Advanced Search Results
Union of India Vs. Shri Harananda
Supreme Court of India
Feb-05-2019
Land Acquisition
the original Writ Petitioners that all the writ petitioners are the Officers holding Group “A” posts in the Railway Protection Force (hereinafter referred as to the ‘RPF’) and all of them were recruited through the Civil Services Examination conducted … respect to filling up the posts on deputation. Reliance has been placed upon Section 19 of the Railways Protection Force (Amendment) Act, 1985. It is submitted that the aforesaid provisions clearly prohibit any deputation to the Group ’A’ post. It … of OGACs, Shri Lekhi, learned ASG has relied upon Section 8 of the RPF Act, 1957. Relying upon Section 3 and Section 8 of the RPF Act, it is submitted that once the RPF is an Armed Force … by the High Court considering the fact that as far back in 2003, vide O.M. dated 20.11.2003, ‘in principle’ decision was taken by the DoPT
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskArokya Das @ Das Chinna Cowry Chinna @ Chinna Savari vs State of Karna ...
Karnataka
Sep-02-2024
IN C.C.NO.89/2019 ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.1269/2017 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 147, 145(b), 174a OF RAILWAYS ACT, 1989 OF POSTCOMMANDER/RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE (INSPECTOR) RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE (RPF) BANGARPET, BANGALORE DIVISION, SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY, BANGARPET, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 122, NOW … not decided.” The offence alleged in the case before the Apex Court was under the Railway Property Act. Section 3 of the Railway Property Act reads as follows:“3. Penalty for theft, dishonest misappropriation or unlawful possession of railway … (2) of Section 179. Section 26A is brought in by way of amendment with effect from 01-07-2004. The learned counsel representing the Railways has produced … of said train. Thereby, they have committed an offence punishable u/s 147, 145(b) and 174(a) of Railways Amended Act, 2003. Hence, it is prayed before the Hon’ble JMFC Court, Bangarpet that, this complaint may be taken on court
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBINULALSINGH Vs Union of India Rep. by
Chennai
Jun-12-2026
Stalin6. Y.Samuel7. Vijayakumar8. Jakgrit Dhabanesan9. Jebba ..Petitioner(s)Vs Union of India Rep. By Mr.P.S.Iji, The Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police, Railway Protection Force, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari, Crime No.482 of 2023 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, … them in Crime No.482 of 2023, for the offences punishable under Section 174(a), 147 and 145(b) of Railway Act, 1989 (Amended in 2003).Page2 of 83.On a perusal of records and also on the submissions made by the … who is serving as a sitting MLA, Nagercoil (Congress Party), along with 30 other members of Kanyakumari district, West Committee, conducted a protest as against
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
K. Surendran vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Oct-03-2023
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2 THE ASSISTANT SUB INSPECTOR RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, KOZHILKODE, PIN - 673 001. BY ADV SRI.DINESH CHERUKAT, SC, RAILWAYS OTHER PRESENT: SREEJA. V PP … the petitioner and others alleging offences punishable under Sections 147, 145(b), 146 and 174 of the Railways (Second Amendment) Act, 2003.3. The prosecution case is that on 26.02.2013 atabout 16.00 hours, accused persons barged into the railway station … the 3rd day of October, 2023ORDERThis Criminal Miscellaneous Case is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (“the Code” for the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMuslim Ansari vs the Union of India
Kerala
Mar-04-2020
ADVS. SRI.NOBEL RAJU SRI.C.R.JAYAKUMAR SMT.P.K.VINAYA SRI.P.Y.AHAMMED PHYSI RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS: 1 THE UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY THE STANDING COUNSEL, RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, 682 031 2 THE ASST. SUB INSPECTOR, RPF, CHENGANNUR, ALAPPUZHA 689 121. R1 BY … First Class Magistrate's Court-I, Chengannur for having allegedly committed offences punishable under Section 143(1)(a) of the Railways (Second Amendment) Act, 2003. The petitioner was in judicial custody for 44 days. He had therefore filed an application for early hearing
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.Abraham Mathen vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Aug-02-2023
