Advanced Search Results

Shafi VazruddIn Qureshi Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

punishment (including permanent removal from the remission system)”. In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 11 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (IX of 1894) and of all other powers enabling in this behalf, the … petitions to this Court. 9. In exercise of powers conferred by sub-clause (5) of Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894 the Government of Maharashtra under Notification of the Home Department, dated 8th March, 1962 framed rules namely the

Santosh BhagwandIn Bachharaj Vs. Superintendent, Central Prison

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rule, 1959 - Rule 4(10); Statutory Rules - Rule 2

Reported in : 2003(4)MhLj349

dated 2nd July, 1964 in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 11 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (IX of 1894).8. It is also pertinent to note that In-charge Superintendent of Police, Yavatmal had submitted his

Kashinath Laxman Ingley Vs. State of Maharashtra Through the Secretary ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)48; 2003BomCR(Cri)1387; (2003)105BOMLR832

days, the Jail Authorities in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 11 of the Prisons Act, 1894, awarded punishment and deducted 250 days from earned remission.4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the

R.P. Vaghela Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Contempt of CourtConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 129, 141, 144 and 215; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 10, 15, 15(2) and 20; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 45; Prisoners (Attendance in Courts) Act, 1955 - Sections 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 49

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3082; (2002)1GLR886

Constitution Bench in Sunil Batra case (supra) negatived the challenge against the constitutionality of Section 56 of the Prisons Act, 1894 which empowered the Jail Superintendent to put a prisoner in irons (which were 'bar-fetters' in that case), when … a Division Bench of this Court by order passed in Miscellaneous Criminal Application No. 6752 of 2000 on 11-12-2000. The main question that requires decision is whether High Court can take cognizance of contempt proceedings in this

Bhanudas Krishna Gawde Vs. K.G. Paranjape and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1976CriLJ534

or civil prisoners in accordance with the rules contained in the Jail Manual or rules made under the prisons Act. 1894, and in conformity with that Act; and (c) requiring the respondents not to put the detenu in solitary … then served with a detention order dated the 19th of December. 1974. made by the first respondent under Section 3 (1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to … of the State of Madhya Pra. v. Bharat Singh AIR 1967 SC 1170 it was stated by Shah, J,. speaking on behalf of the Court,

Sharad Devaram Shelake Vs. The State of Maharashtra (Home Ministry)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

objects, the parole and furlough rules are framed in exercise of powers under Ss.59(5) and 28 of the Prisons Act, 1894. Section 3 defines various terms in the Act and Cls. (5A) and (5B) of S.3 define furlough system and … By this Notification, Rule 4 of the Furlough and Parole Rules was amended and after sub-rule (10), sub-rule 11 to 19 were added. 3. The petitioner was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune under Sections

S. Sant Singh @ Pilli Singh Vs. Secretary, Home Department, Government ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 51B, 59; Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 - Rules 8(5), 10,11, 12 and 18 to 28; Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) (Amendment) Rules, 1989 - Rule 19; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 389, 389(1), 401, 426, 432 and 433

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1515; 2006(2)MhLj422

to convicted persons. In exercise of powers conferred by clauses (5) and (28) of Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (IX of 1894), in its application to the State of then Bombay, the Government of then Bombay framed

Devpuri Hirapuri Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : NarcoticsCriminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 161; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20(2) and 32(A); Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3(1) and 59; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 27, 33, 432, 433, 434 and 462

Reported in : (1999)3GLR880

contained in Bombay Jail Manual have been framed pursuant to the power conferred under Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894. Section 59 would read as under;'59. Power to make rules.___(1) The State Government may, by notification in the Official … while setting aside the order Annexure `A' rendered by the Government of Gujarat, through its Home Department on 11th May 1999 rejecting his application for such premature release. Short ground, on which the petitioner seeks premature release,

U.L. Telgaonkar Vs. The State of Maharashtra Through Secretary and Oth ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : MRTP

referred them to the Civil Hospital, Beed. The learned counsel invited our attention to section 24(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894 and would submit that, every criminal prisoner shall also, as soon as possible after admission, be examined under … has produced certain medical papers of convict from Government Medical College, Aurangabad. He has also reported that, on 11/04/2013, convict was referred by the District Hospital, Beed to the Medical College, Aurangabad. The convict was shifted from

Smt. Sudha Gupta and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101; Prisons Act, 1894; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 336, 337, 353 and 427; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 2; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Sections 141; Constitution of India - Article 226; Madhya Pradesh Prison Rules 1968 - Rules 1, 13 and 14

Reported in : 1999CriLJ1742

could not be controlled despite the requisite treatment.52. It may be noticed that the provisions contained in the Prisons Act 1894 read with the provision's contained in the Madhya Pradesh Prison Rules 1968 amply secure the supply of the … alleged that Vinod Kumar Gupta, the deceased, had been arrested by the police for having committed offences under Sections 353, 336, 337 and 427, IPC for breaking the windscreen of Fire-brigade vehicle No. CPM/ 7924 by pelting … he was found gasping. This situation continued even at 10.00 p.m. At 11.00 p.m. however the pulse and blood pressure went down and were not