Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: prisons act 1894 section 48 · Page 1 of about 77 results (0.028 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 24 2016

Buwaji Sahadeo Hazare Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-24-2016

Subject : Education

is in Kolhapur Central Prison, Kalamba. Constitution of India, 1950 Article 20(2) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 Section 300 Prisons Act, 1894 Section 48(A), Section 59 Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 Section 4(10) Reduction in punishment Petitioner sought for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1986

Bhanuprasad Aditram Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-31-1986

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1987CriLJ1777; (1987)2GLR778

Nadiad. At the same time he committed another offence covered by the provisions of Section 48-A of the Prisons Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' for short). Section 48-A of the Act provides that failure to observe

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 1986

Bhikhabhai Devshi Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-28-1986

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 28, 48A and 59; Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 - Rules 3, 4(10) and 19

Reported in : AIR1987Guj136; (1987)2GLR1178

the parole and furlough rules are framed in exercise of powers under Ss. 59(5) and 28 of the Prisons Act, 1894. Section 3 defines various terms in the Act and Cls. (5A) and (5B) of S. 3 define furlough system, … cases sufficiency of such a cause related to time will certainly have to be considered by the authority. Section 48-A itself provides for cases of later surrender. As seen earlier it provides that if any prisoner fails without

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 26 2000

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Challa Ramkrishna Reddy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-26-2000

Subject : ConstitutionLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 2, 72 and 113; Constitution of India - Articles 19 and 21; Madras Prison Rules - Rules 48; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Prisoners Act, 1871; Crown Proceedings Act, 1947; Law Reform (Contributory) Negligence Act, 1945

Reported in : II(2000)ACC18; 2001ACJ1014; JT2000(6)SC334; 2000(4)SCALE471b; (2000)5SCC712; 2000(2)LC1267(SC)

law, prisoners still retain the residue of constitutional rights.23. 'Prison' has been defined in Section 3(1) of the Prisons Act, 1894 as any jail or place used permanently or temporarily under the general or special orders of State Government … inspection (Ex. A-9) clearly show that the Police Constables guarding the jail were not vigilant, and the P.C. 483, whose duty it was to guard the cell, was probably sleeping at that time. The learned Magistrate has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 1989

Challa Ramkonda Reddy and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh by District ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-17-1989

Subject : Constitution

Acts : General Clasues Act, 1897 - Sections 3; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 59; Madras Prison Rules - Rules 48 and 72; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 2, 72 and 113; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 21, 22(2), 32, 133, 217, 226 and 300(1); Punjab Municipal Act - Sections 132; Charter Act, 1833; Government of India Act, 1858 - Sections 65; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 176(1); Crown Proceedings Act, 1947; Police Act, 1964; Federal Tort Claims Act

Reported in : 1990ACJ668; AIR1989AP235

of the Constitution. (i) Constitution - interpretation - Section 3 of General Clauses Act, 1897, Section 59 of Prisons Act, 1894 and Rule 48 of Madras Prison Rules - application of Rules to enactment - legislature delegates power and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 30 1999

Kalpesh Gunwantlal Soni Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Dec-30-1999

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 48A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Prison Rules, 1959 - Rule 4(5), 4(6) and 4(10); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2001)GLR381

authority, Deputy I.G., Gujarat State, Ahmedabad, in exercise of powers conferred upon it under Section 48-A of the Prisons Act, 1894, as amended by Bombay (Prison Amendment) Act, 1953, imposed the following punishments on the petitioner:(i) He was deprived

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 01 2001

Mohan Suryabhan Chandan Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-01-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Prisons Act - Sections 48-A

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)1106; 2002(2)MhLj203

own illness. He, therefore, contends that the penalty which is imposed in terms of Section 48-A of the Prisons Act, 1894 read with Statutory Rules made by I.G. Prisons, vide Notification No. MJM/1561/39466 dated 2nd July, 1964, is fully

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 26 1992

Shivraj S/O. Hanmantrao Patil Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-26-1992

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 48A; Maharashtra Prisoners Punishment Rules, 1963 - Rule 5

Reported in : 1993(3)BomCR717

is a prison offence by virtue of the provisions of section 48-A inserted by the Maharashtra Amendment in Prisons Act, 1894. Section 48-A is quoted below for the ready reference :---'If any prisoner fails without sufficient cause to observe any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 1990

Haiderkhan Lalkhan Pathan Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Feb-09-1990

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 48A and 52; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 366; Bombay Jail Manual Rules, 1285; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : 1991CriLJ1266; (1990)1GLR498

(iii) that no cumulative punishment can be awarded in view of the provisions of Section 48-A of the Prisons Act, 1894; (iv) that Section 52 of the Prisons Act provides that punishment cannot be for a period of more

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2022

Nkgsb Cooperative Bank Limited Vs. Subir Chakravarty

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-25-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

8 and 22 (“officers subordinate to the Jailer”) and Section 48 (“officer subordinate to the Superintendent”) of the Prisons Act, 1894; Section 195 (“any officer subordinate to the Collector”) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925; Section 34H (“any subordinate officer

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial