Advanced Search Results

R.P. Vaghela Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Contempt of CourtConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 129, 141, 144 and 215; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 10, 15, 15(2) and 20; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 45; Prisoners (Attendance in Courts) Act, 1955 - Sections 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 49

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3082; (2002)1GLR886

Constitution Bench in Sunil Batra case (supra) negatived the challenge against the constitutionality of Section 56 of the Prisons Act, 1894 which empowered the Jail Superintendent to put a prisoner in irons (which were 'bar-fetters' in that case), when … attendance is required and for their custody during the period of such attendance.6.7 It will be noticed from Section 49 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 that a person arrested shall not be subjected to more restraint

Abdul Wahid Alias Jhunna Mian Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 27, 40 and 49

of the significance of the question involved, we would like to refer to the relevant provisions of the prisons Act, 1894 and the Bihar Jail Manual, and also to some of the decisions of the Apex Court on the … confinement they cannot keep him in cell which amounts to cellular confinement.8. Reference may also be made to Section 49 of the Prisons Act which provides that except by order of a Court of justice no punishment other

Meharraj Vs. 1)The State of Tamil Nadu,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Miscellaneous

interview facility was stopped for a period of three months as prison punishment, under Section 46 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (Central Act IX of 1594). He also submitted that only a minor punishment was awarded for his serious … the Inspector General. (2) No officer subordinate to the Superintendent shall have power to award any punishment whatever.?.56. Section 49 deals with punishments to be in accordance with foregoing sections and it reads as follows: ?.Except by order

Asgar Yusuf Mukadam and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and the Superint ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 31 and 32; Prisons (Maharashtra Amendment) Act, 2000; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 17(1), 19, 19(1), 21 and 32; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 49, 167, 167(2), 436(1), 437, 437(1) and 437(2)

Reported in : 2004CriLJ4312

State. Perused the records.2. The petitioners challenge the vires of Sections 31 and 32, as amended, of the Prisons Act, 1894, hereinafter called as 'the said Act', being in violation of the provisions of Articles 14 and 21 of … Code of Criminal Procedure, it would reveal due adherence to the mandate of Article 21 of the Constitution. Section 49 of the Code clearly provides that 'the person arrested shall not be subjected to more restraint than is

Gurdev Singh and ors. Etc. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors. Overruled

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : CriminalLabour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 23, 43 and 226; ;Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 33 and 35; ;Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 22; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 53

Reported in : AIR1992HP70,1992CriLJ2542

manual work by prisoners sentenced to labour is recognized part of Jail Administration and discipline as envisaged by Prisons Act, 1894 and the Punjab Jail Manual, as applicable to Himachal Pradesh. To prescribe minimum wages for such labour of … for the first three months of labour. Jn Criminal Writ Petition No. 49 of 1985 (Bhag Singh Chauhan v. State of H. P.), in addition … to strike only at certain forms of forced labour leaving it open to the socially or economically powerful sections of the community to exploit the poor and weaker sactions by resorting to other forms of forced labour.

Asha Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

General of Prisons under Section 29 extracted above.” 28. Thereafter, the Court referred to Section 26 of the Prisons Act, 1894 and Sections 167 and 309 of the CrPC and adverted to the nature of power exercisable by the … was not the real controversy. The controversy pertained to a different factual score. The observations made in para 49 of the said judgment really pertain to protection of prisoners in the jail. By taking recourse to the

S.Nalini Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

without jurisdiction. 9.In support of his submission, the learned counsel referred to Sections 42 and 45 of the Prisons Act, 1894, State Prison Rules and the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in STATE OF HARYANA versus GHASEETA RAM … Police, Bagayam Police Station, Vellore. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Special Prison for Women, Vellore..Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for the entire records in C.C.No.70 of 2013 on the

Saibanna S/o Ningappa Natikar Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the sentence of death already imposed. The learned counsel would take the Court through Section 30 of the Prisons Act, 1894, to buttress her argument. She would submit that a separate confinement of a death row prisoner is permissible … by a Full Bench and would place reliance on paragraph Nos.30, 31, 33, 36, 38, 39, 40, 48, 49, 51 and 52. She would then take the Court through B. A. Umesh vs. Union of India and

Sudha Gupta Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 1; Madhya Pradesh Prison Rules, 1968; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 2

Reported in : 1999(2)MPLJ259

could not be controlled despite the requisite treatment.52. It may be noticed that the provisions contained in the Prisons Act 1894 read with the provisions contained in the Madhya Pradesh Prison Rules 1968 amply secure the supply of the … alleged that Vinod Kumar Gupta, the deceased, had been arrested by the police for having committed offences under Sections 353, 336, 337 and 427 Indian Penal Code for breaking the windscreen of Fire- brigade Vehicle No. CPM/7924 … of Charan Jeet Kaur v. Union of India, reported in 1994 ACJ 499, a decision in the case of Abdul Gaffar v. State of M.

Smt. Sudha Gupta and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101; Prisons Act, 1894; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 336, 337, 353 and 427; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 141; Constitution of India - Article 226; Madhya Pradesh Prison Rules 1968 - Rules 1, 13 and 14

Reported in : 1999CriLJ1742

could not be controlled despite the requisite treatment.52. It may be noticed that the provisions contained in the Prisons Act 1894 read with the provision's contained in the Madhya Pradesh Prison Rules 1968 amply secure the supply of the … alleged that Vinod Kumar Gupta, the deceased, had been arrested by the police for having committed offences under Sections 353, 336, 337 and 427, IPC for breaking the windscreen of Fire-brigade vehicle No. CPM/ 7924 by pelting … Charan Jit Kaur v. Union of India reported in 1994 Acc CJ 499 : AIR 1994 SC 1491, a decision in the case of Abdul