Advanced Search Results

Bhikhabhai Devshi Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 28, 48A and 59; Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 - Rules 3, 4(10) and 19

Reported in : AIR1987Guj136; (1987)2GLR1178

the parole and furlough rules are framed in exercise of powers under Ss. 59(5) and 28 of the Prisons Act, 1894. Section 3 defines various terms in the Act and Cls. (5A) and (5B) of S. 3 define furlough system,

Subhash Hiralal Bhosale Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

objects, the parole and furlough rules are framed in exercise of powers under Ss.59(5) and 28 of the Prisons Act, 1894. Section 3 defines various terms in the Act and Cls. (5A) and (5B) of S.3 define furlough system and

S.Nalini Vs. State

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

without jurisdiction. 9.In support of his submission, the learned counsel referred to Sections 42 and 45 of the Prisons Act, 1894, State Prison Rules and the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in STATE OF HARYANA versus GHASEETA RAM … Police, Bagayam Police Station, Vellore. 2.The Superintendent of Police, Special Prison for Women, Vellore..Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to call for the entire records in C.C.No.70 of 2013 on the … permanent reduction from 'A' class to 'B' class awarded to her on 28.5.2010 has been set aside by a Division Bench of this court on

Dinesh Kumar and Others Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

granted furlough. The Full Bench held that such a provision was not inconsistent with Section 48A of the Prisons Act, 1894. The Court held that as far as the first part of Rule 4(1) is concerned, in respect of … PS C.R. Park on 23.4.2004 by the Additional Sessions judge and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life on 28.4.2004 The petitioner was also convicted under Section 302 IPC in case FIR No. 509/1995 P.S. Vasant Kunj on

Bans NaraIn Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 10, 59(1) and 59(28); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 16

Reported in : AIR1977All6

but without any order as to costs. Service - prison rules - Sections 10 and 59 (28) of Prisons Act, 1894 and Rule 1135 of Chapter XII of Jail Manual U.P. - Rule provides power to Government to make … opposite parties strongly refuted the suggestion and argued that the source of authority for the rule lay in Section 59(10) of the said Act. Section 59(10) authorises the State Government to make rules consistent with the Act:--'For

S. Sant Singh @ Pilli Singh Vs. Secretary, Home Department, Government ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 51B, 59; Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 - Rules 8(5), 10,11, 12 and 18 to 28; Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) (Amendment) Rules, 1989 - Rule 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 389, 389(1), 401, 426, 432 and 433

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1515; 2006(2)MhLj422

to convicted persons. In exercise of powers conferred by clauses (5) and (28) of Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (IX of 1894), in its application to the State of then Bombay, the Government of then Bombay framed

Sharad Devaram Shelake Vs. The State of Maharashtra (Home Ministry)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

objects, the parole and furlough rules are framed in exercise of powers under Ss.59(5) and 28 of the Prisons Act, 1894. Section 3 defines various terms in the Act and Cls. (5A) and (5B) of S.3 define furlough system and

Santosh Namdeo Bhukan Vs. The State of Maharashtra (Home Ministry)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

objects, the parole and furlough rules are framed in exercise of powers under Ss.59(5) and 28 of the Prisons Act, 1894. Section 3 defines various terms in the Act and Cls. (5A) and (5B) of S.3 define furlough system and

Rapti Commission Agency Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors. Overruled

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Trade Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 2, 8E, 13A and 13A(1A)

Reported in : [2004]134STC436(All)

Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration : 1978CriLJ1741 the Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894, which provides for solitary confinement of a prisoner under sentences of death in a cell and Section 56 … that this or that method should have been adopted. As Mr. Justice Cardozo observed in Anderson v. Wilson 289 US 20 :'We do not pause to consider whether a statute differently conceived and framed would yield results

Tmt. Rohini Lingam Vs. State Represented by the Secretary to Governmen ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 302, 307, 332, 324, 342 and 448; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1); Indian Explosive Substances Act - Sections 56; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3(1), 4, 19, 20, 59 and 59(8); Prisoners' Act, 1900; Tamil Nadu Prison Rules, 1983 - Rules 1, 32, 34, 44 and 71; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1882 - Sections 541; Constitution of India - Articles 9(5), 21, 32 and 226

Reported in : (2008)5MLJ822

is also relevant to find out some more factual aspects and provisions of the relevant statutes. Under the Prisons Act, 1894 the term 'prison' is defined under Section 3(1), which is as follows:Section 3(1) 'Prison' means any jail or … tortious principle of strict liability under the rule in Rylands v. Fletcher. It was further held in para 28 as follows: 28...The liability was also said to arise out of the use of ultra-hazardous chemical poisons said