Advanced Search Results
Union of India Vs. M/S. K.D. Krishan Lal
Delhi
Jul-02-1999
Limitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 ; Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 77(2)
2001ACJ1748; 1999IVAD(Delhi)740; AIR1999Delhi349; 80(1999)DLT412; 1999(50)DRJ446; ILR1999Delhi38
the appellant is that through the appellant/defendant was entitled to the protection under Section 77(2) of the Indian Railways Act,1890 the Tribunal wrongly held that the said provisions were not attracted to the present case. Having considered the … a railway administration after termination of transit- (1) A railway administration shall be responsible as a bailee under Sections 151, 152 and 161 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872,for the loss, destruction, damage, deterioration or no delivery
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) Represented by the General Manager, Southern Rly. ...
Kerala
Feb-05-1960
CivilLimitation
Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 - Sections 25; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 115; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 77; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 31
AIR1960Ker306
is that the suit is bad for the lack of a notice under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act, 1890, within the time stipulated therein. Section 77 reads as follows:''A person shall not be entitled to a refund … any railway receipt being produced, and even the elementary precaution of obtaining an indemnity bond was not taken.4. Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, provides:'The High Court, for the purpose of satisfying itself
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKondapalli Virraju Vs. General Manager Representing the Union of India ...
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-11-1959
Civil
Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 77, 80 and 140; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 80
AIR1959AP594
Civil Revision pension raises a question relating to the interpretation of Sections 77 and 80 of the Indian Railways Act. 1890. It arises out of a suit instituted (or recovery of a sum of Rs. 1,415/-by way of damages
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ram Padarath Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Allahabad
May-06-1974
Civil
Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 77 and 140
AIR1974All465
dismissed the plaintiff's suit was that he had not complied with the provisions of Section 77 of the Railways Act, 1890. 2. On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant it is alleged that the plaintiff had duly complied with the requirements … without any force. It is dismissed with costs to the contesting respondents. Civil - serving of notice - Sections 77 and 140 of Railways Act, 1890 - suit for recovery of compensation for non-delivery of consignment - application
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMutsaddi Lal Vs. Government-general in Council Through the General Man ...
Allahabad
Jul-25-1952
Civil
Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 77; Limitation Act, 1908 - Article 31
AIR1952All897
49 ALL. 236, it was held that non-delivery includes 'loss' as that term is used in Section 77, Railways Act, 1890, and notice of the suit under that section was necessary. On the other hand, in Secy. of State … grounds of appeal two main questions of law have been raised. One question is that no notice under Section 77, Railways Act was required because this was a case of non-delivery and not a case of loss,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendra Textiles, Jodhpur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Rajasthan
Dec-13-2001
Civil
Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 77(2); Railways (Amendment) Act, 1989 - Sections 99
2003ACJ1163; AIR2002Raj226; 2002(4)WLC748; 2002(4)WLN41
the appellant is not entitled to get compensation because of the provisions of Section 77(2) of the Indian Railways Act, 1890 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').6. While deciding Issue No. 5, which relates to entitlement of the interest … a railway administration after termination of transit.-- (1) A railway administration shall be responsible as a bailee under Sections 151, 152 and 161 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (9 of 1872), for the toss, destruction, damage,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India Owning and Administering Central Railway Per General Ma ...
Mumbai
Feb-26-1968
Civil
Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 3(6), 72, 74E, 77, 80, 140, 142, 144 and 148; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 2, 69, 151, 152 and 161; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 106, 114 and 115; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 79 and 80 - Order 41, Rules 1 and 2; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 92; Indian Post Office Act, 1866
AIR1969Bom401; (1969)71BOMLR214; ILR1969Bom864; 1968MhLJ797
manager of railways which haw handled goods--Whether notice sufficient compliance with Section 77.;Under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act, 1890, the service of notice of claim upon the manager of any of the railways which have handled the … the Union of India must fail and is dismissed with costs.56. Appeal dismissed. Indian Railways Act (IX of 1890), Sections 77, 80, 140, 3(6) & (4), 142 - Civil Procedure Code (Act V of 1908), Sections 79, 80--Service of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP.R. Narayanaswami Iyer and ors. Vs. Union of India
Chennai
Apr-16-1959
Civil
Indian Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 3(6), 77 and 80
AIR1960Mad58
the Chief Judge, Court of Small Causes is restored with costs.(26). Appeals allowed. Indian Railways Act (IX of 1890), Sections 77 and 80--Civil Procedure Code (Act V of 1908)--Sections 79 and 80--Suit against Union of India represented by General
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJetmull Bhojraj Vs. the Darjeeling Himalayan Railway Co. Ltd. and ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-02-1962
Commercial
Limitation Act - Schedule - Articles 15(2) and 30; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 77
AIR1962SC1879; (1963)IMLJ89(SC); [1963]2SCR832
6. The other reason why the appeal should fail is that no notice under s. 77 of the Railways Act 1890, had been given. That section so far as material is in these terms. 7. S. 77. A person … should fail is that no notice under s. 77 of the Railways Act 1890, had been given. That section so far as material is in these terms. 7. S. 77. A person shall not be entitled............to compensation
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskOudh and Tirhut Railway Vs. Mrs. Karam Chand Paras Ram
Allahabad
Aug-14-1957
Civil
Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 72 and 77; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Articles 30 and 31
AIR1958All234
Judge the Division Bench dismissed the appeal with costs.) (i) Civil - compensation claimed - Section 77 of Railways Act, 1890 - suit for compensation for loss due to non-delivery - notice not necessary - purpose of notice to … detention, conversion, etc. The word 'loss' is used not only in the risk note H but also in Sections 72 to 78, 80, 82, etc. along with the words 'destruction' and 'deterioration'. 'Loss or damage' are also
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »