Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: prisons act 1894 section 60 · Page 1 of about 81 results (0.042 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 15 2013

Shafi VazruddIn Qureshi Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-15-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitions to this Court. 9. In exercise of powers conferred by sub-clause (5) of Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894 the Government of Maharashtra under Notification of the Home Department, dated 8th March, 1962 framed rules namely the … 20-07-2004, Divisional Commissioner, Pune granted Parole to the Petitioner for 30 days. The Petitioner got it extended by 60 days and then overstayed for 663 days and had to be arrested by the police and brought back

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 1978

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-30-1978

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 29, 30, 30(2), 45, 46, 46(6), 46(7) 46(8), 46(10), 47, 50, 56, 57, 59, 60 and 66; Maintenance of Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) to (6), 20, 20(2), 21, 32, 39A, 42, 72, 132, 134, 136, 161 and 217 - ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1898 - Sections 366, 366(1), 366(2) 395, 401, 415, 433, 434 and 435; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53, 63, 73, 74, 303 and 379; Punjab Jail Rules; Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1971; Larceny Act, 1861

Reported in : AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557

Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, in the case of Batra) of the … are now lodged, and the Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 08 2014

Meharraj Vs. 1)The State of Tamil Nadu,

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-08-2014

Subject : Miscellaneous

interview facility was stopped for a period of three months as prison punishment, under Section 46 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (Central Act IX of 1594). He also submitted that only a minor punishment was awarded for his serious … book.?.78. Chapter 53 deals with medical registers and forms. Register Nos.1102 and 1103 are as follows:- ?.1102.Register Number 60 ?. In the Register of inpatients in Form No.80 referred to in rule 703 the prescribed details in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 30 1955

State Vs. Santokh Singh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-30-1955

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1956CriLJ619

difference between a 'Prison' and a 'Police lock-up'. In my opinion, he is again mistaken. Section 3(1)(a), Indian Prisons Act, 1894 (Act No. 9 of 1894), which has been made applicable to Madhya Bharat State by virtue of the … accused in the police custody is essential for investigation, He placed reliance on the provisions embodied in Sections 60, 61 and 167 Criminal P.C. In my opinion the argument is based on an erroneous view of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1975

Bhanudas Krishna Gawde Vs. K.G. Paranjape and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-01-1975

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ534

or civil prisoners in accordance with the rules contained in the Jail Manual or rules made under the prisons Act. 1894, and in conformity with that Act; and (c) requiring the respondents not to put the detenu in solitary … Halsbury 's Laws of England, 4th Edition, Volume 1, page 67, para 60). It was contended that looking to the history of withdrawal of facilities … then served with a detention order dated the 19th of December. 1974. made by the first respondent under Section 3 (1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1983

Naib Singh S/O Makhan Singh Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-19-1983

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 24, 25, 53, 53-A(1), 53-A(2), 55, 58, 60, 146 and 302; Prisoners Act, 1900 - Sections 32; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 368(2), 383, 384, 386, 402, 402(1), 418, 418(2), 419, 428 and 433; Andaman and Nicobar Manual, 1908 - Sections 1(2), 1(3), 17, 24, 25 and 146; Indian Penal Code (Amendment) Act, 1955 - Sections 53A

Reported in : AIR1983SC855; 1983CriLJ1345; 1983(1)SCALE425; (1983)2SCC454; [1983]2SCR770

popularly called 'Black water' was the most dreaded punishment in India not without reason. Section 59 of the Prisons Act 9 of 1894 - an enactment made for amending the law relating to prisons with a view to … either 'rigorous' or 'simple' depending upon the Court's direction given at the time of sentencing the accused under Section 60, IPC and there is nothing either in the Penal Code or Procedure Codes which indicates that 'imprisonment for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2017

Asha Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-15-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

General of Prisons under Section 29 extracted above.” 28. Thereafter, the Court referred to Section 26 of the Prisons Act, 1894 and Sections 167 and 309 of the CrPC and adverted to the nature of power exercisable by the … to hold that Article 142(1) confers upon this Court powers which can contravene the provisions of Article 32.” 60. Placing reliance on A.R. Antulay v. R.S. Nayak & another[39]., Mr. Naphade would urge that the court cannot

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 06 2006

P. Bharathi Vs. Union Territory of Pondicherry, Rep. by the Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-06-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Employment of Manual Scavengers and Construction of Dry Latrines (Prohibition) Act, 1993; Indian Prisons Act, 1894; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 148 and 302; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 21; Pondicherry Prison Rules, 1969 - Rules 364, 382, 383, 512, 516, 867 and 870

Reported in : 2007CriLJ1413; (2007)1MLJ345

aspects including fundamental rights, facilities, etc. available to prisoners in the light of constitutional provisions as well as Prisons Act. We intend to quote certain passages which are applicable to the case on hand,53. ... The operation of … prison staff (para 29).(4) To deliberate about enacting of new Prison Act to replace the century-old Indian Prison Act, 1894 (para 33). We understand that the National Human Rights Commission has prepared an outline of an all-India statute, … and it shows that the doctor gives treatment to about 40 to 60 prisoners a day, out of the reported number of 108 convicts and … of 1999 and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for one year under Section 148 IPC and imprisonment for life under Section 302 read with 149

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 08 1988

Ramesh Lallu Jakhra Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-08-1988

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1989)2GLR850

with the State Government concerned depending upon the nature of remission. These powers flow from the provisions of Prisons Act, 1894. As far as the power to grant furlough is concerned, it is as per the provisions of 'the … 30 days per year.5. Special 30 days a near by Superintendent and 60 days a year by Inspector General.6. Blood donation 10 days at a … the sanctioning authority as prescribed under the Rules, required to consult the appropriate Government as referred to in Section 432 of the Criminal Procedure Code? This in short is the question which has arisen in this petition.2.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2004

Kishna Vs. State of Raj. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Sep-02-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Prisons Act 1894 - Sections 59; Rajasthan Prisoners Open Air Camp Rules, 1972 - Rules 3, 7, 8, 9 and 10

Reported in : [2005(105)FLR616]; RLW2006(2)Raj898

counsel for the parties.6. In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (18) of Section 59 of the Prisons Act 1894, the State of Rajasthan enacted 1972 Rules for sending convicts to open Air Camps with a view to … Jail Ajmer, for transfer to the Open Air Camp was rejected on the ground that they are above 60 years of age. Since relief sought in these petitions is identical, they are taken up together for disposal.2.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial