Advanced Search Results

Bhanudas Krishna Gawde Vs. K.G. Paranjape and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ534

or civil prisoners in accordance with the rules contained in the Jail Manual or rules made under the prisons Act. 1894, and in conformity with that Act; and (c) requiring the respondents not to put the detenu in solitary … 9 (iii). 10, 12 (ii) and (xi). 15, 19. 20, 21, 23, 24 and 31. It may be clarified that in the present petition there … then served with a detention order dated the 19th of December. 1974. made by the first respondent under Section 3 (1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to

U.L. Telgaonkar Vs. The State of Maharashtra Through Secretary and Oth ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : MRTP

referred them to the Civil Hospital, Beed. The learned counsel invited our attention to section 24(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 and would submit that, every criminal prisoner shall also, as soon as possible after admission, be examined under

M. Vijaya Vs. Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Collieries Co. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 20, 21, 38, 39, 47 and 226; Bio-Medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998; Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897; Epidemic Diseases (Amendment) Act, 1987; Andhra Pradesh Public Health Act, 1939 - Sections 52; Societies Registration Act; Drugs Control Act; Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956 - Sections 10-A, 17(4) and 19(2); Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 24, 37, 38 and 39; Andhra Pradesh Prisons Rules, 1979 - Rules 583 to 653 and 1007 to 1014; Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 - Sections 2; Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936 - Sections 32; Indian Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 10; Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 - Sections 13; Special Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 27; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 269 and 270

Reported in : I(2002)ACC32; 2002ACJ32; 2001(5)ALD522; 2001(5)ALT154

himself. Be that as it may, under Prison Laws, See Sections 24, 37, 38 and 39 of The Prisons Act, 1894 (Central Act 9 of 1894) Rules 583 to 653 (Chapter XXXV) and Rules 1007 to 1014 (Chapter LVII) … transfusion like plasma is estimated to contribute over 5%.38. In rural areas, illiterate people, those belonging economically weaker sections and victims of several social disabilities, even now continue to live in segregated areas with no minimum civic

R.P. Vaghela Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Contempt of CourtConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 129, 141, 144 and 215; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 10, 15, 15(2) and 20; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 45; Prisoners (Attendance in Courts) Act, 1955 - Sections 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 49

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3082; (2002)1GLR886

Constitution Bench in Sunil Batra case (supra) negatived the challenge against the constitutionality of Section 56 of the Prisons Act, 1894 which empowered the Jail Superintendent to put a prisoner in irons (which were 'bar-fetters' in that case), when … Bharatkumar Amrutlal Maniyar was jointly tried for offence under Section 302 I.P.C., with other co-accused was produced on 24-1-2000. According to the report of the Joint District and Sessions Judge, inside the Court room as he saw

Rajib Mukhopadhyaya and ors. Vs. Registrar Cooperative Societies

Court : Delhi

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Delhi Cooperative Societies Act - Sections 4, 13(8), 13(9), 20(1) and 97; Societies Registration Act; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 29, 30, 30(2) and 56; Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, 1973 - Rules 24(2), 34A, 36A and 41A; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19, 19(1), 19(4) and 31A(1)

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT321; 2007(97)DRJ273

of the said judgment reads as follows:34. Batra puts in issue the constitutionality of Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, for short) while Sobraj impugns the virus of Section 56. But, the Court does not 'rush … Mukul Mudgal, J.1. These group of writ petitions challenge the virus of Rule 24(2) of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Rules, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as DCS Rules) as amended on 6th August,

Asha Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

General of Prisons under Section 29 extracted above.” 28. Thereafter, the Court referred to Section 26 of the Prisons Act, 1894 and Sections 167 and 309 of the CrPC and adverted to the nature of power exercisable by the

N. Bhuvaneswari Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secret ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

prisoners still retain the residue of constitutional rights. 23 "Prison" has been defined in Section 3(1) of the Prisons Act, 1894 as any jail or place used permanently or temporarily under the general or special orders of State Government … Batra vs. Delhi Administration and others [(1978) 4 SCC 494]. 6. Mr. Rajagopal relied upon paragraph nos.22 to 24 in Challa Ramkrishna Reddy's case (supra) of which much emphasis was placed on paragraph 24. 22 Right to

Suo Motu Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 389; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 6, 7, 13, 14, 18, 22, 24(2), 24(3), 26, 37, 38, 39 and 59; Prisoners Act, 1900 - Sections 29(1); Gujarat [Removal of Prisoners] Order, 1976; Prisoners Rules, 1973; Prison Regulations; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2088

case, we may first of all turn our attention to certain relevant provisions of the prison legislations.7.2. The Prisons Act, 1894 provides for appointment of officers of prisons including Medical Officer. Section 6 reads as under :-'6. Officers of … IV of the said Act deals with admission, removal and discharge of prisoners. Sub-sections (2) and (3) of section 24 and section 26 are relevant for our purpose. They are as under :-'24. Prisoners to be examined on

Meharraj Vs. 1)The State of Tamil Nadu,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Miscellaneous

interview facility was stopped for a period of three months as prison punishment, under Section 46 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (Central Act IX of 1594). He also submitted that only a minor punishment was awarded for his serious … shall give immediate notice thereof to the Jailor.?.50. Chapter IV deals with admission, removal and discharge of prisoners. Section 24 of the Act, deals with prisoners to be examined on admission, which reads as follows:- ?.(1) Whenever a

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 29, 30, 30(2), 45, 46, 46(6), 46(7) 46(8), 46(10), 47, 50, 56, 57, 59, 60 and 66; Maintenance of Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) to (6), 20, 20(2), 21, 32, 39A, 42, 72, 132, 134, 136, 161 and 217 - ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1898 - Sections 366, 366(1), 366(2) 395, 401, 415, 433, 434 and 435; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53, 63, 73, 74, 303 and 379; Punjab Jail Rules; Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1971; Larceny Act, 1861

Reported in : AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557

Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, in the case of Batra) of the … are now lodged, and the Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, … restrictive construction.43. A note in Harvard Law Review Hervard Law Review, Vol. 24 (1910-11) p. 54-55 commenting on Weems v. United States urges such a