Advanced Search Results

The Union of India Owning Southern Railway. Vs. the Addl. Registrar, R ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Section 123 (c)(2), 124-A, 2(29), 129; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 174; Railway Rules 1990 - Rule 4, 124

accidental death, which is an 'untoward incident' as per Section 123 (c) (2) and Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989, respondents 2 and 3 as his dependents are entitled to the maximum compensation of Rs.4,00,000/-.7. According to Mr.T.S.Rajamohan, … the running of trains, Railway Administration, claiming of compensation for death or other causalities in a train accident. Chapter XIII of the Act deals with the railway "accident" and 'untoward incident' and liability of Railway Administration for … the conclusion that on 24.08.2007, at the Veeravakiyam Railway Station, at about 6.45 p.m., the Chennai-Managlore Express train made an unscheduled halt and the train

Union Of India Vs. M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

ANALYSIS .............................................................................................. 22 i. Relevant Statutory Scheme and Provisions .............................................. 22 ii. Scope of Section 106 of the Railways Act, 1989 ........................................ 29 a. What is meant by an “Overcharge”?. ....................................................... 35 b. Concept of an ‘Overcharge’ and an … the repealing provision contained in Section 200 of the Act, 1989. The Act, 1989 is divided into 16 Chapters and 200 Sections. Chapter XI of the Act, 1989 sets out the provisions (Section(s) 93 to112) relating to … Table/2004/20 Chief Commercial Manager (M&R) Civil Appeal No(s). 1891-1966 of 2024 Page 6 of 95 North Central Rail Allahabad SUB: Charging of FO HPS Book

Union of India versus M/S Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2024] 3 S.C.R. 1051

The following questions arise for consideration: (i) What is the scope of Section 106 sub-section (3) of the Railways Act, 1989; In other words, what constitutes an “overcharge” within the meaning of Section 106 sub-section (3) of the Railways … the repealing provision contained in Section 200 of the Act, 1989. The Act, 1989 is divided into 16 Chapters and 200 Sections. Chapter XI of the Act, 1989 sets out the provisions (Section(s) 93 to 112) relating … railway by sending a notice of claim - A statutory time-period of 6-months has been provided for making a notice of claim u/s. 106 of

Smt. Nazara and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1997(2)WLC550; 1997(1)WLN426

shall also exercise, on and from the date of commencement of the provisions of Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 (24 of 1989), all such jurisdiction, powers and authority as were exercisable immediately before that date by any … under the provisions of the Railways Act,(a) relating to the responsibility of the railway administrations as carriers under Chapter VII, of the Railways Act In respect of claims(i) compensation for loss, destruction, damage, deterioration or non-delivery of

Bhagaban Dey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 30, 33, 36, 37, 43, 48, 70, 72(2), 72(3), 72(4), 73, 78, 79, 82 and 83

Reported in : AIR2010Cal13

Mr. Das, Counsel for the respondents, in view of the provisions of Sections 33 and 36 of the Railways Act, 1989, against the demands the petitioner's remedy, if any, is only before the Tribunal. He has relied on Jagit … Tribunal, and the Tribunal shall hear and decide any such complaint in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter.6. Mr. De has argued that questioning the punitive and the wharfage charges the petitioner could not file a

State of Kerala Represented by Its Chief Secretary vs Binu Sebastian

Court : Kerala

of India and Railway Board or their instrumentalities issue appropriate notification, as contemplated under the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989, for the ends of justice.6. The issues raised in the writ petitions are in relation toinstallation of survey … be done after undergoing the procedures contemplated under Sections 11 and 12 of the LARR, 2013, coming under Chapter IV dealing with notification and acquisition. That apart, learned counsel for the writ petitioners raised contentions supporting the

State of Kerala vs V.V Varma

Court : Kerala

of India and Railway Board or their instrumentalities issue appropriate notification, as contemplated under the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989, for the ends of justice.6. The issues raised in the writ petitions are in relation toinstallation of survey … be done after undergoing the procedures contemplated under Sections 11 and 12 of the LARR, 2013, coming under Chapter IV dealing with notification and acquisition. That apart, learned counsel for the writ petitioners raised contentions supporting the

State of Kerala Represented by the Additional Chief Secretary to Gover ...

Court : Kerala

of India and Railway Board or their instrumentalities issue appropriate notification, as contemplated under the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989, for the ends of justice.6. The issues raised in the writ petitions are in relation toinstallation of survey … be done after undergoing the procedures contemplated under Sections 11 and 12 of the LARR, 2013, coming under Chapter IV dealing with notification and acquisition. That apart, learned counsel for the writ petitioners raised contentions supporting the

State of Kerala Represented by Secretary to Government vs Sunil J Arac ...

Court : Kerala

of India and Railway Board or their instrumentalities issue appropriate notification, as contemplated under the provisions of the Railways Act, 1989, for the ends of justice.6. The issues raised in the writ petitions are in relation toinstallation of survey … be done after undergoing the procedures contemplated under Sections 11 and 12 of the LARR, 2013, coming under Chapter IV dealing with notification and acquisition. That apart, learned counsel for the writ petitioners raised contentions supporting the

The Chief Manager Vs A Ranganayaki

Court : Chennai

of Railway Claims Tribunal Act is to be examined. An 'untoward incident' defined under Section 123(c) of The Railways Act, 1989, reads as under:123. Definitions.- In this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires,-(a) .....(b) ...... (i)..... (ii)..... (iii).... (iv)....(c) … MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ and C.M.P. No.15001 of 2025 1.The Chief Manager, Southern Railway, Park Town, Chennai - 600 003. 2.The Chief Security Officer, Railway Protection Force, Southern Railways, Park Town, Chennai - 600 003. ... AppellantsVs.