Advanced Search Results

Union of India, and ors. Vs. Batuk Mandal, and anr.

Court : Patna

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Section 117; Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Section 6

2005 wherein it has been held that the words 'any civil proceeding' occurring in Section 117 of the Railways Act, 1989 or Section 6 of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 have to be interpreted so as to give

Syed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD689

Matched in: Advocate Mr. P. Radha Krishna, Adv. Mr. D. Srinivas, SC for Railways

Union of India, and ors. Vs. Sri Bidya Nand Choudhary, and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Section 6; Indian Railways Act - Section 117; Constitution of India - Article 133

the Supreme Court and hence, the same should not be held applicable while interpreting Section 117 of the Railways Act, 1989.4. Before considering the aforesaid submission, it is relevant to point out that Section 117 is applicable only in

Union of India, and ors. Vs. Yadunandan Roy, and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Section 6; Indian Railways Act - Section 117; Constitution of India - Article 133

the Supreme Court and hence, the same should not be held applicable while interpreting Section 117 of the Railways Act, 1989.4. Before considering the aforesaid submission, it is relevant to point out that Section 117 is applicable only in

M/s. Goodearth Agro Chem Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. The Container Corpo ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Education

liable to pay penalty and other associated charges. He found that provisions of Sections 66 and 83 of Railways Act, 1989 enable Container Corporation to claim the same from M/s. Goodearth. He accordingly found penal charges payable at Rs.9,07,327.80. … the petitioners jointly and severally liable to pay penalty and other associated charges. He found that provisions of Sections 66 and 83 of Railways Act, 1989 enable Container Corporation to claim the same from M/s. Goodearth. He … Public Interest Litigation vs. Union of India, reported at 2012 (3) SCC 117, where the Hon. Court observes that the expression “prerogative” cannot be used

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act 1957 iv. The Trade Marks Act 1999 63 v. The Railway Claims Tribunal Act 1987 vi. The Railways Act 1989 vii. The Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) PART F Act 1976 viii. The Foreign Exchange … 14 Article 107(1) : Subject to the provisions of articles 109 and 117 with respect to Money Bills and other financial Bills, a Bill may … rejected the challenge based on the separation of powers and proceeded to examine the validity of individual provisions. Section 6 of the Act permitted accountant members or technical members in the respective appellate tribunals to be appointed

Union of India by Its General Manager Southern Railway, Chennai Vs. V. ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

deceased and it would not attract the provisions of 'accidental falling from train' under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989 (herein after referred to as the Act). 4. The Tribunal, after analysing the entire evidence on record and

Agarwala and Co. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 65, 65(2), 69, 72(4), 73 and 79; ;Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2007Cal90

of paragraph 1744 of the Indian Railway Commercial Manual-II read with the provisions of Section 79 of the Railways Act, 1989, it was not permissible for the respondent authority to sit tight over the matter. Mr. Samanta further submits … to the consignor or to the consignee and in their absence without complying with the requirement of Rule 117(4) of the goods tariff cannot be sustained in law. Mr. Samanta further submits that in accordance with the

Shyam Naik and Others Vs. General Manager, East Coast Railway, Rail Vi ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 2012AIR(Ori)38

and 1457 of 2008, disposed of on 10-2-2011, this Court has referred to the various provisions of the Railways Act, 1989 and relied upon the decision of the Apex Court and other High Court, One such decision is, N.K.V. … of Rs. 4 lakhs, which is the minimum liability of the Railway authority to a passenger as per Section 124 of the Railway Act, 1989, urging various facts and legal contentions. 2. The brief facts as stated … in Swarnalata Barua v. Union of India and others, AIR 1963 Assam 117, wherein it has been held that there is an obligation on the

Ajay Maken & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

To summarise the Railways' contentions: (i) Lands ―belonging to the Railways‖ fall exclusively within the purview of the Railways Act, 1989. Reference is made to the definition of ‗Railway‘ contained in Section 2(31) of the Railways Act, 1989. It … of universal application‖ W.P.(C) 11616/2015 Page 73 of 104 DLT944and Joginder Kumar Singh v. Government of NCTDelhi (2005) 117 DLT220(FB). VIII The DUSIB Act 100. A recent statute in the legislative framework concerning the right to housing