Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: prisons act 1894 schedule i · Page 1 of about 74 results (0.037 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 26 2000

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Challa Ramkrishna Reddy and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-26-2000

Subject : ConstitutionLimitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 2, 72 and 113; Constitution of India - Articles 19 and 21; Madras Prison Rules - Rules 48; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Prisoners Act, 1871; Crown Proceedings Act, 1947; Law Reform (Contributory) Negligence Act, 1945

Reported in : II(2000)ACC18; 2001ACJ1014; JT2000(6)SC334; 2000(4)SCALE471b; (2000)5SCC712; 2000(2)LC1267(SC)

law, prisoners still retain the residue of constitutional rights.23. 'Prison' has been defined in Section 3(1) of the Prisons Act, 1894 as any jail or place used permanently or temporarily under the general or special orders of State Government … Three When the which no period years. right of limitation to sue is provided accrues. elsewhere in this Schedule. _______________________________________________________9. These Articles, namely, Article 72 and 113 are applicable to different situations. In order to attract Article

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1965

P. Kasinathan and ors. Vs. the Chief Secretary to Government of Madras ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-13-1965

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1966)2MLJ53

40 F.L.J. 157 : : (1941)1MLJ1 . Reference has also been made to the following enactments, namely, the Prisons Act IX of 1894, Section 3 of the Prisons Act III of 1900, and Madras Regulation II of 1819. … an essential legislative power. This is shown by the following features of the Constitution itself. In the Seventh Schedule, List I, item 9, we have the entry 'Preventive detention for reasons connected with Defence, Foreign Affairs, or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2000

Bobby Alias Premveer and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-16-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisoners Act, 1900 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(3), 3(4), 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10; Prisons Act, 1894; Prisoners Act, 1871; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1882; Prisoners' Testimony Act, 1869; Prisoners Act, 1920; Prisoners (Amendment) Act, 1950; Prisoners (Attendance in Courts) Act, 1955 - Sections 3 to 8, 9 and 43; Police Act; Uttar Pradesh Prisoners Release on Probation Act, 1938; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 67; Evidence Act - Sections 25, 26 and 27; Customs Act - Sections 104; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 35(1); Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 41, 48, 54, 73, 107, 133, 145, 155, 156, 157 to 176, 190, 204, 210, 257 to 271, 428, 475, 476 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections

Reported in : 2000CriLJ4125

required by some law to direct release of person detained, the detention through the warrant will continue.2. The Prisons Act, 1894.15. This law was passed (Act No. 9 of 1894) because it was thought expedient to amend the … DECISION BY THE DIVISION BENCH 'WHETHER AN ORDER Under Section 257 Cr.P.C. IN FORM No. 35 OF SECOND SCHEDULE OF Cr.P.C. CAN BE ISSUED ON THE REQUEST OF THE POLICE DURING INVESTIGATION OF SOME OFFENCE, EVEN IF

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 04 2026

State of Karnataka vs Smt. Pavithra Gowda

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-04-2026

that governs or regulates food in the prison. The enactments that are required to be noticed are the Prisons Act, 1894 (‘the 1894 Act’ for short); Karnataka Prisons Act, 1963; Karnataka Prisons Rules, 1974; and Karnataka Prisons and Correctional … the prisoner is committed and, therefore, there is no substance in the contention that fixation of such time schedule and routine for taking meals is violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.”The High Court of Gujarat in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1998

State of Gujarat and Anr. Vs. Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-24-1998

Subject : Labour and IndustrialConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 4, 17, 18, 21, 23, 24 and 300A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 53, 55, 60, 148, 149, 325 and 374; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 5, 12 and 59; Minimum Wages (Central) Rules; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 357; Kerala Prison Rules - Rule 384; Travancore-Cochin Prisons Act, 1950; Uniform Crime Victims Reparation Act

Reported in : AIR1998SC3164; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)691; 1998CriLJ4561; 1998(4)Crimes12(SC); (1999)1GLR141; JT1998(6)SC530; 1998(5)SCALE410; (1998)7SCC392; [1998]Supp2SCR31; 1999(1)LC714(SC)

the prisoners have no right to claim wages at all except those provided under the provisions of the Prisons Act, 1894 and the rules made thereunder and non-payment of wages to prisoners undergoing sentence of imprisonment with hard labour … Section 5 of the MW Act provides that in fixing minimum rates of wages in respect of the scheduled employment for the first time or in revising such rates the government shall appoint committees to hold enquiries

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2017

Asha Ranjan Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-15-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

General of Prisons under Section 29 extracted above.” 28. Thereafter, the Court referred to Section 26 of the Prisons Act, 1894 and Sections 167 and 309 of the CrPC and adverted to the nature of power exercisable by the … the inter- State transfer of prisoners between the States in Parts A, C and D of the First Schedule to the Constitution. There was no provision, however, either in the Prisoners Act, 1900 or any other law

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 11 1980

Maru Ram and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-11-1980

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 55, 57, 59, 59(5), 59(27), 121, 132, 295, 302, 303, 396, 401, 432 and 433; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 1(2), 5, 57, 401, 432, 432(1), 433, and 433-A; Constitution of India -Article 32;

Reported in : AIR1980SC2147; 1980CriLJ1440; (1981)1SCC107; [1981]1SCR1196

The rules of remission and release were common tor all prisoners, and most States had rules under the Prisons Act, 1894 or some had separate Acts providing for shortening of sentences or variants thereof, which enabled the life-sentencee, regardless … the contention of competency as of little substance. It is trite law that the Lists in the Seventh Schedule broadly delineate the rubrics of legislation and must be interpreted liberally. Article 246(2) gives power to Parliament to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 14 1991

Gurdev Singh and ors. Etc. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors. Overruled

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-14-1991

Subject : CriminalLabour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 23, 43 and 226; ;Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 33 and 35; ;Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 22; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Section 53

Reported in : AIR1992HP70,1992CriLJ2542

manual work by prisoners sentenced to labour is recognized part of Jail Administration and discipline as envisaged by Prisons Act, 1894 and the Punjab Jail Manual, as applicable to Himachal Pradesh. To prescribe minimum wages for such labour of … money by the 10th or so of each month and in case they fail to adhere to the schedule, they are reminded immediately. When the money of wages of all prisoners is received from all the contractors,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2004

Gauri Shanker and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-25-2004

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj Act, 1947 - Sections 25, 25(1) and 25A; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 311

Reported in : 2005(1)AWC426

In Sunil Batra v. Delhi Administration (Supra) the Supreme Court upheld the validity off Section 30(2) of the Prisons Act, 1894, which provides for solitary confinement of a prisoner under sentence of death in a cell and Section 56 … justice as may be entrusted to them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Eleventh Schedule.'5. By Government order dated 24.4.1999, copy of which is Annexure-2 to the special appeal, the employees of certain

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1965

P. Kasinathan and ors. Vs. Chief Secretary to Govt. of Madras and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-13-1965

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 22, 226, 352, 358, 359 and 359(1) ; Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 30(1) and 30(4); Defence of India Act, 1962 - Sections 3(2) 3(13) and 44

Reported in : AIR1967Mad21

authority is Subrahmanyan v. Muttuswamy Goundan . Reference has been also made to the following enactments, namely, the Prisons Act IX of 1894, S. 3 of the Prisoners Act III of 1900, and Madras Regulation II of 1819. … an essential legislative power. This is shown by the following features of the Constitution itself. In the VII Schedule, List I, item 9, we have the entry 'Preventive detention for reasons connected with Defence, Foreign Affairs, or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial