Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: railways act 1989 chapter 7 · Page 1 of about 640 results (0.094 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 20 2015

M/s. Kumaraswamy Mineral Exports and Another Vs. The Commercial Manage ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on : Aug-20-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

rate which is unreasonable, it would be for the complainant to approach the Railway Rates Tribunal constituted under Chapter VII of the Railways Act, 1989. Therefore, since the petitioners were armed with an alternative remedy of redressal, … the present writ petition is misconceived and is not maintainable. That in terms of Section 36 of the Railways Act, 1989, any complaint as regards the Railway administration charging for the carriage of any commodity between two stations, at … as per the Railway receipts bearing No.212000758. 212000768, 212000769 dispatched on 30.1.2008, 7.2.2008 and 8.2.2008 respectively to the consignee petitioner No.1., and etc.) 1. Heard

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2022

James Alex, vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-29-2022

purpose of Railway, is with the 1st respondent. The 1st respondent has to issue a notification contemplated in Chapter IV-A of :9: the Railways Act, 1989. The 1st respondent has not issued any such notification. Ext.P4 amounts … petitioners would contend that in the 4thSchedule to the LARR Act, 2013, the 13 th entry is the Railways Act, 1989. Therefore, the LARR Act, 2013 cannot be applied for acquisition of lands for Railway. Acquisition of land for … P.O., KURAVILANGAD, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 633. 5 HAYASINTH SEBASTIAN AGED 70 YEARS W/O.K.J.ANTONY, KUTTICKAL HOUSE, KALATHOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 633.BY

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 2022

M.V.Chackochan vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Mar-29-2022

purpose of Railway, is with the 1st respondent. The 1st respondent has to issue a notification contemplated in Chapter IV-A of :9: the Railways Act, 1989. The 1st respondent has not issued any such notification. Ext.P4 amounts … petitioners would contend that in the 4thSchedule to the LARR Act, 2013, the 13 th entry is the Railways Act, 1989. Therefore, the LARR Act, 2013 cannot be applied for acquisition of lands for Railway. Acquisition of land for … P.O., KURAVILANGAD, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 633. 5 HAYASINTH SEBASTIAN AGED 70 YEARS W/O.K.J.ANTONY, KUTTICKAL HOUSE, KALATHOOR P.O., KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 686 633.BY

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 21 2021

Mayadevi vs the General Manager

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-21-2021

deceased while he was crossing the railway track and the accident will not come within the purview of Chapter XIII of the Railways Act, 1989 and the Railway Accident and Untoward Incidents WP(C) 21612-2015 ..4.. (Compensation) Rules, … the railway administration and therefore the respondents are liable to pay compensation as per the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989 and the Railway Accident and Untoward Incidents (Compensation) Rules, 1990. It is further contended that, since the deceased … stated that the accident occurred on 20.07.2012 and in view of Article 72 of Part VII of the 1 st Division of Schedule I of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2005

Udaipur Cement Works Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-23-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13, 13(1), 29(2) and 41(1); Railways act, 1989 - Sections 94

Reported in : AIR2005Raj267; RLW2005(2)Raj1170; 2005(3)WLC125

Tribunal shall have jurisdiction in matters relating to responsibilities of railway administration as Careers under Chapter-VII of the Railways act, 1989 (for short 'the Act of 1989') in respect of the claims for compensation as enumerated in Sub-clause (i)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2004

Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by General Manager South Eastern Railway Vs. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-21-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78B and 82A; Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13, 13(1), 17 and 17(1)

Reported in : II(2005)ACC520; AIR2005AP184; 2005(2)ALD525; 2005(2)ALT127

shall also exercise, on and from the date of commencement of the provisions of Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989), all such jurisdiction, powers and authority as were exercisable immediately before that date by any … under the provisions of the Railways Act,-(a) relating to the responsibility of the railway administrations as carriers under Chapter VII of the Railways Act in respect of claims for-(i) compensation for loss, destruction, damage, deterioration or non-delivery … collected more freight than prescribed. Therefore, Visakhapatnam Steel issued notices under Section 78B of Indian Railways Act, 1890 (hereinafter called '1890 Act') on 20-1-1988, 24-3-1988,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 2013

Union of India Through Its General Manager North Eastern Railway Gorak ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on : Jul-22-2013

Subject : MRTP

to discharge. 6. Learned counsel has also relied on the provisions of sections 97 and 100 of the Railways Act, 1989 under which the railways cannot be held liable for compensation in this case and the State Commission erred … under the provisions of Railway Act,- (a) relating to the responsibility of the railway administrations as carriers under Chapter VII of the Railways Act in respect of claims for- (i) compensation for loss, destruction, damages, deterioration or … about 2O clock in the night. When the complainant woke up at 7O clock in the morning, she found that her grey colour suitcase which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 2013

Union of India Through Its General Manager North Eastern Railway Gorak ...

Court : National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC

Decided on : Jul-22-2013

Subject : MRTP

to discharge. 6. Learned counsel has also relied on the provisions of sections 97 and 100 of the Railways Act, 1989 under which the railways cannot be held liable for compensation in this case and the State Commission erred … under the provisions of Railway Act,- (a) relating to the responsibility of the railway administrations as carriers under Chapter VII of the Railways Act in respect of claims for- (i) compensation for loss, destruction, damages, deterioration or … about 2O clock in the night. When the complainant woke up at 7O clock in the morning, she found that her grey colour suitcase which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 18 2012

Shree Shyam Agency. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-18-2012

Subject : Railways

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 16, 82A; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 124A, 61, 62, 87(2); Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123,124; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 22; Railways (Manner of Delivery of Consignments AND Sale Proceeds in the Absence of Railway Receipt), Rules, 1990

Reported in : (2013)1SCC283

shall also exercise, on AND from the date of commencement of the provisions of section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989), all such jurisdiction, powers AND authority as were exercisable immediately before that date by any … stated therein, shall lie on the consignor, the consignee or the endorsee."Section 74 of the Railways Act, 1989 deals with the passing of property in … to be carried by railway AND not for adjudication of any claim or dispute against a third party.11. Chapter III of the Tribunal Act deals with the jurisdiction, powers AND authority of the Claims Tribunal. Section 13

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2024

Union Of India Vs. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 22 i. Relevant Statutory Scheme and Provisions .............................................. 22 ii. Scope of Section 106 of the Railways Act, 1989 ........................................ 29 a. What is meant by an “Overcharge”?. ....................................................... 35 b. Concept of an ‘Overcharge’ and an … the repealing provision contained in Section 200 of the Act, 1989. The Act, 1989 is divided into 16 Chapters and 200 Sections. Chapter XI of the Act, 1989 sets out the provisions (Section(s) 93 to112) relating to … Whether the present case is one of ‘Overcharge’ or ‘Illegal Charge’?. .... 76 a. Applicability of Section 106(3) of the Railways Act, 1989. .................. 76

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial