Advanced Search Results
Danial H. Walcott Vs. Superintendent, Nagpur Central Prison
Mumbai
Sep-30-1971
Civil
(1972)74BOMLR436
passed in this case has been clearly made in violation of the provisions of Section 46 of the Prisons Act, 1894 and that the order is vitiated as having been passed in violation of the principles of natural justice.9. … is the entry from a register maintained in the Central Jail, called a Register of Punishment, provided by Section 51 of the Prisons Act, 1804. This section reads as follows:51. Entries in punishment-books:(1) In the punishment-book prescribed in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrithish Dey Vs. the State
Kolkata
May-30-1950
Criminal
Constitution of India - Article 20; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 114 and 224; ;Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 12, 46, 51 and 56; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 114
AIR1952Cal319,55CWN140
is as to whether we have any thing to show that he has been so punished.5. Section 45, Prisons Act (Act IX (9) 1894) declares what are prison offences when committed by a prisoner, while Section 48 provides … cell are among the punishments provided. Section 12 of the Act provides for the maintenance of punishment books. Section 51 provides that in the punishment book shall be recorded in respect of every punishment inflicted.6. The learned Magistrate,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDanial H. Walcott J. Prisoner Vs. Superintendent, Nagpur Central Priso ...
Mumbai
Sep-30-1971
Criminal
1972CriLJ673
a register maintained in the Central Jail, called a Register of Punishment, provided by Section 51 of the Prisons Act. 1894. This section reads as follows:51. Entries in punishment-books : - (i) In the punishment-book prescribed in section 12,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Gajanan Mohanlal Sikchi Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.
Mumbai
Feb-28-1992
Criminal
Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 45(12) and 46; Maharashtra Prisons (Discipline) Rules, 1963 - Rule 17; Constitution of India - Article 21
1993(1)BomCR147; (1992)94BOMLR254
included in the articles prohibited. Hence a currency note is a prohibited article within Section 45(12) of the Prisons Act, 1894 and consequently finding of a currency note with a prisoner would be a prison offence.;Before any punishment is … names of witnesses must also be incorporated in the punishment book which is required to be maintained under section 51 of the Prisons Act. All these procedures are required to be followed before the punishment can be inflicted.5.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSendhaji Mathurji and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Gujarat
Aug-01-1980
Criminal
(1981)22GLR451
imprisonment for life awarded to them under Section 302, Indian Penal Code. They have earned remissions under the Prisons Act, 1894, and the Bombay Rules made thereunder. They contend that even though each one of them has served jail … a substitute for imprisonment for life. In other words, period of 20 years which has been specified in Section 51 of the Indian Penal Code is not the statutory upper limit of imprisonment for life. Remissions which a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. Sant Singh @ Pilli Singh Vs. Secretary, Home Department, Government ...
Mumbai
Dec-22-2005
Criminal
Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 51B, 59; Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 - Rules 8(5), 10,11, 12 and 18 to 28; Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) (Amendment) Rules, 1989 - Rule 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 389, 389(1), 401, 426, 432 and 433
2006CriLJ1515; 2006(2)MhLj422
to convicted persons. In exercise of powers conferred by clauses (5) and (28) of Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (IX of 1894), in its application to the State of then Bombay, the Government of then Bombay framed … concession or commit breach of any of the conditions of parole are liable to be punished under Section 51-B of the Prisons Act, 1894, as applicable to the State of Bombay.(2) The District Superintendent of Police concerned
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSahebrao Tukaram Juware (Convict) Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.
Mumbai
Aug-17-2007
Criminal
Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 51B; Prison (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 - Rules 4(4), 19, 22, 22(1) and 22(2)
2008CriLJ134
breach of any of the conditions of parole are liable to be punished under Section 51-B of the Prisons Act, 1894, as applicable to the State of Bombay.(2) The District Superintendent of Police concerned or the Commissioner of Police,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMeharraj Vs. 1)The State of Tamil Nadu,
Chennai
Sep-08-2014
Miscellaneous
as follows:- ?.The entries to be made in the Prisoners Punishment Book (Register No.16) are laid down in Section 51 of the Prisons Act, 1984 (Central Act IX of 1894). The book shall be maintained in Form No.15 … interview facility was stopped for a period of three months as prison punishment, under Section 46 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (Central Act IX of 1594). He also submitted that only a minor punishment was awarded for his serious
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsha Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-15-2017
Land Acquisition
General of Prisons under Section 29 extracted above.” 28. Thereafter, the Court referred to Section 26 of the Prisons Act, 1894 and Sections 167 and 309 of the CrPC and adverted to the nature of power exercisable by the … guaranteed under Article 25(1) of the Constitution, and (2) whether the State Legislatures were competent to enact them?.” 51. It was contended before this Court that the right to propagate one’s religion means the right to convert
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSaibanna S/o Ningappa Natikar Vs. The Union Of India
Karnataka
Aug-17-2023
Land Acquisition
the sentence of death already imposed. The learned counsel would take the Court through Section 30 of the Prisons Act, 1894, to buttress her argument. She would submit that a separate confinement of a death row prisoner is permissible … murder and if the normal sentence prescribed by law for murder is imprisonment for life.” (emphasis in original) 51. O. Chinnappa Reddy, J.in his concurring opinion agreed with the majority opinion and observed: (Mithu case, SCC p.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »