Advanced Search Results

Devpuri Hirapuri Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 161; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20(2) and 32(A); Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3(1) and 59; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 27, 33, 432, 433, 434 and 462

Reported in : (1999)3GLR880

contained in Bombay Jail Manual have been framed pursuant to the power conferred under Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894. Section 59 would read as under;'59. Power to make rules.___(1) The State Government may, by notification in the Official … Procedure, 1973 or any other law for the time being in force but subject to the provisions of section 33 no sentence awarded under this Act (other than section 27) shall be suspended or remitted or commuted.'It might

Asha Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

General of Prisons under Section 29 extracted above.” 28. Thereafter, the Court referred to Section 26 of the Prisons Act, 1894 and Sections 167 and 309 of the CrPC and adverted to the nature of power exercisable by the … | | |24.04.05 | | |13 |C-2; 27/09; 16.03.09 |52 Prisoner Act 1984 | |14 |Siwan Rail PS; 33/97; |147/148/149/341/323/353/ 504 IPC| | |02.09.97 |@ 27 Arms Act | |15 |Muffasil PS; 131/06; |189/353/506 IPC | |

Rapti Commission Agency Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors. Overruled

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 8E, 13A and 13A(1A)

Reported in : [2004]134STC436(All)

Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration : 1978CriLJ1741 the Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894, which provides for solitary confinement of a prisoner under sentences of death in a cell and Section 56 … 1975 SC 2016, etc.24. In V.K. Singhal v. State of U.P [1995] 97 STC 355 ; 1995 UPTC 337, this Court upheld the validity of Section 8-D and observed that the power to impose tax also includes

Gurdev Singh and ors. Etc. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors. Overruled

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : CriminalLabour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 23, 43 and 226; ;Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 33 and 35; ;Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 22; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 53

Reported in : AIR1992HP70,1992CriLJ2542

manual work by prisoners sentenced to labour is recognized part of Jail Administration and discipline as envisaged by Prisons Act, 1894 and the Punjab Jail Manual, as applicable to Himachal Pradesh. To prescribe minimum wages for such labour of … to strike only at certain forms of forced labour leaving it open to the socially or economically powerful sections of the community to exploit the poor and weaker sactions by resorting to other forms of forced labour. … Union case (supra) was reiterated again when the Court said (at p. 333) (of AIR 1983 SC 328).'I must, therefore, hold consistently with this decision

The State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Saeed Sohail Sheikh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999; Maharashtra Prison (Discipline) Rules of 1963; Prisoners Act, 1900 - Section 29; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Sections 167, 309

proposition. It was all the same argued that if the provisions of the Prisoners Act, 1900 and the Prisons Act, 1894 did not empower the Inspector General of Prisons to transfer the undertrial, the only other mode of such … undertrials to oppose the same. The High Court rejected the contention urged on behalf of the appellants that Section 29 of the Prisoners Act, 1900 empowers the State Government or the Inspector General of Prisons to transfer … be deemed to be to so released under the provisions of Chapter XXXIII for the purposes of that Chapter;(b) no Magistrate shall authorise detention in

P. Bharathi Vs. Union Territory of Pondicherry, Rep. by the Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Employment of Manual Scavengers and Construction of Dry Latrines (Prohibition) Act, 1993; Indian Prisons Act, 1894; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 148 and 302; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 21; Pondicherry Prison Rules, 1969 - Rules 364, 382, 383, 512, 516, 867 and 870

Reported in : 2007CriLJ1413; (2007)1MLJ345

prison staff (para 29).(4) To deliberate about enacting of new Prison Act to replace the century-old Indian Prison Act, 1894 (para 33). We understand that the National Human Rights Commission has prepared an outline of an all-India statute, … aspects including fundamental rights, facilities, etc. available to prisoners in the light of constitutional provisions as well as Prisons Act. We intend to quote certain passages which are applicable to the case on hand,53. ... The operation of … of 1999 and sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for one year under Section 148 IPC and imprisonment for life under Section 302 read with 149

S.Nalini Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

without jurisdiction. 9.In support of his submission, the learned counsel referred to Sections 42 and 45 of the Prisons Act, 1894, State Prison Rules and the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in STATE OF HARYANA versus GHASEETA RAM … Police, Bagayam Police Station, Vellore. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Special Prison for Women, Vellore..Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for the entire records in C.C.No.70 of 2013 on the … the major punishment of permanent reduction of 'A' Class to 'B' Class. 33.When the prisoner questioned the said punishment in H.C.P.No.1357 of 2011 before a

Kalpesh Gunwantlal Soni Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 48A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Prison Rules, 1959 - Rule 4(5), 4(6) and 4(10); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2001)GLR381

authority, Deputy I.G., Gujarat State, Ahmedabad, in exercise of powers conferred upon it under Section 48-A of the Prisons Act, 1894, as amended by Bombay (Prison Amendment) Act, 1953, imposed the following punishments on the petitioner:(i) He was deprived

State Vs. Santokh Singh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1956CriLJ619

difference between a 'Prison' and a 'Police lock-up'. In my opinion, he is again mistaken. Section 3(1)(a), Indian Prisons Act, 1894 (Act No. 9 of 1894), which has been made applicable to Madhya Bharat State by virtue of the … or to remove him from Jail. How can then, it order him to be handed over to Police?9. Section 33, M. B. Prisoners Act (which corresponds to Section 41 of the Central Act), then lays down that upon

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 29, 30, 30(2), 45, 46, 46(6), 46(7) 46(8), 46(10), 47, 50, 56, 57, 59, 60 and 66; Maintenance of Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) to (6), 20, 20(2), 21, 32, 39A, 42, 72, 132, 134, 136, 161 and 217 - ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1898 - Sections 366, 366(1), 366(2) 395, 401, 415, 433, 434 and 435; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53, 63, 73, 74, 303 and 379; Punjab Jail Rules; Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1971; Larceny Act, 1861

Reported in : AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557

Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, in the case of Batra) of the … are now lodged, and the Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, … reinforcement from the observations of Mr. Justice Douglas in Morrissey v. Brewer 33 L. Ed. 484, 505.The rule of law is important in the stability