Advanced Search Results

Abdul Wahid Alias Jhunna Mian Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 27, 40 and 49

of the significance of the question involved, we would like to refer to the relevant provisions of the prisons Act, 1894 and the Bihar Jail Manual, and also to some of the decisions of the Apex Court on the … friends and relatives at will, as and when he likes, it is difficult to accede to the prayer Section 40 of the Prisons Act, apart from the Jail Manual, permits restrictions on visits to under-trial prisoners. Section 40

Kehar Singh and Another Vs. the State and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 73, 74 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 366, 368, 369 and 414

Reported in : 1987CriLJ291; 29(1986)DLT399; 1986(11)DRJ23

be under-trials. 16. Before I discuss the next contention of Mr. Grover, I may refer to S. 30, Prisons Act, 1894, which reads as under : '30. Prisoners under sentence of death. - (1) Every prisoner under sentence of … commitment under the sentence of death is to be in form No. 40. 11. Section 368, Criminal P.C. provides that in any case submitted under … the judgment. He found the petitioners guilty of the offence charged with and sentenced them to death. 9. Section 366, Criminal P.C., which finds place in Chap. Xxviii under the heading 'Submission of death sentences for confirmation'

L. Muruganantham versus State of Tamil Nadu & Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2025] 7 S.C.R. 935

India - 2021;(e) To mandate full accessibility of prisons in Tamil Naduas required under Section 45 read with Section 40 of the RPwD Act, 2016, Rule 15 of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Rules, 2017, and the … Administration [AIR 1980 Supreme Court 1579], it was held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court as follows: “59. The Prisons Act and Rules need revision if a constitutionally and culturally congruous code is to be fashioned. The model jail … with varying disabilities. In Shri Rama Murthy v. State of Karnataka6, this Court noted that the outdated Prison Act, 1894, must be thoroughly overhauled. The appellant submits that systemic disregard for disability rights has led to irreversible harm

Bhanudas Krishna Gawde Vs. K.G. Paranjape and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ534

or civil prisoners in accordance with the rules contained in the Jail Manual or rules made under the prisons Act. 1894, and in conformity with that Act; and (c) requiring the respondents not to put the detenu in solitary … hours, food, clothing, bedding or other necessaries, subject of course to routine examination, and in so far as Section 40 of that Act lays down that provision 'shall be made' for visits to the prison by persons whom

Khaliquz-zaman Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 40(1); Kerala Tax Rules, 1959 - Rule 12; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 9, 13B 54, 54(1), 54(2), 54(3), 56, 86 to 88 and 104; Rajasthan Municipalities Act - Sections 65; Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1947; Constitution of India (74th Amendment) Act, 1992; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 2001; Rajasthan Nathdwara Temple Act - Sections 16; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 19(1), 19(2), 21, 25, 26, 30 31(2), 243R, 243R(2), 243S 243ZA and 289; ;Punjab Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 - Sections 23; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 124A; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 30(2); Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947; Calcutta Municipality Act - Sections 548; Municipal Laws

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC696; (2005)2UPLBEC1200

In Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (supra) the Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894, which provides for solitary confinement of a prisoner under sentence of death in a cell and Section 56 … Constitution.36. In R. L. Arora v. State of U. P. : [1964]6SCR784 the Supreme Court while construing Section 40(1)(aa) of the Land Acquisition Act, as amended by Act 31 of 1962 construed the words 'building or work'

Ashok Kumar Alias Golu Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 32, 72, 141, 161, 245 and 246; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 401, 428, 432 and 433A; Rajasthan Prisons (Shortening of Sentences) Rules, 1958; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 40, 45, 53A, 54, 55, 57, 65, 116, 119, 120, 302, 303, 305, 307, 396 and 511; Indian Penal Code (Amendment) 1978; Orissa Agricultural Income-tax (Amendment) Act, 1950; Orissa Estates Abolition Act, 1952; Prisons Act, 1894; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 433A

Reported in : AIR1991SC1792; 1991CriLJ2483; JT1991(3)SC46; 1991(2)SCALE17; (1991)3SCC498; [1991]2SCR858

based on the Bombay Rules governing the remission system framed in virtue of the provisions contained in the Prisons Act, 1894. This Court pointed out that the Prisons Act did not confer on any authority a power to commute … convicted for a capital offence (this expression was defined by Clause 15 of the Bill recommending substitution of Section 40, I.P.C., as 'an offence for which death is one of the punishments provided by law') or whose sentence

Rapti Commission Agency Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors. Overruled

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 8E, 13A and 13A(1A)

Reported in : [2004]134STC436(All)

Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration : 1978CriLJ1741 the Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894, which provides for solitary confinement of a prisoner under sentences of death in a cell and Section 56 … of the Constitution.50. In R.L. Arora v. State of U.P. : [1964]6SCR784 the Supreme Court while construing Section 40(1)(aa) of the Land Acquisition Act, as amended by Act 31 of 1962 construed the words 'building or work'

Prasoon Sunny vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

judicial custody at District Jail Kakkanad.WP(C).30827/2022 -:3:-3. It is submitted by the petitioner that Section 40 of ThePrison Act, 1894, Section 47 of The Kerala Prisons and Correctional Services (Management) Act, 2010 and Rule 827 (2) of the Kerala

Asha Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

General of Prisons under Section 29 extracted above.” 28. Thereafter, the Court referred to Section 26 of the Prisons Act, 1894 and Sections 167 and 309 of the CrPC and adverted to the nature of power exercisable by the … and just application of its principles in substance, to find out the truth and prevent miscarriage of justice.” 40. In Mohd. Hussain @ Julfikar Ali (supra) the three-Judge Bench has drawn a distinction between the speedy trial

Dr. M. Karunanidhi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by Its Secretary, Hom ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1994CriLJ2599

that it has become infructuous since we are considering the same question in the other writ petitions.2. The Prisons Act, 1894 (Central Act IX of 1894) empowers the Government to make rules. Section 59 provides for the same. Section … 1894 (Central Act IX of 1894) empowers the Government to make rules. Section 59 provides for the same. Section 40 of the said Act provides that due provision shall be made for the admission at proper times and