 74(2), 105, 148, 149, 150, 151(2), 194, 194(3), 226 and 226(2)

Reported in : (2005)196CTR(Gau)318,[2005]275ITR502(Gauhati)

been finalised from time to time after due scrutiny. In pursuance of the warrants of authorisation issued under Section 132 of the Income-tax Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the business premises of the petitioner firm as

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Q.S. Shipchandler and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 43; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 17

Reported in : 2002(2)ALLMR890; 2002(3)BomCR430; (2002)3BOMLR671; 2002(2)MhLj896

Tribunal, as there is a bar of jurisdiction as per the provisions of Section 43 of the Indian Railways Act, 1989. Mr. Samant for petitioner has further submitted that the impugned Judgment is dated 25th September, 1990 and after … Indian Railways Act, 1989. - [Couto; M.L. Pendse, JJ.] In the first instance the order passed under s. 132(5) is an order of a summary nature and does not conclude the rights of the petitioners, because while

M/S. Ambika Fashion Pvt. Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

Subject : Railway

Acts : Railways Act - Sections 106, 103, 102(d)

were framed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, for determination:-1. Whether there was valid claim under Section 106 of Railways Act, 1989?2. Whether the railways are absolved of its liability for any indirect or consequential loss under Section 102(d) of … second question is answered in affirmative. (vi) The Joint Survey Report as in Ex.B-4 clearly admits non-delivery of 132 kgs. and to that extent, the Railway is liable. The third question is answered accordingly. (vii) The liability

Sri S Hareesh Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

Bearing Areas Acquisition and Development Act, 1957 (20 of 1957).12. The Electricity Act, 2003 (36 of 2003).13. The Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989).” 52. Therefore, Parliament itself has listed the Central enactments to which 2013 Act does not … ABOUT36YEARS, MUDDALINGANAHALLI VILLAGE, THYAMGONDALU HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 132. SRI S. GURUPRASAD S/O. LATE N. SHANTHARAM, AGED ABOUT37YEARS, NO.24, 13TH CROSS, … DTD.15.07.1982 VIDE ANNEX-C AND FINAL NOTIFICATION DTD.16.08.1985 ISSUED BY R-1 VIDE ANNEX-D IS DEEMED TO HAVE LAPSED UNDER SECTION242) OF THE RIGHT TO FAIR COMPENSATION AND TRANSPARENCY IN LAND ACQUISITION, REHABILITATION AND RESETTLEMENT ACT, 2013 AND ETC.,

Sh. Surai Besra Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

in an untoward incident (within the meaning of the expression in Section 123(c) and Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989) on 16.8.2010. The untoward incident took place while the deceased Sh. Hari Besra was travelling in North East

Exnora International Rep. by Its General Secretary Vs. the Government ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971; Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 11; Madras City Development Control Rules; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 38, 41, 45A, 47, 48A and 51A

Reported in : (2007)1MLJ353

the learned Counsel for thepetitioner relating to Pallikaranai Marsh has to be rejected.16. Section 11 of the Indian Railways Act, 1989, which enables the construction of Railway on any condition is brought to our notice and the said Section … Cooum river to Ramakrishna Mutt Road by spending huge amount. The Government of Tamil Nadu had spent Rs. 132 lakhs for the removal of sludge and silt in the said Canal from Ramakrishna Mutt Road to Adyar