Advanced Search Results

Bans NaraIn Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 10, 59(1) and 59(28); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 16

Reported in : AIR1977All6

but without any order as to costs. Service - prison rules - Sections 10 and 59 (28) of Prisons Act, 1894 and Rule 1135 of Chapter XII of Jail Manual U.P. - Rule provides power to Government to make … under the Cantonments Act discharging any such duties. The duties of the Cantonment Board are laid down in Section 62 and amongst others, clause (xiv) lays down the duties of establishing and maintaining or assisting primary schools only.

Meharraj Vs. 1)The State of Tamil Nadu,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Miscellaneous

interview facility was stopped for a period of three months as prison punishment, under Section 46 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (Central Act IX of 1594). He also submitted that only a minor punishment was awarded for his serious … Law by H.W.R. Wade (Administrative Law by H.W.R. Wade, Sixth Edition) and the relevant passages occur at pages 620 and 621 as reflected below: ?.Habeas corpus cannot be used as a means of appeal but only of

Asha Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

General of Prisons under Section 29 extracted above.” 28. Thereafter, the Court referred to Section 26 of the Prisons Act, 1894 and Sections 167 and 309 of the CrPC and adverted to the nature of power exercisable by the … | |Arms Act | |21 |Town PS; 220/14; 17.06.14|302/34/120 B IPC & 27 Arms Act | |22 |C-2; 62/07; 03.08.07 |52 Prisoner Act 1894 | |23 |C-2; 67/08; 01.09.08 |52 Prisoner Act 1894 | |24 |Muffasil PS;

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 29, 30, 30(2), 45, 46, 46(6), 46(7) 46(8), 46(10), 47, 50, 56, 57, 59, 60 and 66; Maintenance of Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) to (6), 20, 20(2), 21, 32, 39A, 42, 72, 132, 134, 136, 161 and 217 - ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1898 - Sections 366, 366(1), 366(2) 395, 401, 415, 433, 434 and 435; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53, 63, 73, 74, 303 and 379; Punjab Jail Rules; Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1971; Larceny Act, 1861

Reported in : AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557

Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, in the case of Batra) of the … are now lodged, and the Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, … him. He is for the time being, the slave of the State 62 v (21 Gratt) 790, 796 (1871).During the century that followed, the American

M. Vijaya Vs. Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Collieries Co. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 20, 21, 38, 39, 47 and 226; Bio-Medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998; Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897; Epidemic Diseases (Amendment) Act, 1987; Andhra Pradesh Public Health Act, 1939 - Sections 52; Societies Registration Act; Drugs Control Act; Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 - Sections 10-A, 17(4) and 19(2); Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 24, 37, 38 and 39; Andhra Pradesh Prisons Rules, 1979 - Rules 583 to 653 and 1007 to 1014; Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 - Sections 2; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 - Sections 32; Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10; Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 - Sections 13; Special Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 269 and 270

Reported in : I(2002)ACC32; 2002ACJ32; 2001(5)ALD522; 2001(5)ALT154

himself. Be that as it may, under Prison Laws, See Sections 24, 37, 38 and 39 of The Prisons Act, 1894 (Central Act 9 of 1894) Rules 583 to 653 (Chapter XXXV) and Rules 1007 to 1014 (Chapter LVII) … transfusion like plasma is estimated to contribute over 5%.38. In rural areas, illiterate people, those belonging economically weaker sections and victims of several social disabilities, even now continue to live in segregated areas with no minimum civic

Sonu Sardar vs.the Union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

and it can be imposed only by a judicial order and not otherwise.72. Since Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 provided for what seemed to be a parallel punishment at the hands of the executive, Mr.Sunil Batra approached … have testified to the good conduct of the... Petitioner.” (Emphasis Supplied) W.P. (Crl) 441/2015 Page 47 of 95 62. The respondents have argued that paragraph 29 is repugnant to the submissions on solitary confinement and thus, the

State Vs. Chandra Bali Singh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 45, 45(1), 46(1), 50 and 52; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20 and 20(2)

Reported in : AIR1960All124; 1960CriLJ203

Constitution - refusal to eat food by prisoners - Section 45(1) and Second Proviso to Section 52 of Prisons Act, 1894 - declining food offered by prison authorities is an offence under the Act - punishment can be inflicted … under the Cantonments Act discharging any such duties. The duties of the Cantonment Board are laid down in Section 62 and amongst others, clause (xiv) lays down the duties of establishing and maintaining or assisting primary schools only.

Rohit Chaturvedi versus State of Uttarakhand & Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 6 S.C.R. 263

of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946; Penal Code, 1860; Prisons Act, 1894; Constitution of India.List of Keywords Uttarakhand State (for Remission/Premature Release of Convicted Prisoners Sentenced to Life Imprisonment by … SCC 481; Laxman Naskar v. State of W.B [2000] Supp. 3 SCR 62 : (2000) 7 SCC 626; Laxman Naskar v. Union of India [2000] … On the basis of a complaint dated 09.05.2003 of the elder sister of the deceased, Case No.162/2003 under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, “IPC”) was registered at Mahanagar Police Station, Lucknow, Uttar

Haroobhai M. Mehta Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1966)7GLR597

not open to petitioners to raise the aforesaid contention. In that case, the validity of the Land Acquisition Act (1894) was being challenged by recourse to an argument different from the one on which it was challenged in … emergency was laid before both Houses of Parliament on November 8, 49, 62, and was approved by Rajya Sabha on November 13, 1962, and by … the Defence of India Rules, 1962, (hereafter called 'the Rules') that petitioners be detained in the Rajkot Central Prison. The orders stated that the State Government was satisfied in regard to the five petitioners that it was … petitions are filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 491(l)(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Act No. V of 1898). Each

Hamdan Vs. Rumsfeld

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

See, e.g. , 1 The War of the Rebellion 248 (2d series 1894) (General Order 1 issued during the Civil War required military commissions to … a Yemeni national, and turned him over to the U. S. military, which, in 2002, transported him to prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Over a year later, the President deemed Hamdan eligible for trial by military commission … and mandamus petitions, Hamdan asserted that the military commission lacks authority to try him because (1) neither congressional Act nor the common law of war supports trial by this commission for conspiracy, an offense that, Hamdan says, … habeas corpus filed by … an alien detained … at Guantanamo Bay.” Section 1005(h)(2) provides that §§1005(e)(2) and (3)-which give the D. C. Circuit “exclusive” … Doe v. Chao, 540 U. S. 614 , 621-623. Pp. 7-20. 2. The Government argues unpersuasively that