Advanced Search Results

Ramchandra Raghu Naik Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 - Rules 1 and 2II; Prison (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 - Rules 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 4(10), 9 and 18; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 48A; Constitution of India - Articles 20(2), 226 and 227

Reported in : 2005(3)MhLj933

applications for furlough leave by applying Rule 4(10) of the Furlough Rules.12. Referring to Section 48A of the Prisons Act, 1894, it was sought to be contended that the petitioners having been already punished under the said provision of … Bombay, be heard and disposed of by a Division Bench to be appointed by the Chief Justice....'Further, Rule 18 of the said Chapter deals with the powers of the single Judge to deal with the writ petitions

HusseIn Khan Mohamed Khan Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1980)82BOMLR262

and sentenced to imprisonment shall be deemed to be a convicted criminal prisoner within the meaning of the Prisons Act, 1894, and shall be governed by the provisions of that Act and the rules made thereunder during the term … (2) - Maintenance of Internal Security (Maharashtra Conditions of Detention) Order, 1971, Clause 37--Prisons Act (IX of of 1894), Section 3(2), (3)--When does the custody of a security prisoner gets itself converted into that of a convicted criminal … No. 2380 of 1973, decided by Chandurkar and Shah JJ., on August 18/19, 1976 (Unrep.) and the view expressed by the division Bench which passed

S. Sant Singh @ Pilli Singh Vs. Secretary, Home Department, Government ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 51B, 59; Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 - Rules 8(5), 10,11, 12 and 18 to 28; Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) (Amendment) Rules, 1989 - Rule 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 389, 389(1), 401, 426, 432 and 433

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1515; 2006(2)MhLj422

to convicted persons. In exercise of powers conferred by clauses (5) and (28) of Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (IX of 1894), in its application to the State of then Bombay, the Government of then Bombay framed … persons. In exercise of powers conferred by clauses (5) and (28) of Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (IX of 1894), in its application to the State of then Bombay, the Government of then Bombay framed

Kishna Vs. State of Raj. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Prisons Act 1894 - Sections 59; Rajasthan Prisoners Open Air Camp Rules, 1972 - Rules 3, 7, 8, 9 and 10

Reported in : [2005(105)FLR616]; RLW2006(2)Raj898

counsel for the parties.6. In exercise of the powers conferred by Clause (18) of Section 59 of the Prisons Act 1894, the State of Rajasthan enacted 1972 Rules for sending convicts to open Air Camps with a view to

Vemula Prabhakar and ors. Vs. Land Acquisition Officer and Revenue Div ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 2, 11, 12, 18, 23, 26, 26(2), 28, 28A, 31, 31(1), 32, 32(8), 46-B and 53; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1985; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2(2) and 55 - Order 21, Rules 30 and 37 - Order 41; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 31-A, 203, 226 and 300A; Income Tax Act

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD200; 2002(1)ALT322

the amount enhanced by the civil court in a reference made under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ('the Act' for brevity) is the question which has been referred by a learned Judge of this Court … to discharge the decree, a power vests in the Civil Court to detain the judgment debtor in civil prison till the decree is discharged. But, in the instant case, against a Governmental decree, who is to be

Asha Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

General of Prisons under Section 29 extracted above.” 28. Thereafter, the Court referred to Section 26 of the Prisons Act, 1894 and Sections 167 and 309 of the CrPC and adverted to the nature of power exercisable by the … direction of the High Court of Patna, the charges under the aforesaid Sections were added vide order dated 18.04.2014. During the litigation, the petitioner’s third son, Rajeev Roshan, a material eye witness in the said case was

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 29, 30, 30(2), 45, 46, 46(6), 46(7) 46(8), 46(10), 47, 50, 56, 57, 59, 60 and 66; Maintenance of Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) to (6), 20, 20(2), 21, 32, 39A, 42, 72, 132, 134, 136, 161 and 217 - ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1898 - Sections 366, 366(1), 366(2) 395, 401, 415, 433, 434 and 435; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53, 63, 73, 74, 303 and 379; Punjab Jail Rules; Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1971; Larceny Act, 1861

Reported in : AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557

Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, in the case of Batra) of the … are now lodged, and the Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, … as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, in

Devpuri Hirapuri Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 161; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20(2) and 32(A); Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3(1) and 59; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 27, 33, 432, 433, 434 and 462

Reported in : (1999)3GLR880

contained in Bombay Jail Manual have been framed pursuant to the power conferred under Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894. Section 59 would read as under;'59. Power to make rules.___(1) The State Government may, by notification in the Official … to Paras (Rule) 1482 and 1485 of Bombay Jail Manual and a decision rendered by this Court on 18th August 1999 in Special Criminal Application No. 441 of 1998 (Coram: N.N. Mathur, J., as he then was).

Azim Shah and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1982CriLJ1135

(1973 Jab LJ 451) has observed thus :Rule 2(h) of the rules framed Under Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894, only saya that for the purposes of the rules framed under the Act, a sentence of imprisonment for … and/or 698 made in exercise of powers conferred by Section 50 of the Prisons Act No. IX of 1894, known as Jail Manual and in the manner indicatled therein.4. It is not in dispute between the parties

Suo Motu Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 389; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 6, 7, 13, 14, 18, 22, 24(2), 24(3), 26, 37, 38, 39 and 59; Prisoners Act, 1900 - Sections 29(1); Gujarat [Removal of Prisoners] Order, 1976; Prisoners Rules, 1973; Prison Regulations; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2088

case, we may first of all turn our attention to certain relevant provisions of the prison legislations.7.2. The Prisons Act, 1894 provides for appointment of officers of prisons including Medical Officer. Section 6 reads as under :-'6. Officers of … may first of all turn our attention to certain relevant provisions of the prison legislations.7.2. The Prisons Act, 1894 provides for appointment of officers of prisons including Medical Officer. Section 6 reads as under :-'6. Officers of