Advanced Search Results

Santosh BhagwandIn Bachharaj Vs. Superintendent, Central Prison

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rule, 1959 - Rule 4(10); Statutory Rules - Rule 2

Reported in : 2003(4)MhLj349

dated 2nd July, 1964 in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 11 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (IX of 1894).8. It is also pertinent to note that In-charge Superintendent of Police, Yavatmal had submitted his … then there could be no reason for such a power not to be specified under the provisions of Chapter XII of the Code. In terms of Section 41, a police officer may arrest a person without a warrant

Ramchandra Raghu Naik Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 - Rules 1 and 2II; Prison (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 - Rules 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 4(10), 9 and 18; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 48A; Constitution of India - Articles 20(2), 226 and 227

Reported in : 2005(3)MhLj933

applications for furlough leave by applying Rule 4(10) of the Furlough Rules.12. Referring to Section 48A of the Prisons Act, 1894, it was sought to be contended that the petitioners having been already punished under the said provision of … then there could be no reason for such a power not to be specified under the provisions of Chapter XII of the Code. In terms of Section 41, a police officer may arrest a person without a warrant

Bans NaraIn Yadav Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 10, 59(1) and 59(28); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 16

Reported in : AIR1977All6

but without any order as to costs. Service - prison rules - Sections 10 and 59 (28) of Prisons Act, 1894 and Rule 1135 of Chapter XII of Jail Manual U.P. - Rule provides power to Government to make

Meharraj Vs. 1)The State of Tamil Nadu,

Court : Chennai

Subject : Miscellaneous

interview facility was stopped for a period of three months as prison punishment, under Section 46 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (Central Act IX of 1594). He also submitted that only a minor punishment was awarded for his serious … effective control over the prisoners, in the prisons. They are responsible for the internal management of the prison.47. Chapter II deals of the Prisons Act, 1984, deals with maintenance of officers of Prisons. Sections 4 and 5 … Volume-II.22. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor further submitted that on 03.04.2014 at about 12.00 Hours, husband of the petitioner and three other remand prisoners instigated communal

Aniruddhsinh Mahipatsinh Jadeja Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21; Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 - Rules 18(2) and 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - 268(1)

Reported in : (2002)1GLR594

the prisoner's sentence.XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX The experience has shown that the system has worked satisfactorily. The Prisons Act, 1894 does not specifically provide for the grant of furlough and the remission of sentence consequent upon it. In … no compelling circumstances which justify the order under Section 268(1) of the Cr.P.C. He also submitted that mobile chapter, when the petitioner was produced before the C. J. M., at Rajkot has been highlighted by the State … in 1987 (2) GLR 1178 (FB) and the relevant observations in Paras 12, 13 and 14 are quoted as under :-'12. In view of the

Shafi VazruddIn Qureshi Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretar ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitions to this Court. 9. In exercise of powers conferred by sub-clause (5) of Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894 the Government of Maharashtra under Notification of the Home Department, dated 8th March, 1962 framed rules namely the … to wear uniform for convict and instead wore civil dress. The Petitioner was proceeded under Rule 5(iv) in chapter 27 of the Maharashtra Prison Manual for his blameworthy conduct and his case has been categorized under 22 … had also received the prison punishments for misbehaving with jail staff. On 12-11-2008, he had refused to wear uniform for convict and instead wore civil

Tmt. Rohini Lingam Vs. State Represented by the Secretary to Governmen ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 302, 307, 332, 324, 342 and 448; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1); Indian Explosive Substances Act - Sections 56; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3(1), 4, 19, 20, 59 and 59(8); Prisoners' Act, 1900; Tamil Nadu Prison Rules, 1983 - Rules 1, 32, 34, 44 and 71; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1882 - Sections 541; Constitution of India - Articles 9(5), 21, 32 and 226

Reported in : (2008)5MLJ822

to (26) of the prisons Act, 1894, the Government has framed various rules. As per Rule 1 of Chapter 1 which speaks about classes of prisoners who may be confined in subsidiary jails, it is stated as … is also relevant to find out some more factual aspects and provisions of the relevant statutes. Under the Prisons Act, 1894 the term 'prison' is defined under Section 3(1), which is as follows:Section 3(1) 'Prison' means any jail or … under various provisions as stated above. The Sessions Judge, Kanniyakumari has convicted 12 accused out of 24 in S.C. No. 157/98. Therefore, the respondent cannot

Shobha Anil Londase Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19 and 21

Reported in : 2003(2)ALD(Cri)122

that the members of the jail staff would be liable to be prosecuted under section 54(1) of the Prisons Act, 1894 if any offences under section 42 of the Prisons Act relating to the introduction of or supply to … were in the course of the wrestling game and not intentionally inflicted upon. According to Rule 12(i) of Chapter XIX of Prison Manual, the prisoners are to be encourage to play such games as can be suitably … provisions of law relevant for the decision.9. The Rule 11 of Chapter XIII of the Jail Manual deals with the necessity of celebrating National festivals

R.P. Vaghela Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Contempt of CourtConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 129, 141, 144 and 215; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 10, 15, 15(2) and 20; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 45; Prisoners (Attendance in Courts) Act, 1955 - Sections 5; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 49

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3082; (2002)1GLR886

Constitution Bench in Sunil Batra case (supra) negatived the challenge against the constitutionality of Section 56 of the Prisons Act, 1894 which empowered the Jail Superintendent to put a prisoner in irons (which were 'bar-fetters' in that case), when

Sendhaji Mathurji and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1981)22GLR451

imprisonment for life awarded to them under Section 302, Indian Penal Code. They have earned remissions under the Prisons Act, 1894, and the Bombay Rules made thereunder. They contend that even though each one of them has served jail … as remissions are concerned, our attention has been invited to the Prisons Act, 1894. It runs into several Chapters none of which contains any provision relevant for the purpose of the present case except Section 59. Section