Advanced Search Results

Gurdev Singh and ors. Etc. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors. Overruled

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Subject : CriminalLabour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 23, 43 and 226; ;Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 33 and 35; ;Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 22; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 53

Reported in : AIR1992HP70,1992CriLJ2542

manual work by prisoners sentenced to labour is recognized part of Jail Administration and discipline as envisaged by Prisons Act, 1894 and the Punjab Jail Manual, as applicable to Himachal Pradesh. To prescribe minimum wages for such labour of … to strike only at certain forms of forced labour leaving it open to the socially or economically powerful sections of the community to exploit the poor and weaker sactions by resorting to other forms of forced labour. … exhaustive wage accounting scheme to the Superintendent, Open Air Jail, Bilaspur on 22-2-1986 for immediate adoption. This fact finds mention in the affidavit of Deputy

P. Kasinathan and ors. Vs. the Chief Secretary to Government of Madras ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1966)2MLJ53

40 F.L.J. 157 : : (1941)1MLJ1 . Reference has also been made to the following enactments, namely, the Prisons Act IX of 1894, Section 3 of the Prisons Act III of 1900, and Madras Regulation II of 1819. … M. Anantanarayanan, J.1. This group of Writ Petitions under Article 226 of the Cons titution for the issue of writs of habeas corpus in the concerned cases, raises questions

Shalik Maruti Kowe (In Jail) Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Its Sec ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

will have to refer to Section 46(4), Section 52 and Section 59(1), (3), (4) and (5) of the Prisons Act, 1894. Section 46(4) reads as under :- œS. 46. Punishment of such offences.” The Superintendent may examine any person touching … this Court being aggrieved by the order dated 19.6.2012 passed by the respondent no.3 and the order dated 22.6.2012 passed by the learned In-charge Principal District and Sessions Judge, Amravati, the petitioner had by way of amendment

Shafi VazruddIn Qureshi Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitions to this Court. 9. In exercise of powers conferred by sub-clause (5) of Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894 the Government of Maharashtra under Notification of the Home Department, dated 8th March, 1962 framed rules namely the … 18 years of actual imprisonment. The Petitioner was directed by the State to be prematurely released after completion 22 years of imprisonment. If remissions are counted then the Petitioner has already completed 22 years. However, since the

N. Bhuvaneswari Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secret ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

prisoners still retain the residue of constitutional rights. 23 "Prison" has been defined in Section 3(1) of the Prisons Act, 1894 as any jail or place used permanently or temporarily under the general or special orders of State Government … (Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the third

Sahebrao Tukaram Juware (Convict) Vs. State of Maharashtra and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 51B; Prison (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 - Rules 4(4), 19, 22, 22(1) and 22(2)

Reported in : 2008CriLJ134

breach of any of the conditions of parole are liable to be punished under Section 51-B of the Prisons Act, 1894, as applicable to the State of Bombay.(2) The District Superintendent of Police concerned or the Commissioner of Police, … Pregnant woman prisoner for delivery (except high security risk of the petitioner).4. For any other sufficient cause.8. Rule 22 of the 1959 Rules deals with the procedure required to be followed by the Authority after receipt of

State of Karnataka vs Smt. Pavithra Gowda

Court : Karnataka

that governs or regulates food in the prison. The enactments that are required to be noticed are the Prisons Act, 1894 (‘the 1894 Act’ for short); Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963; Karnataka Prisons Rules, 1974; and Karnataka Prisons and Correctional … TO ASSIST THE COURT) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 528 OF BNSS, 2023/READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO QUASH / SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED … SPL.PP TO ASSIST THE COURT) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 528 OF BNSS, 2023/READ WITH

HusseIn Khan Mohamed Khan Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1980)82BOMLR262

and sentenced to imprisonment shall be deemed to be a convicted criminal prisoner within the meaning of the Prisons Act, 1894, and shall be governed by the provisions of that Act and the rules made thereunder during the term … (2) - Maintenance of Internal Security (Maharashtra Conditions of Detention) Order, 1971, Clause 37--Prisons Act (IX of of 1894), Section 3(2), (3)--When does the custody of a security prisoner gets itself converted into that of a convicted criminal … 1976. He continued to be so' detained under that Act till February 22, 1977 when he was released from the MISA detention.7. The petitioner filed

Asha Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

General of Prisons under Section 29 extracted above.” 28. Thereafter, the Court referred to Section 26 of the Prisons Act, 1894 and Sections 167 and 309 of the CrPC and adverted to the nature of power exercisable by the … 27 Arms Act | |15 |Muffasil PS; 131/06; |189/353/506 IPC | | |17.06.06 | | |16 |Muffasil PS; 225/11; |353/504/506/34 IPC | | |12.07.11 | | |17 |Siwan Town; 229/05; |341/302/307/34 IPC | | |25.10.05 | |

Ramchandra Raghu Naik Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 - Rules 1 and 2II; Prison (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 - Rules 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 4(10), 9 and 18; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 48A; Constitution of India - Articles 20(2), 226 and 227

Reported in : 2005(3)MhLj933

applications for furlough leave by applying Rule 4(10) of the Furlough Rules.12. Referring to Section 48A of the Prisons Act, 1894, it was sought to be contended that the petitioners having been already punished under the said provision of … Rules comprise of various Chapters and Chapter XVII thereof deals with the subject of writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The Rule 1 of Chapter XVII provides that:--'1. (i) Applications far