Advanced Search Results

M. Vijaya Vs. Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Collieries Co. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 20, 21, 38, 39, 47 and 226; Bio-Medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998; Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897; Epidemic Diseases (Amendment) Act, 1987; Andhra Pradesh Public Health Act, 1939 - Sections 52; Societies Registration Act; Drugs Control Act; Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 - Sections 10-A, 17(4) and 19(2); Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 24, 37, 38 and 39; Andhra Pradesh Prisons Rules, 1979 - Rules 583 to 653 and 1007 to 1014; Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 - Sections 2; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 - Sections 32; Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10; Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 - Sections 13; Special Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 269 and 270

Reported in : I(2002)ACC32; 2002ACJ32; 2001(5)ALD522; 2001(5)ALT154

himself. Be that as it may, under Prison Laws, See Sections 24, 37, 38 and 39 of The Prisons Act, 1894 (Central Act 9 of 1894) Rules 583 to 653 (Chapter XXXV) and Rules 1007 to 1014 (Chapter LVII) … the interveners would submit that having regard to Articles 21, 39 and 47 of the Constitution of India, the problem should be considered in the … transfusion like plasma is estimated to contribute over 5%.38. In rural areas, illiterate people, those belonging economically weaker sections and victims of several social disabilities, even now continue to live in segregated areas with no minimum civic

Meharraj Vs. 1)The State of Tamil Nadu,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Miscellaneous

seven days; (9)Separate confinement for a period exceeding fourteen days; and (10)Any combination of minor punishments admissible under Section 47 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (Central Act IX of 1894) Explanation.--The major punishments (3) and (6) and any … interview facility was stopped for a period of three months as prison punishment, under Section 46 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (Central Act IX of 1594). He also submitted that only a minor punishment was awarded for his serious

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 29, 30, 30(2), 45, 46, 46(6), 46(7) 46(8), 46(10), 47, 50, 56, 57, 59, 60 and 66; Maintenance of Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) to (6), 20, 20(2), 21, 32, 39A, 42, 72, 132, 134, 136, 161 and 217 - ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1898 - Sections 366, 366(1), 366(2) 395, 401, 415, 433, 434 and 435; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53, 63, 73, 74, 303 and 379; Punjab Jail Rules; Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1971; Larceny Act, 1861

Reported in : AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557

Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, in the case of Batra) of the … voice but not in communication with other prisoners. Moreover, punitive separate confinement shall not exceed three months and Section 47 interdicts the combination of cellular confinement and 'separate confinement' so as not to exceed together the periods specified

S.Nalini Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

kinds of punishments on the prisoners subject to the restrictions in Sections 47 to 50 of Prisons Act, 1894. 17.As per Section 52, in case … without jurisdiction. 9.In support of his submission, the learned counsel referred to Sections 42 and 45 of the Prisons Act, 1894, State Prison Rules and the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in STATE OF HARYANA versus GHASEETA RAM … Police, Bagayam Police Station, Vellore. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Special Prison for Women, Vellore..Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for the entire records in C.C.No.70 of 2013 on the

Sonu Sardar vs.the Union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

and it can be imposed only by a judicial order and not otherwise.72. Since Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 provided for what seemed to be a parallel punishment at the hands of the executive, Mr.Sunil Batra approached … entirely excludes a prisoner communication with other prisoners. Moreover, punitive separate confinement shall not exceed three months and Section 47 the combination of cellular confinement and ―separate confinement‖ so as not to exceed together the periods specified there.

Nkgsb Cooperative Bank Limited Vs. Subir Chakravarty

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

8 and 22 (“officers subordinate to the Jailer”) and Section 48 (“officer subordinate to the Superintendent”) of the Prisons Act, 1894; Section 195 (“any officer subordinate to the Collector”) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925; Section 34H (“any subordinate officer … of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Section 2(g) (“subordinate officer”) of the Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949; Section 47 (“his subordinate in rank”) of the Army Act, 1950; Section 17 (“by an officer subordinate to that Government”

Acharaparambath Pradeepan and anr. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 30(2); Kerala Prisons Rules, 1958 - Rule 781; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 366 and 366(2)

Reported in : 2004CriLJ755

to jail under a warrant. They were confined in condemned cell as provided under Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 read with Kerala Prisons Rules, 1958. It is the contention of the petitioners that the sentence of death … from all other prisoners, and shall be placed by day and by night under the charge of guard.'Chapter XLVII of the Kerala Prisons Rules, 1958 (in short Rules) deals with prisoners sentenced to solitary confinement. Chapter XLVIII

Sudha Gupta Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CivilConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 1; Madhya Pradesh Prison Rules, 1968; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 2

Reported in : 1999(2)MPLJ259

could not be controlled despite the requisite treatment.52. It may be noticed that the provisions contained in the Prisons Act 1894 read with the provisions contained in the Madhya Pradesh Prison Rules 1968 amply secure the supply of the … alleged that Vinod Kumar Gupta, the deceased, had been arrested by the police for having committed offences under Sections 353, 336, 337 and 427 Indian Penal Code for breaking the windscreen of Fire- brigade Vehicle No. CPM/7924

Smt. Sudha Gupta and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101; Prisons Act, 1894; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 336, 337, 353 and 427; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 141; Constitution of India - Article 226; Madhya Pradesh Prison Rules 1968 - Rules 1, 13 and 14

Reported in : 1999CriLJ1742

could not be controlled despite the requisite treatment.52. It may be noticed that the provisions contained in the Prisons Act 1894 read with the provision's contained in the Madhya Pradesh Prison Rules 1968 amply secure the supply of the … alleged that Vinod Kumar Gupta, the deceased, had been arrested by the police for having committed offences under Sections 353, 336, 337 and 427, IPC for breaking the windscreen of Fire-brigade vehicle No. CPM/ 7924 by pelting

Justice k.s.puttaswamy(retd) Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Maneka, the Supreme Court considered a challenge to the provisions for solitary confinement under Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 which stipulated that a prisoner “under sentence of death” is to be kept in a cell apart from … see : Robert H Bork, “Neutral Principles and some First Amendment Problems”, Indiana Law Journal (Fall 1971), Vol. 47(1), at pages 8-9 306 Supra note 301 307 Judith Jarvis Thomson, “The Right to Privacy” , Philosophy and