Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: railways act 1989 section 10 · Page 1 of about 3,284 results (0.109 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 14 2013

State of MaharashtrA. Vs. Kamal Ahmed Mohammed Vakil Ansari and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-14-2013

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - 302, 307, 326, 427, 436, 20A, 120B, 123, 124, 34; ndian Explosives Act; Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act; Indian Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 151, 152, 153, 154; Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 10, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 40; Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Sections 3(1)(i), 3(2), 3(4); Passports Act, 1967 - Section 12(1)(c); Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 6, 11, 5 to 16, 26, 30, 30(b), 31

the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, read with Sections 151, 152, 153, 154 of the Railways Act, 1989, read with Section 12(1)(c) of the Passports Act, 1967.3. The prosecution case (in Special Case No.21 of 2006) … 212 Indian Penal Code, 1860, read with Sections 3(1)(i), 3(2), 3(3), 3(4), 3(5), the MCOCA, read with Sections 10, 13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 40 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, read with Sections 6, 9B

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 2012

Union of India Vs. Chairman, U.P.S.E.B. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-09-2012

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 11 (a), (g); Electricity Supply Act, 1948 - Section 43A, 15A, 2(3A), 173, 26A (1); Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ; Electricity Act, 1910 - Section 27D, 9; Electricity Act, 2003 - Section 10 (2)

was very much within the jurisdiction of the Railways, inasmuch as Sections 11 (a) and (g) of the Railways Act, 1989 empower them to carry out such activity and all such necessary works for the purposes of constructing or … Act, 2003, a direct sale of power by a generating company to a consumer is specifically permitted under Section 10 (2) thereof. 16. In the circumstances, the notice dated 7.9.1999 given by the UPSEB was totally uncalled for,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 1999

Smt. Rambha Bai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-02-1999

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 10, 13, 13(1), 13(1A), 15 and 23; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 123, 124 and 124A; Employers' Liability Act, 1880 - Sections 1(5); Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923

Reported in : 2000(1)MPHT573

applicant's husband death was owing to the accident as contemplated under Section 124 and Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 ?' and in this issue the Tribunal considered the position regarding its jurisdiction analysing the provision of Section … not to be treated as excluded. Apart from this the Workmen's Compensation Act is a special Act and Section 10 deals with the claims. Learned counsel submitted that he may be permitted to avail the remedy under the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 26 2004

Sivadasan Vs. State

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Nov-26-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Railway Protection Force Act, 1957 - Sections 10 and 20(3); Indian Railways Act, 1890; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 2(34); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 197 and 239; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 392

Reported in : 2005(2)KLT225

that the revision petitioners were not on duty on the day of the incident. Section 2(34) of the Railways Act, 1989 defines 'railway servant' as any person employed by the Central Government or by a railway administration in connection … 1500/-. Admittedly, the petitioners were on duty at the relevant time. They are railway servants as defined under Section 10 of the Act which reads as follows:'Officers and members of the force to be deemed to be railway

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2005

Smt. M. Chandravathi and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-17-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 124, 124A and 125; ;Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 82A, 82A(2) and 82C; ;Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13, 13(1), 13(1A), 13I, 16, 17(2), 24, 123, 124 and 124A; Limitation Act - Sections 5; ;Railway (Amendment) Act, 1994 - Sections 124(A); Indian Railways Rules; ;Punjab Pre-emption Act, 1913; Haryana Pre-emption (Amendment) Act, 1995 - Sections 15; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Sections 3(1); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 17B; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140 and 217; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1998; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 92A

Reported in : III(2005)ACC322; 2005ACJ1465; ILR2005KAR3671

Claims Tribunal rejecting the claim made by them seeking compensation under the provisions of Section 125 of the Railways Act, 1989, read with Section 123(c), 124 and 124(A) and Section 17(2) of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.2. Relevant … Union Of India, : [1998]1SCR899 .vi) Rathi Menon v. Union Of India, AIR 2000 SC 1333.vii) MFA NO. 1001/991 Disposed Off On 18.8.1995 (Kerala High Court)13. As against this, learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Railway Administration, Mr.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 2012

Union of India by Its General Manager Southern Railway, Chennai Vs. th ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-28-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

deceased and it would not attract the provisions of 'accidental falling from train' under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989 (herein after referred to as the Act). 4. The Tribunal, after analysing the entire evidence on record and … before the Tribunal claiming compensation for the death of their son. It was pleaded that on 1.11.1994 at 10.30 a.m. the deceased was travelling in suburban electric train from Mambalam Railway Station in order to proceed to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 07 2002

Godisela Rajamma and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-07-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 123 and 123(2); Railways (Amendment) Act, 1994; Railways Act, 1890

Reported in : 2003ACJ1404; 2002(4)ALD632; 2002(4)ALT370

Matched in: Advocate S. Chandra Sekhar, Adv. D. Srinivas, SC for Railways

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 13 2001

Rathi Menon Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-13-2001

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 19, 123, 124A, 126 and 129; Railway (Amendment) Act, 1994; Railway Accident Compensation Rules 1990 - Rule 3 (1); Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 4

Reported in : I(2001)ACC453; 2001ACJ721; AIR2001SC1333; JT2001(3)SC457; 2001(2)KLT12(SC); (2001)3MLJ1(SC); 2001(2)SCALE432; (2001)3SCC714; [2001]2SCR365; 2001(2)LC1053(SC)

her by the Claims Tribunal. 13. Appellant's claim for the compensation was based on Section 124A of the Railways Act 1989 (for short 'the Act'). The said Section itself was introduced as per Railway (Amendment) Act 28 of 1994. … Bench expressed the helplessness of law in helping the hapless female in her misery of the superlative dimension. 10. Though her body was disabled due to the paraplegia afflicted consequent to the rupture of the spinal cord,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 18 2017

M/S Global Carrying India vs.union of India & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-18-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

non-compliance of giving the requisite notice within six months of overcharging as required by Section 106(3) of the Railways Act, 1989. Putting it in other words if for arising of a valid claim in law against the Railways, and … also like to note that a provision similar to Section 106(3) of the Railways Act is found in Section 10 of the Carriers Act, 1865 and which specifies that a case for a claim under the Carriers Act

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2026

Basant Kumar Singh & Anr. vs Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-20-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

was a bona fide passenger or that the incident constituted an “untoward incident” under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989 (hereinafter as the “Act”).5. Learned counsel for the appellants contended that the deceased was abona fide passenger, travelling … present appeal has been preferred under Section 23 of the RailwayClaims Tribunal Act, 1987 against the judgment dated 10.06.2025 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi (hereinafter the “Tribunal”) in OA/II(U)/DLI/149/2024, whereby the claim application

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial