Advanced Search Results

M. Vijaya Vs. Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Collieries Co. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 20, 21, 38, 39, 47 and 226; Bio-Medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998; Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897; Epidemic Diseases (Amendment) Act, 1987; Andhra Pradesh Public Health Act, 1939 - Sections 52; Societies Registration Act; Drugs Control Act; Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 - Sections 10-A, 17(4) and 19(2); Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 24, 37, 38 and 39; Andhra Pradesh Prisons Rules, 1979 - Rules 583 to 653 and 1007 to 1014; Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 - Sections 2; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 - Sections 32; Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10; Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 - Sections 13; Special Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 269 and 270

Reported in : I(2002)ACC32; 2002ACJ32; 2001(5)ALD522; 2001(5)ALT154

himself. Be that as it may, under Prison Laws, See Sections 24, 37, 38 and 39 of The Prisons Act, 1894 (Central Act 9 of 1894) Rules 583 to 653 (Chapter XXXV) and Rules 1007 to 1014 (Chapter LVII) … transfusion like plasma is estimated to contribute over 5%.38. In rural areas, illiterate people, those belonging economically weaker sections and victims of several social disabilities, even now continue to live in segregated areas with no minimum civic

Rapti Commission Agency Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors. Overruled

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 8E, 13A and 13A(1A)

Reported in : [2004]134STC436(All)

Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration : 1978CriLJ1741 the Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894, which provides for solitary confinement of a prisoner under sentences of death in a cell and Section 56 … v. Munshiram Madan Lal 2001 UPTC 343 vide annexures 8 and 9 to the writ petition.11. In paragraph 38 of the writ petition it is alleged that photocopies of the documents accompanying the consignment clearly show that

Suo Motu Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 389; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 6, 7, 13, 14, 18, 22, 24(2), 24(3), 26, 37, 38, 39 and 59; Prisoners Act, 1900 - Sections 29(1); Gujarat [Removal of Prisoners] Order, 1976; Prisoners Rules, 1973; Prison Regulations; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2088

case, we may first of all turn our attention to certain relevant provisions of the prison legislations.7.2. The Prisons Act, 1894 provides for appointment of officers of prisons including Medical Officer. Section 6 reads as under :-'6. Officers of … this Court vide order dated 28th September, 2004. He also preferred, along with the appeal, application under section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure [for short 'Cr.P.C.'] praying for suspension of sentence and to release him

Asha Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

General of Prisons under Section 29 extracted above.” 28. Thereafter, the Court referred to Section 26 of the Prisons Act, 1894 and Sections 167 and 309 of the CrPC and adverted to the nature of power exercisable by the … witnessed the murder managed to escape and a criminal case was registered against him under Sections 341, 323, 380, 364, 435/34 IPC for abduction, etc. of the petitioner’s two sons in which charges were framed on 04.06.2010

Gauri Shanker and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 25, 25(1) and 25A; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 311

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC426

In Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (Supra) the Supreme Court upheld the validity off Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894, which provides for solitary confinement of a prisoner under sentence of death in a cell and Section 56 … rule so as to sustain its validity.18. Similarly in Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration : 1978CriLJ1741 [vide para 38) another Constitution Bench decision of the Supreme Court observed :'Constitutional deference to the Legislature and the democratic assumption

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 29, 30, 30(2), 45, 46, 46(6), 46(7) 46(8), 46(10), 47, 50, 56, 57, 59, 60 and 66; Maintenance of Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) to (6), 20, 20(2), 21, 32, 39A, 42, 72, 132, 134, 136, 161 and 217 - ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1898 - Sections 366, 366(1), 366(2) 395, 401, 415, 433, 434 and 435; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53, 63, 73, 74, 303 and 379; Punjab Jail Rules; Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1971; Larceny Act, 1861

Reported in : AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557

Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, in the case of Batra) of the … are now lodged, and the Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, … some American decisions have neatly put it Federal Reporter 2d. Series, Vol. 386, p. 684; Donnel Douglas v. Maurice H. Sigler.The matter of internal management

Saibanna S/o Ningappa Natikar Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the sentence of death already imposed. The learned counsel would take the Court through Section 30 of the Prisons Act, 1894, to buttress her argument. She would submit that a separate confinement of a death row prisoner is permissible … India and Others5 rendered by a Full Bench and would place reliance on paragraph Nos.30, 31, 33, 36, 38, 39, 40, 48, 49, 51 and 52. She would then take the Court through B. A. Umesh vs.

The State Of Haryana Vs. Raj Kumar @ Bittu

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

held that these policies of remission are in exercise of the powers conferred under Section 59(5) of the Prisons Act, 1894, contemplating “for the award of marks and the shortening of sentences” and thus, they are statutory rules. Sections … at the time of his conviction. This conclusion was arrived on the following ground: (SCC p. 619, para38) 38. A right to be considered for remission, keeping in view the constitutional safeguards of a convict under Articles

B.a. Umesh Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the health and well-being of the appellant was obviously because of the mandate of Section 29 of the Prisons Act, 1894 which is to the following effect: - “29. Solitary confinement. - No cell shall be used for solitary … the resultant effect, as also the scope and ambit of exercise of power, it was observed in paras 38, 41 and 42 as under: (SCC pp. 38-39)"44. In view of the above, we hold that undue long

Ajay Kumar Pal Vs. Union of India and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

solitary confinement i.e. since the day he was awarded death sentence. While dealing with Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894, which postulates segregation of a person 'under sentence of death' Krishna Iyer J.in Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration[5]. … the resultant effect, as also the scope and ambit of exercise of power, it was observed in paras 38, 41 and 42 as under:-"8. In view of the above, we hold that undue long delay in execution