Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Nilkanth Tulsidas Bhatia and 7 ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 113, 114, 115, 119, 122, 141, 150 and 153; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 147, 148, 149, 153A, 164, 302, 307 and 436; Prevention of Terrorists Act, 2002 - Sections 32; Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(4), 5(2), 5(5) and 11; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 100; The Madras Agriculturists Relief Act, 1938; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881; Parent Act - Sections 119; Criminal Law; Constitution of India - Articles 73 and 226; Statutory Investigation into Railway Accidents Rules, 1998 - Rules 2(6) and 4

Reported in : (2006)2GLR952

read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 141, 150 and 153 of the Indian Railways Act, 1989. Later on, the provisions of the Prevention of Terrorists Act, 2002 were also invoked and after filing of … referred to as the 1998 Rules), framed by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 122 of the Railway Act, 1989, the power of the Commissioner of Railway Safety to hold an inquiry into

Torrent Power Aec Ltd. Vs. Gayatri Intermediates Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Electricity Act, 2003 - Sections 1 to 120 and 122 to 185; Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 21(2), 26(6), 39 to 50; Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 - Sections 49; Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998; Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Sections 173; Atomic Energy Act, 1962; Railways Act, 1989; Gujarat Electricity Industry (Reorganization and Regulations) Act, 2003; Electricity (Supply) Rules, 1948; Electricity Rules, 1910; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 47, Rule 1; Electricity Supply Code - Sections 7; Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply code and Related matters) Regulations, 2005 - Regulations 7, 7.1 to 7.4, 7.5, 7.6.1, 7.6.2 to 7.6.4, 7.6.5 to 7.6.8 and 7.7; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1) and 226

Reported in : (2006)2GLR1580

other than this Act.Section 173 refers to the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and Railways Act, 1989.20.3 In view of the provisions of Sections 45, 50 and 62 of the Act, till 7th June … Central Government specified 10th day of June 2003 as the date on which Sections 1 to 120 and Section 122 to 185 of the Electricity Act, 2003 came into force. Clause (d) of Section 172 containing transitional provisions

Narayan Chandra Saha Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Banking

of the Railways Act, 1989 and has submitted that, the saving provision therein postulates that the provisions of Section 122 of the earlier Act being the Railways Act, 1890 would apply to the petitioner inasmuch as the licence … cannot take the law to their own hand and by invoking the provisions of Section 147 of the Railways Act, 1989 to take possession of the licensed property. The Railway Authorities are to take recouRs.of the ordinary law for

Union Of India Vs. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 22 i. Relevant Statutory Scheme and Provisions .............................................. 22 ii. Scope of Section 106 of the Railways Act, 1989 ........................................ 29 a. What is meant by an “Overcharge”?. ....................................................... 35 b. Concept of an ‘Overcharge’ and an … was subsequently changed.10. The respondent vide the aforesaid notice of claim had demanded refund for a total of 122 consignments for which freight had been levied on the basis of a chargeable distance of ‘444 km’. However,

Union of India by Its General Manager Southern Railway, Chennai Vs. Ka ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

deceased and it would not attract the provisions of 'accidental falling from train' under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989 (herein after referred to as the Act). 4. The Tribunal, after analysing the entire evidence on record and

N. and W. Ry. Vs. TraIn Dispatchers

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

adverse effect on competition among rail carriers in the affected region." [ Footnote 2 ] On September 9, 1989, the Commission also filed a petition for rehearing, and requested the court to refrain from ruling on the … bargaining representative for certain N & W employees, Page 499 U. S. 122 that they proposed to consolidate all "power distribution" -- the assignment of … has approved a rail carrier consolidation under the conditions set forth in Chapter 113 of the Interstate Commerce Act (Act), 49 U.S.C. § 11301 et seq., a carrier in such a consolidation "is exempt from the antitrust … such as those governing contracts, the court declined to decide whether the section could operate to override provisions of the Railway Labor Act (RLA) governing

Cheedaraboyina Yesudayamma and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Railway Act, 1899 - Sections 161

Reported in : 2002(2)ALD309

Matched in: Advocate M.V. Ramana Reddy, Adv. G.S. Sanghi, SC for ;Railways

Kedarnath Jagdish Rai and Hemraj Lalji and Co. Vs. the Union of India ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78B; Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 16 and 13(1)

Reported in : III(2004)ACC509; (2003)3MLJ446

of wheat of the value of Rs.1,78,000/-. The appellant caused a notice under Section 78B of the Indian Railways Act, 1890 on 05.05.1993 and thereafter moved the application under Section 16 of The Railway Claims Tribunal Act. The … of the commodity?(ii)Whether the railways are not liable even as bailee under Section 99(1) of the Railways Act, 1989?(iii)Whether the Railways used reasonable foresight and care in the carriage of the goods?(iv)Whether the applicant is entitled to … dated 30.01.1995. The appellant claimed compensation for damages to the consignment of 122 bags of gram booked on 08.10.1990 at Anupgarh to Dindigul and the

State of MaharashtrA. Vs. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - 302, 307, 326, 427, 436, 20A, 120B, 123, 124, 34; ndian Explosives Act; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act; Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 151, 152, 153, 154; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 10, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 40; Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1)(i), 3(2), 3(4); Passports Act, 1967 - Section 12(1)(c); Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 6, 11, 5 to 16, 26, 30, 30(b), 31

the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, read with Sections 151, 152, 153, 154 of the Railways Act, 1989, read with Section 12(1)(c) of the Passports Act, 1967.3. The prosecution case (in Special Case No.21 of 2006) … No.21 of 2006) for offences punishable under Sections 302, 307, 324, 325, 326, 327, 427, 436, 120B, 121-A, 122, 123, 124A, 201, 212 Indian Penal Code, 1860, read with Sections 3(1)(i), 3(2), 3(3), 3(4), 3(5), the MCOCA,

Ajay Maken & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

To summarise the Railways' contentions: (i) Lands ―belonging to the Railways‖ fall exclusively within the purview of the Railways Act, 1989. Reference is made to the definition of ‗Railway‘ contained in Section 2(31) of the Railways Act, 1989. It … relocation/rehabilitation themselves as per the policy of the Delhi Government or may entrust the job to the DUSIB.‖ 122. The proviso to para 2 (a) of the Policy states: ―Provided that, the Agencies while doing relocation rehabilitation/in-situ