Advanced Search Results

Acharaparambath Pradeepan and anr. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 30(2); Kerala Prisons Rules, 1958 - Rule 781; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 366 and 366(2)

Reported in : 2004CriLJ755

to jail under a warrant. They were confined in condemned cell as provided under Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 read with Kerala Prisons Rules, 1958. It is the contention of the petitioners that the sentence of death

Khaliquz-zaman Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Land Acquisition Act - Sections 40(1); Kerala Tax Rules, 1959 - Rule 12; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 9, 13B 54, 54(1), 54(2), 54(3), 56, 86 to 88 and 104; Rajasthan Municipalities Act - Sections 65; Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1947; Constitution of India (74th Amendment) Act, 1992; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 2001; Rajasthan Nathdwara Temple Act - Sections 16; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 19(1), 19(2), 21, 25, 26, 30 31(2), 243R, 243R(2), 243S 243ZA and 289; ;Punjab Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 - Sections 23; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 124A; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 30(2); Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947; Calcutta Municipality Act - Sections 548; Municipal Laws

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC696; (2005)2UPLBEC1200

In Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (supra) the Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894, which provides for solitary confinement of a prisoner under sentence of death in a cell and Section 56

Gauri Shanker and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 25, 25(1) and 25A; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 311

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC426

In Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (Supra) the Supreme Court upheld the validity off Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894, which provides for solitary confinement of a prisoner under sentence of death in a cell and Section 56

Rapti Commission Agency Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors. Overruled

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 8E, 13A and 13A(1A)

Reported in : [2004]134STC436(All)

Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration : 1978CriLJ1741 the Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894, which provides for solitary confinement of a prisoner under sentences of death in a cell and Section 56

Sri Indra Das Vs. State of Assam

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 - Section 3(5); Prisons Act, 1894 - Section 30(2); Constitution Of India - Articles 25, 26

vs. Delhi Administration AIR 1978 SC 1675 the Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894, which provides for solitary confinement of a prisoner under sentence of death in a cell and Section 56

Vikram Aditya Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 8, 8(1) and 19; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 30, 30(2) and 56; Delhi Hindu Marriage Registration Rules, 1956

Reported in : AIR2007Delhi101; 2006(92)DRJ650

of the said judgment reads as follows:34. Batra puts in issue the constitutionality of Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, for short) while Sobraj impugns the virus of Section 56. But, the Court does not 'rush

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 29, 30, 30(2), 45, 46, 46(6), 46(7) 46(8), 46(10), 47, 50, 56, 57, 59, 60 and 66; Maintenance of Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) to (6), 20, 20(2), 21, 32, 39A, 42, 72, 132, 134, 136, 161 and 217 - ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1898 - Sections 366, 366(1), 366(2) 395, 401, 415, 433, 434 and 435; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53, 63, 73, 74, 303 and 379; Punjab Jail Rules; Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1971; Larceny Act, 1861

Reported in : AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557

Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, in the case of Batra) of the … is perilously near unconstitutionality.Court's interpretative function when faced with invalidatory alternative.38. Batra puts in issue the constitutionality of Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, for short) while Sobhraj impugns the vires of Section 56. But

Rajib Mukhopadhyaya and ors. Vs. Registrar Cooperative Societies

Court : Delhi

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Delhi Cooperative Societies Act - Sections 4, 13(8), 13(9), 20(1) and 97; Societies Registration Act; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 29, 30, 30(2) and 56; Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, 1973 - Rules 24(2), 34A, 36A and 41A; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 19(1), 19(4) and 31A(1)

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT321; 2007(97)DRJ273

of the said judgment reads as follows:34. Batra puts in issue the constitutionality of Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, for short) while Sobraj impugns the virus of Section 56. But, the Court does not 'rush

Kehar Singh and Another Vs. the State and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 73, 74 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 366, 368, 369 and 414

Reported in : 1987CriLJ291; 29(1986)DLT399; 1986(11)DRJ23

be under-trials. 16. Before I discuss the next contention of Mr. Grover, I may refer to S. 30, Prisons Act, 1894, which reads as under : '30. Prisoners under sentence of death. - (1) Every prisoner under sentence of … are covered by the Prison Rules. 44. Order accordingly. Code of Criminal Procedure - Sections 366, 368 and Section 30 of the Prisons Act, 1814 - Petitioners were convicted and sentenced to death by Sessions Judge and were

Bhanudas Krishna Gawde Vs. K.G. Paranjape and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ534

or civil prisoners in accordance with the rules contained in the Jail Manual or rules made under the prisons Act. 1894, and in conformity with that Act; and (c) requiring the respondents not to put the detenu in solitary … cited in another context, the detenu who had been detained under Rule 30 (1) (b) of the Defence of India Rules, 1962, had written, with … then served with a detention order dated the 19th of December. 1974. made by the first respondent under Section 3 (1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to