Advanced Search Results

Navkiran Singh Vs. State of Punjab Through Secretary Home Department a ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 42 and 45; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482

Reported in : 1997CriLJ1624

2 i.e. the Superintendent. Security Jail. Nabha. against the petitioner, for an offence under Section 42 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') read with the relevant Rules framed thereunder and contained in the Punjab

Emperor Vs. SaifIn Rasul

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1924)26BOMLR267

a jail to some one outside the jail premises commits the offence punishable under Section 42 of the Prisons Act 1894 read with Article 485 of the Bombay Jail Manual 1911. - MAHARASHTRA SCHEDULED CASTES, SCHEDULED TRIBES, DE-NOTIFIED TRIBES

P. Streenivasa Chetty and Thandayuthapani Chetti Vs. Emperor

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 72Ind.Cas.609

J.1. The first accused was convicted of the offence specified in Clause (3) of Section 42 of the Prisons Act, IX of 1894. He was a prisoner in the Penitentiary and the second accused, an uncle of the

SaifIn Rasul Vs. Emperor

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : AIR1924Bom385; 83Ind.Cas.342

Norman Macleod, C.J.1. The accused was charged with two offences, one under Section 42 of the Prisons Act IX of 1894, read with Article 485 of the Bombay Jail Manual, 1911, the other under Section 161,

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 29, 30, 30(2), 45, 46, 46(6), 46(7) 46(8), 46(10), 47, 50, 56, 57, 59, 60 and 66; Maintenance of Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) to (6), 20, 20(2), 21, 32, 39A, 42, 72, 132, 134, 136, 161 and 217 - ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1898 - Sections 366, 366(1), 366(2) 395, 401, 415, 433, 434 and 435; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53, 63, 73, 74, 303 and 379; Punjab Jail Rules; Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1971; Larceny Act, 1861

Reported in : AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557

Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, in the case of Batra) of the … are now lodged, and the Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, … of unparallelled atrocity or brutality.92. The Law Commission of India in its 42nd Report took the view that solitary confinement was 'out of tune with

S.Nalini Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

without jurisdiction. 9.In support of his submission, the learned counsel referred to Sections 42 and 45 of the Prisons Act, 1894, State Prison Rules and the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in STATE OF HARYANA versus GHASEETA RAM … in Crime No.231 of 2010 was registered for offences under Sections 353, 186 and 201 IPC read with Section 42 of the Prison Act, 1894. 5.Ultimately, in the enquiry conducted by the Jail Superintendent, under Rule 302 (b)(7).the

Varinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

FIR dated 24.09.2009 was filed at the Police Station Ferozepur, under Sections 42 and 45 (12) of the Prisons Act, 1894 (in short “the Act”). The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Ferozepur charged him on 01.05.2010 under Sections 42 and … take all pleas available to him during the trial”.4. The High Court in its impugned order has interpreted Section 42 of the Act, and held that whoever communicates or attempts to communicate with any prisoner is liable for

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Sat NaraIn and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Sections 6, 6(1) and 7(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 9 and 9(2); Constitution of India - Article 245; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1959All218; 1959CriLJ409

Penal Code, Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 (Act II of 1947), Section 42 Prisons Act, 1894 and under Section 109/34, Indian Penal 'Code.'Thereafter, the State Government made another notification dated 3-1-1958, and this was

Varinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.201 dated 24.9.2009 under Sections 42/ 45 (12) of the Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act for short) and Section 540 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at Police Station Ferozepur

Shobha Anil Londase Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19 and 21

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)122

that the members of the jail staff would be liable to be prosecuted under section 54(1) of the Prisons Act, 1894 if any offences under section 42 of the Prisons Act relating to the introduction of or supply to