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT: 1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. 2 J.AJITHKUMAR SUB INSPECTOR RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, KOTTAYAM. BY ADV SRI.DINESH CHERUKAT, SC, RAILWAYS S MANU, SC RAILWAYS THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP … the remaining accused are punishable under Sections 142(b) and 143(1)(a) and (b) and 143(2) of the Railways (Second Amendment) Act, 2003 (for short, 'the Railways Act').3. The revision petitioner was working as a Reservation-cum-Enquiry Clerk at Kottayam Railway Station. … The offence alleged against him and the remaining accused are punishable under Sections 142(b) and 143(1)(a) and (b) and 143(2) of the Railways (Second Amendment)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTejen Mitra and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Kolkata
Feb-01-2008
Civil
Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 - Section 47(1); ;Constitution of India - Article 309; ;Medical Examination Rules - Rules 304 and 514; ;Indian Railway Establishment Code
2008(2)CHN718
of 45 years, and thereafter at the termination of every period of 5 years.Note : The employees in Railway Protection Force will be re-examined for physical fitness at the termination of every period of three years, calculated from the … (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995-Absorption of disabled/ medically decategorised staff in alternative employment- Amendment to CODE.In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to Article 309 of the Constitution, the President … constable (appellant No. 3) was issued sometime in the month of August, 2003 by the Under Secretary informing the General Manager that he had been … and service benefits, efforts to locate suitable alternative employment starting immediately.(Authority : Section 47(1) of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri. Mohammed Haris Nalapad vs State by Sgwf
Karnataka
Feb-09-2026
RAILWAYS ACT, 1989, ARISING OUT OF THE CHARGE SHEET FILED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 SGWF POST POLICE STATION RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE IN CRIME NO. 776/2022 SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS … facie materials to proceed against the accused for the offences P/U/S 145(c) 147, 154 and 174(a) Railways Act-1989 Amended 2003. Hence, cognizance is taken U/s 190 of Cr.P.C for the offences P/U/S 145(c) 147, 154 and 174(a) … UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 528 OF BNSS, 2023, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.32925/2022 … OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 32 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI MOHAMMED HARIS NALAPAD, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskV.K. Vashisht Vs. New India Assurance Company Limited
Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
Mar-09-2004
Land Acquisition
filed by Sh. V.K. Vashisht describing himself to be the sole proprietor of M/s. Chandigarh Sales Company, opposite Railway Goods Shed, Railway Road, Chandigarh U.T. This complaint was filed on 17.10.2003. The complaint came for preliminary hearing … borne by the parties themselves. Copies of this order be sent to the parties free of charge. Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 2(1)(d) - Cases Referred: 1. II (1995) CPJ 1 (SC). (Relied) [Para 14] 2. … Act as amended by Act No. 62 of 2002, which came into force w.e.f. 15.3.2003. Section 2(1)(d)(ii) of the C.P. Act as amended, provides as … the C.P. Act as the commercial purpose has been excluded after the amendment of the C.P. Act from both the clauses of Section 2(1)(d) i.e.,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaishri Laxmanrao Patil Vs. The Chief Minister And Ors.
Supreme Court of India
May-05-2021
Land Acquisition
appellant is that after 102nd Amendment to the Constitution which came into force with effect from 15.08.2018, the Maharashtra Legislature had no competence to enact … for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes under the Constitution or other laws.2. Vide the Constitution (Eighty-ninth Amendment) Act, 2003, a separate National Commission for 292 Scheduled Tribes was created by inserting a new article 338A in the … counsel for the petitioners have given reference to several cases in this regard, namely, Catering Cleaners of Southern Railway v. Union of India [Catering Cleaners of Southern Railway v. Union of India, (1987) 1 SCC700:1987. SCC (L&S) … for the effective implementation of those safeguards and other measures for the protection, welfare and socio-economic development of the socially and educationally backward classes; and … above the provisions of the 2018 Act. In Section 2(j), the Maratha Community has been declared and … claim to be backward, comes to 48.6% plus 35.7% equivalent to 84.3% of the total population. There
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »