Advanced Search Results
Bhanudas Krishna Gawde Vs. K.G. Paranjape and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-01-1975
Criminal
1976CriLJ534
or civil prisoners in accordance with the rules contained in the Jail Manual or rules made under the prisons Act. 1894, and in conformity with that Act; and (c) requiring the respondents not to put the detenu in solitary … were Clauses 9 (iii). 10, 12 (ii) and (xi). 15, 19. 20, 21, 23, 24 and 31. It may be clarified that in the present … then served with a detention order dated the 19th of December. 1974. made by the first respondent under Section 3 (1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Haryana Vs. Mahender Singh and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-02-2007
Constitution
Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 59(5); State Reorganisation Act; West Bengal Correctional Services Act, 1992 - Sections 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 401; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 54 and 55; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20(1), 21, 32, 72 and 161; West Bengal Jail Code; Prisons Rules - Rules 2, 20 and 21; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment) Act, 1978 - Sections 432, 433 and 433A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 433A
2008CriLJ444; 2007(12)SCALE669; 2007AIRSCW6988
had been dismissed. 3. The State of Punjab in exercise of its power conferred upon it under the Prisons Act, 1894 made rules. They have statutory force. Sub-rules (a), (b), (c), (d) and (f) of Rule 2 read as … the Superintendent shall report accordingly to the Local Government with a view to the passing of orders under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898.21. Save as provided by rule 20, when a prisoner has
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-30-1978
Constitution
Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 29, 30, 30(2), 45, 46, 46(6), 46(7) 46(8), 46(10), 47, 50, 56, 57, 59, 60 and 66; Maintenance of Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) to (6), 20, 20(2), 21, 32, 39A, 42, 72, 132, 134, 136, 161 and 217 - ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1898 - Sections 366, 366(1), 366(2) 395, 401, 415, 433, 434 and 435; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53, 63, 73, 74, 303 and 379; Punjab Jail Rules; Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1971; Larceny Act, 1861
AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557
Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, in the case of Batra) of the … are now lodged, and the Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
R.P. Vaghela Vs. State of Gujarat
Gujarat
Feb-01-2002
Contempt of CourtConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 21, 129, 141, 144 and 215; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 10, 15, 15(2) and 20; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 45; Prisoners (Attendance in Courts) Act, 1955 - Sections 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 49
2002CriLJ3082; (2002)1GLR886
Constitution Bench in Sunil Batra case (supra) negatived the challenge against the constitutionality of Section 56 of the Prisons Act, 1894 which empowered the Jail Superintendent to put a prisoner in irons (which were 'bar-fetters' in that case), when … order of reference dated 11-12-2000 quoted the above reproduced directions of the Supreme Court in Paragraphs 16 to 21 in the case of Citizens for Democracy (supra). It appears that in making the reference to the Larger
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKhaliquz-zaman Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Oct-27-2004
Constitution
Land Acquisition Act - Sections 40(1); Kerala Tax Rules, 1959 - Rule 12; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 9, 13B 54, 54(1), 54(2), 54(3), 56, 86 to 88 and 104; Rajasthan Municipalities Act - Sections 65; Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1947; Constitution of India (74th Amendment) Act, 1992; Uttar Pradesh Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 2001; Rajasthan Nathdwara Temple Act - Sections 16; ;Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 19(1), 19(2), 21, 25, 26, 30 31(2), 243R, 243R(2), 243S 243ZA and 289; ;Punjab Municipal Corporation Act, 1976 - Sections 23; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 124A; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 30(2); Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947; Calcutta Municipality Act - Sections 548; Municipal Laws
2005(1)AWC696; (2005)2UPLBEC1200
In Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (supra) the Supreme Court upheld the validity of Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894, which provides for solitary confinement of a prisoner under sentence of death in a cell and Section 56 … declared invalid on the ground that they were violative of the rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution.33. Similarly, in New India Sugar Mills v. Commissioner of Sales Tax : AIR1963SC1207 , a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Challa Ramkrishna Reddy and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-26-2000
ConstitutionLimitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 2, 72 and 113; Constitution of India - Articles 19 and 21; Madras Prison Rules - Rules 48; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Prisoners Act, 1871; Crown Proceedings Act, 1947; Law Reform (Contributory) Negligence Act, 1945
II(2000)ACC18; 2001ACJ1014; JT2000(6)SC334; 2000(4)SCALE471b; (2000)5SCC712; 2000(2)LC1267(SC)
law, prisoners still retain the residue of constitutional rights.23. 'Prison' has been defined in Section 3(1) of the Prisons Act, 1894 as any jail or place used permanently or temporarily under the general or special orders of State Government … dismiss the appeal on that ground. It went a step further and considered the provisions contained in Article 21 of the Constitution and came to the conclusion that since the Right to Life was part of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGauri Shanker and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Aug-25-2004
ServiceConstitution
Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 25, 25(1) and 25A; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 311
2005(1)AWC426
In Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (Supra) the Supreme Court upheld the validity off Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894, which provides for solitary confinement of a prisoner under sentence of death in a cell and Section 56 … declared invalid on the ground that they were violative of the rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution.30. Similarly, in New India Sugar Mills v. Commissioner of Sales Tax : AIR1963SC1207 , a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubhash Hiralal Bhosale Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another
Mumbai
Sep-04-2013
Education
objects, the parole and furlough rules are framed in exercise of powers under Ss.59(5) and 28 of the Prisons Act, 1894. Section 3 defines various terms in the Act and Cls. (5A) and (5B) of S.3 define furlough system and … Station for offences punishable under section 376(2), 366, 342, 506(II) read with 120(B) of Indian Penal Code. On 21st October he was convicted and sentenced to suffer life imprisonment by the Sessions Court, Pune. He preferred an
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMeharraj Vs. 1)The State of Tamil Nadu,
Chennai
Sep-08-2014
Miscellaneous
interview facility was stopped for a period of three months as prison punishment, under Section 46 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (Central Act IX of 1594). He also submitted that only a minor punishment was awarded for his serious … cause to be kept a punishment-book for the entry of the punishments inflicted on prisoners for prison offences.49. Section 21 deals with duties of gate-keepers, which as follows:- ?.The officer acting as gate-keeper, or any other officer of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Manohar Rao Vs. Govt. of A.P. and Others
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-08-1998
ConstitutionCriminal
Andhra Pradesh Prisons Rules, 1979 - Sections 59(5) - Rules 8, 318, 320, 321, 324(A)(B), 326 and 351; Prisons Act, 1894 -; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32, 72 and 161; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 401, 432 and 433-A; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Protection of Civil Rights Act, 1955; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 55
1999(1)ALD214; 1999(1)ALT316; 1999CriLJ1551
Rules are made in exercise of the power conferred on the State Government under Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894. Apart from the fact the very Rules expressly declare that they are made in exercise of the power … Advisory Boards; hence there is a dereliction of the statutory duty and which dereliction offends Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution, by which Fundamental Rights are guaranteed under the Constitution.7. Counter-affidavits are filed by the respondents
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »