Advanced Search Results

Thakar Dass Kakkar Vs. General Manager Northern Railway, Etc.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Establishment Code - Rule 2017

Reported in : 1985(8)DRJ48

posts of the Construction Division of the Northern Railway. (5) On second question, my attention is invited to Rule 2017 of the Indian Railway Establishment Code, Volume II. The service rendered by the petitioner on the ex-cadre post … in the said project as ex-cadre posts. Reference is also made to para 2003 (3) of the Indian Railway Establishment Code, Volume Ii which defines cadre meaning the strength of a service or a part of a service sanctioned

Harmohinder Singh and anr. Vs. General Manager, Northern Railway and o ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Railway Establishment Code - Rule 2017

Reported in : AIR1967Delhi56

their salaries. The parties will bear their own costs.(7) Petitions allowed Service - increment - Rule 2017 of Railway Establishment Code - petitioners railway employees - initial salary fixed at higher value by respondents - subsequently respondent deducted over

Divisional Personnel Officer, Western Railway, Ajmer Vs. Brijkishore K ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Wages Act, 1936 - Sections 15

Reported in : AIR1964Raj66

document No. 4(F) read with the previous letter, document No. 4(B) read with Rule 2017 of Indian Railways Establishment Code, Volume II. The Authority under the Payment of Wages Act by its order dated the 30th of June, … This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the Divisional Personnel Officer, Western Railway, Ajmer challenging the order of the Authority under the Payment of Wages Act (No. IV of 1936) at

Madhu & Anr. Vs.northern Railway & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

is arbitrary, discriminatory, and hence unconstitutional.5. The Appellants also allege a violation of Section 602(2) of the Indian Railway Establishment Code Volume, which states, “Medical attendance and treatment facilities shall be available, free of charge, to all „Railway employees‟ … former employee of Indian Railways, the third respondent. The Indian Railways Medical Manual and the Railway Servant Pass Rules allows for the issue of a REHLS card and establishes the “wife” and “unmarried daughter” as “family” for

Prabhat Ranjan Singh Vs. r.k. Kushwaha

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

on to hold that the power of the Railways to frame rules under Rule 201 of the Indian Railway Establishment Code (for short ‘IREC’), which is statutory in nature, is only confined to Group­C and Group­D posts. Therefore, the … (C) No.52 OF2018JUDGMENT Deepak Gupta J.1. Leave granted in appeal arising out of SLP (C) No(s). 22444 of 2017.2. This is yet another battle, in the seemingly never ending war between promotees and direct recruits. 2 3.

Union of India vs Vijayan R.

Court : Kerala

ALLOWANCES TO THE RUNNINGSTAFF ON RAILWAYS, 1981.EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF PARA 1507 AND 1509 OF THE INDIAN RAILWAY ESTABLISHMENT CODE, VOL.II. EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE RULE 49 OF THE RAILWAY SERVICES (PENSION) RULES, 1993. EXHIBIT P7 … ..5.. EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM BENCH DATED 16TH JANUARY 2017 IN OA NO. EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF RULES 3(III), 3(IV), 3(V) &E(VI) OF THE RULES OF THE

G.Karunakaran vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

TRUE EXTRACT OF RULE 66 OF THE RAILWAY SERVICES(PENSION) RULES 1993 AND ALSO RULE 1802(B) OF THE INDIAN RAILWAY ESTABLISHMENT CODE VOL.II.EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEARING NO.V/P.579/III/TE/VOL.V DATED11.04.2018. Annexure A2 TRUE COPY … S. nak APPENDIX OF OP (CAT) 80/2018 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 21 SEP 2017 IN OA NO.180/00666/2016 RENDERED BY THE LEARNED CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM BENCH. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF OA

Union of India, vs G. Bhaskara Jyothi,

Court : Kerala

received the entire retirement benefits and thereafter, with much delay filed a statutory appeal and revision. The Indian Railway Establishment Code Vo.II produced as Annexure A12, does not say anything about pensionary benefits. Initially, in the revisional order, there … BY THE APPLICANT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN O.A Annexure A10 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT EXTRACT OF RULE 1343(FR54 OF THE INDIAN RAILWAY ESTABLISHMENT CODE VOLUME 2 Annexure A11 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.V/VO/CON./27 DATED … was given all the due retirementbenefits by issuing Pension Payment Order No. 20177060400069 and he was paid an amount of Rs.34,41,591/- towards retirement benefits andpension.

General Manager and Ors. Vs.prem Pal Singh & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

On the said promotions, the pay had been fixed under Fundamental Rule 22 C (Rule 1313 of Indian Railway Establishment Code Volume-II). The respondents had also been granted the benefit of financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme in the … * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2581/2014 Reserved on:13. h January, 2017 Date of decision:2. d February, 2017 GENERAL MANAGER AND ORS. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.J.K. Singh, Advocate versus PREM

Sushil Kumar Khanna vs.bses Yamuna Power Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

1980-1988. They felt aggrieved by the Notification dated December 05, 1988 whereby Rule 2544 of the Indian Railways Establishment Code was amended and for the purpose of calculation of average emoluments, the maximum limit in respect of running … the ground that the OA was barred by limitation. The appellants were employed as guards in the Northern Railway and they retired between the year 1980-1988. They felt aggrieved by the Notification dated December 05, 1988 whereby … HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: August 03, 2017 Judgment delivered on: August 31, 2017 SUSHIL KUMAR KHANNA ........ Petitioner Through: