Advanced Search Results

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 29, 30, 30(2), 45, 46, 46(6), 46(7) 46(8), 46(10), 47, 50, 56, 57, 59, 60 and 66; Maintenance of Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) to (6), 20, 20(2), 21, 32, 39A, 42, 72, 132, 134, 136, 161 and 217 - ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1898 - Sections 366, 366(1), 366(2) 395, 401, 415, 433, 434 and 435; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53, 63, 73, 74, 303 and 379; Punjab Jail Rules; Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1971; Larceny Act, 1861

Reported in : AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557

Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, in the case of Batra) of the … be intended to permit preventive solitary confinement, released even from the restrictions of Section 73 and 74 I.P.C., Section 29 of the Prisons Act and the restrictive Prison Rules. It would be extraordinary that a far worse solitary

Rajib Mukhopadhyaya and ors. Vs. Registrar Cooperative Societies

Court : Delhi

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Delhi Cooperative Societies Act - Sections 4, 13(8), 13(9), 20(1) and 97; Societies Registration Act; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 29, 30, 30(2) and 56; Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, 1973 - Rules 24(2), 34A, 36A and 41A; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 19(1), 19(4) and 31A(1)

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT321; 2007(97)DRJ273

of the said judgment reads as follows:34. Batra puts in issue the constitutionality of Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, for short) while Sobraj impugns the virus of Section 56. But, the Court does not 'rush … by this Court, once a society has been registered under the Act, the management of the society through Section 29 and the Rules made there under, is regulated by duty elected members. In the democratic set up, all

Suo Motu Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 389; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 6, 7, 13, 14, 18, 22, 24(2), 24(3), 26, 37, 38, 39 and 59; Prisoners Act, 1900 - Sections 29(1); Gujarat [Removal of Prisoners] Order, 1976; Prisoners Rules, 1973; Prison Regulations; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2088

case, we may first of all turn our attention to certain relevant provisions of the prison legislations.7.2. The Prisons Act, 1894 provides for appointment of officers of prisons including Medical Officer. Section 6 reads as under :-'6. Officers of … has issued Gujarat [Removal of Prisoners] Order, 1976 in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 29 of the Prisoners Act, 1900. Section 3 provides for circumstances for removal. It states that prisoners may be

Meharraj Vs. 1)The State of Tamil Nadu,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Miscellaneous

interview facility was stopped for a period of three months as prison punishment, under Section 46 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (Central Act IX of 1594). He also submitted that only a minor punishment was awarded for his serious … removed from one prisoner to another, but subject to certain conditions.52. Chapter V deals with discipline of prisoners. Section 29 of the Act reads as follows:- ?.29. Solitary confinement.?. No cell shall be used for solitary confinement unless

Subhash Hiralal Bhosale Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

objects, the parole and furlough rules are framed in exercise of powers under Ss.59(5) and 28 of the Prisons Act, 1894. Section 3 defines various terms in the Act and Cls. (5A) and (5B) of S.3 define furlough system and … against him at the Hinjewadi police station. Thirdly, there are adverse reports of the above two authorities dated 29th March 2012. 9] Finally, Mr.Najmi submits that the rejection is also on the ground that the petitioner is

The State of Jharkhand & Others versus Vikash Tiwary @ Bikash Tiwa ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]2S.C.R.63

Acts Arms Act, 1959; Explosive Substances Act, 1908; Prisoners Act, 1900; Model Prisons and Correctional Services Act, 2023; Prisons Act, 1894; Penal Code, 1860; Constitution of India. List of Keywords Section 29 of Prisoners Act, 1900; Transfer to another

The State of Maharashtra and ors. Vs. Saeed Sohail Sheikh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999; Maharashtra Prison (Discipline) Rules of 1963; Prisoners Act, 1900 - Section 29; Code Of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Sections 167, 309

proposition. It was all the same argued that if the provisions of the Prisoners Act, 1900 and the Prisons Act, 1894 did not empower the Inspector General of Prisons to transfer the undertrial, the only other mode of such … undertrials to oppose the same. The High Court rejected the contention urged on behalf of the appellants that Section 29 of the Prisoners Act, 1900 empowers the State Government or the Inspector General of Prisons to transfer the

B.a. Umesh Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the health and well-being of the appellant was obviously because of the mandate of Section 29 of the Prisons Act, 1894 which is to the following effect: - “29. Solitary confinement. - No cell shall be used for solitary

Mr B A Umesh Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

the health and well-being of the appellant was obviously because of the mandate of Section 29 of the Prisons Act, 1894 which is to the following effect:- “29. Solitary confinement.-. No cell shall be used for solitary confinement unless

Sonu Sardar vs.the Union of India & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

and it can be imposed only by a judicial order and not otherwise.72. Since Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 provided for what seemed to be a parallel punishment at the hands of the executive, Mr.Sunil Batra approached … 441/2015 Page 54 of 95 is solitary cell confinement. That the restrictions of Sections 73 and 74 IPC, Section 29 of the Prisons Act and the restrictive Prison Rules. It would be extraordinary that a far worse solitary