Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: railways act 1989 section 109 · Page 1 of about 150 results (0.064 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 25 2004

Pushpaben Jitendrakumar Shah and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jun-25-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 47, 63, 93, 101, 109 and 109(1); Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 47, 47(1), 66(1), 67, 67(1), 67(2), Rules 95, 96, 102, 114, 115, 115(b), 120, 121, 128, 129, 130, 131, 137, 138, 150 and 163

Reported in : II(2005)ACC185; 2005ACJ191; AIR2004Guj370; (2004)3GLR2206

was applicable in the instant case, since the accident occurred prior to the coming into force of the Railways Act, 1989), the railway administration was bound to fix and display the maximum number of passengers that may be carried … is overcrowded, would be guilty of negligence. It was submitted that though, looking to Section 63 read with Section 109 of the said Act, it cannot be denied that the railway was required to prescribe the maximum capacity

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2006

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Kamalendu Shukla Alias Kamrendra Shukla

Court : Patna

Decided on : Apr-03-2006

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987; Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 109; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 82A, 82A(1) and 82A(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47 and 80

of the provision of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 and the provision of Section 109 of the Indian Railways Act, 1989 a suit of such nature was barred and claim could only be considered by Railway Claims Tribunal. It

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 1993

Ratnakar Tanbaji Itankar Vs. Union of India

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-27-1993

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 3, 13, 17(2), 15, 33, 72, 73 and 74; Railways Acts, 1890 - Sections 80 and 82A; Railways Acts, 1989 - Sections 107, 109, 124 and 125; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Railway Claims Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1989

Reported in : 1994ACJ762; AIR1994Bom132; 1994(4)BomCR12

on the spot. The appellant thereafter filed the application before the Claims Tribunal under Section 109 of the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the 'new Railways Act) claiming compensation for the death of his wife Shakuntalabai whe

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 31 2017

Virbhadra Singh & Anr. Vs.central Bureau of Investigation & Or ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-31-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

under Section 13(2) r/w 13(1) (e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter 'the PC Act') and Section 109 IPC by the respondent No.1/CBI, and all actions taken in pursuance of the said Regular Case by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2008

Dr. Anahita Pandole Vs. State of Maharashtra, Urban Development Depart ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : May-05-2008

Subject : CivilEnvironment

Acts : Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Sections 3, 4, 39, 52, 117, 122, 312 to 313A, 314, 328, 328(3) and 328A; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 28, 39, 41, 41(4), 109(3), 110, 110(1), 110(3), 112, 206 and 207; ;Environment Protection Act, 1986; ;Maharashtra Urban Areas Tree Preservation Act, 1975 - Sections 8(4); Bombay Police Act - Sections 33 and 102; ;Finance Act, 1994 - Sections 65(105) and 67; ;Main Roads Act, 1930 - Sections 33B; ;National Highway Act; National Highway (Land and Traffic) Act; Maharashtra Motor Vehicle Rules - Rules 48, 62(2), 72(2), 160, 206, 207 and 208; Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 - Rules 12(1), 92, 105 to 111, 123 to 125A and 126; ;Motor Vehicles (Prescription of Conditions for Exemption) Rules, 1991; Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 198

Reported in : 2008(4)ALLMR72; 2008(3)BomCR516; (2008)110BOMLR1555

affidavit filed on behalf of the Corporation today, Court notice be issued to both the Western and Central Railways through their General Manager, returnable on 28th April, 2008. Liberty to serve panel counsel granted. Learned Counsel for … Rule 92 read with Rule 126 of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 (ii) Chapter VII Rule 160 read with Rule 206, 207 and 208 … of Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 and Section 109(3), 110(1)(k) of the Motor Vehicles Act as also … much less dangerous to the public and should not be disadvantageous to the public health. Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') had been subjected to innumerable amendments over a period of time primarily … Corporation can tax. Indeed, the State Legislature has now done so by Section 4 of Gujarat Act 8 of 1966. The Act does not confer

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2005

Union of India (Uoi), Rep. by the General Manager, South Central Railw ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-13-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 13(1), 16, 17, 17(2), 23 and 24; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1); Railways Amendment Act, 1994 - Sections 13(1); Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 123, 124, 124A, 125 and 128; Railway Claims Procedure Rules, 1989; Railway Accident Compensation Rules, 1990

Reported in : III(2006)ACC652; 2006ACJ1470; AIR2005AP444; 2005(5)ALT541

place on 3-6-1993 and as such the same does not attract the provisions of Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 as contended by the applicant and therefore, the tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the application. Without admitting … in the case of S. Meenakshi Chandra Rao v. General Manager, South Central Railways, Secunderabad, in L.P.A. No. 109 of 1998 dated 9-7-1998 has no application to the contentions of the learned Counsel for the appellant to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 2008

Promuk Hoffman International Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-12-2008

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : RLW2009(1)Raj216

be issued in exercise of the powers under Sub-section (3) of Section 109 of the Central Motor Vehicles Act, 1989; the guidelines dated 6.3.2002 and the mandatory requirement of the tender condition 2.19.2 to substantiate their submission stated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 12 1988

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. M. Thankaraj and Etc. Etc.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-12-1988

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 124A, 126 and 129; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 5, 22, 24 and 24A; Railways Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990 - Rule 3(4); Railways Accidents and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) (Amendment) Rules, 1997; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 34

Reported in : 2000ACJ651; AIR2000Ker91

Claims Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench granting compensation for death or personal injuries of passengers under the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989 read with Rules issued thereunder. Except M.F.A. No. 915/98 all the other appeals are at the Instance of … consider the common question of law and thereafter deal with the factual contentions raised in each case separately.2. Section 124 of the Railways Act, 1989 provides for liability of Railway administration for loss occasioned by the death … v. Sheela Ratnan (1996) 2 Ker LT 695 : (AIR 1997 Ker 109) and United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Alavi (1998) 1 Ker LT

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2019

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-13-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act 1957 iv. The Trade Marks Act 1999 63 v. The Railway Claims Tribunal Act 1987 vi. The Railways Act 1989 vii. The Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) PART F Act 1976 viii. The Foreign Exchange … Money Bill 14 Article 107(1) : Subject to the provisions of articles 109 and 117 with respect to Money Bills and other financial Bills, a … rejected the challenge based on the separation of powers and proceeded to examine the validity of individual provisions. Section 6 of the Act permitted accountant members or technical members in the respective appellate tribunals to be appointed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 2003

R. Sai Bharathi Vs. J. Jayalalitha and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-24-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Indian Stamp Act - Sections 47A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 43, 109, 119, 120B, 169, 175, 176, 177, 179, 181, 191, 202, 221, 222, 223, 225, 405, 409 and 420; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 13(1) and 13(2); Prevention of Undervaluation of Instruments Rules - Rules 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7; Tamil Nadu Stamp Act; Indian Trust Act, 1882 - Sections 52; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 136; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 21, Rule 73; Constitution of India - Articles 73, 136, 154, 162 and 309; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 189; Cattle Trespass Act, 1871 - Sections 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 481

Reported in : 2004CriLJ286; 2003(4)CTC577; JT2003(9)SC343; 2003(10)SCALE68b; (2004)2SCC9

it, it becomes an offence under Section 169 IPC. Section 481 Criminal Procedure Code, Section 189 of the Railways Act, 1989 and Section 19 of the Cattle Trespass Act, 1871 and instances of that nature in several enactments are … with Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, and under Section 169 read with Section 109 IPC. A-6 was charged under Section 120-B IPC, under Section 110 road with 13(2) road with 13(1)(d) of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial