Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: prisons act 1894 chapter i · Page 1 of about 137 results (0.014 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 19 2003

Santosh BhagwandIn Bachharaj Vs. Superintendent, Central Prison

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-19-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rule, 1959 - Rule 4(10); Statutory Rules - Rule 2

Reported in : 2003(4)MhLj349

dated 2nd July, 1964 in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 11 of the Prisons Act, 1894 (IX of 1894).8. It is also pertinent to note that In-charge Superintendent of Police, Yavatmal had submitted his … that the application has been rejected as per the provision contained in Sub-rule (10) of Rule 4 of Chapter 37 of The Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. Sub-rule (10) of Rule 4 contemplates that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2005

Ramchandra Raghu Naik Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-25-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 - Rules 1 and 2II; Prison (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 - Rules 3, 3(1), 3(2), 4, 4(10), 9 and 18; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 48A; Constitution of India - Articles 20(2), 226 and 227

Reported in : 2005(3)MhLj933

applications for furlough leave by applying Rule 4(10) of the Furlough Rules.12. Referring to Section 48A of the Prisons Act, 1894, it was sought to be contended that the petitioners having been already punished under the said provision of … said clause.6. In fact, the said clause cannot be read ignoring the main portion of Rule 2 of Chapter I of the said Rules. The same reads that:--'2. Matters disposed of by a single Judge. -- Save as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 15 2013

Shafi VazruddIn Qureshi Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through the Secretar ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-15-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitions to this Court. 9. In exercise of powers conferred by sub-clause (5) of Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894 the Government of Maharashtra under Notification of the Home Department, dated 8th March, 1962 framed rules namely the … to wear uniform for convict and instead wore civil dress. The Petitioner was proceeded under Rule 5(iv) in chapter 27 of the Maharashtra Prison Manual for his blameworthy conduct and his case has been categorized under 22

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 26 1981

Azim Shah and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-26-1981

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1982CriLJ1135

(1973 Jab LJ 451) has observed thus :Rule 2(h) of the rules framed Under Section 59 of the Prisons Act, 1894, only saya that for the purposes of the rules framed under the Act, a sentence of imprisonment for … 358, which is placed in Part IV (Admission, Custody, Employment, Dieting, Treatment and Release of Prisoners) placed in Chapter II, reads as under :R. 358. - (1) When a prisoner has been sentenced to imprisonment for life

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 2000

Bobby Alias Premveer and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-16-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisoners Act, 1900 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(3), 3(4), 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10; Prisons Act, 1894; Prisoners Act, 1871; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1882; Prisoners' Testimony Act, 1869; Prisoners Act, 1920; Prisoners (Amendment) Act, 1950; Prisoners (Attendance in Courts) Act, 1955 - Sections 3 to 8, 9 and 43; Police Act; Uttar Pradesh Prisoners Release on Probation Act, 1938; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 67; Evidence Act - Sections 25, 26 and 27; Customs Act - Sections 104; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 35(1); Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 41, 48, 54, 73, 107, 133, 145, 155, 156, 157 to 176, 190, 204, 210, 257 to 271, 428, 475, 476 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections

Reported in : 2000CriLJ4125

required by some law to direct release of person detained, the detention through the warrant will continue.2. The Prisons Act, 1894.15. This law was passed (Act No. 9 of 1894) because it was thought expedient to amend the … under sentence of a Court or Court-martial, and includes a person detained in prison under the provisions of Chapter VIII of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1882 or under the Prisoners Act 1871. Inspector General of Prisons

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 30 1978

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-30-1978

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 29, 30, 30(2), 45, 46, 46(6), 46(7) 46(8), 46(10), 47, 50, 56, 57, 59, 60 and 66; Maintenance of Security Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Articles 11, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2) to (6), 20, 20(2), 21, 32, 39A, 42, 72, 132, 134, 136, 161 and 217 - ; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1898 - Sections 366, 366(1), 366(2) 395, 401, 415, 433, 434 and 435; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 53, 63, 73, 74, 303 and 379; Punjab Jail Rules; Supreme Court (Enlargement of Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction) Act, 1971; Larceny Act, 1861

Reported in : AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557

Prison Administration resists judicial action, in intra-mural matters as forbidden ground, relying on Sections 30 and 56 of Prisons Act, 1894 (the Act, hereafter). The Petitioners invoke Articles 14, 21 (and 19, in the case of Batra) of the … on the rope to reach 'the undiscovered country from whose bourn no traveller returns' is a different, dismal chapter. Keeping these spells of suffering separate, we may approach the poignant issues of quasi-solitary confinement and its legality.53.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 24 1998

State of Gujarat and Anr. Vs. Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-24-1998

Subject : Labour and IndustrialConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 4, 17, 18, 21, 23, 24 and 300A; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 53, 55, 60, 148, 149, 325 and 374; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 - Sections 3, 5, 12 and 59; Minimum Wages (Central) Rules; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 357; Kerala Prison Rules - Rule 384; Travancore-Cochin Prisons Act, 1950; Uniform Crime Victims Reparation Act

Reported in : AIR1998SC3164; 1998(2)ALD(Cri)691; 1998CriLJ4561; 1998(4)Crimes12(SC); (1999)1GLR141; JT1998(6)SC530; 1998(5)SCALE410; (1998)7SCC392; [1998]Supp2SCR31; 1999(1)LC714(SC)

the prisoners have no right to claim wages at all except those provided under the provisions of the Prisons Act, 1894 and the rules made thereunder and non-payment of wages to prisoners undergoing sentence of imprisonment with hard labour … prisoners who were sentenced to rigorous imprisonment. Section 53 of the Indian Penal Code which falls under the Chapter entitled 'Of Punishments' vivisects punishments into five categories, of which the category 'imprisonment' has been further sub divided

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 2001

Aniruddhsinh Mahipatsinh Jadeja Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-14-2001

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21; Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959 - Rules 18(2) and 19; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - 268(1)

Reported in : (2002)1GLR594

the prisoner's sentence.XXX XXX XXX XXX XXX The experience has shown that the system has worked satisfactorily. The Prisons Act, 1894 does not specifically provide for the grant of furlough and the remission of sentence consequent upon it. In … no compelling circumstances which justify the order under Section 268(1) of the Cr.P.C. He also submitted that mobile chapter, when the petitioner was produced before the C. J. M., at Rajkot has been highlighted by the State

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 30 2008

Tmt. Rohini Lingam Vs. State Represented by the Secretary to Governmen ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-30-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 148, 302, 307, 332, 324, 342 and 448; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1); Indian Explosive Substances Act - Sections 56; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3(1), 4, 19, 20, 59 and 59(8); Prisoners' Act, 1900; Tamil Nadu Prison Rules, 1983 - Rules 1, 32, 34, 44 and 71; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1882 - Sections 541; Constitution of India - Articles 9(5), 21, 32 and 226

Reported in : (2008)5MLJ822

to (26) of the prisons Act, 1894, the Government has framed various rules. As per Rule 1 of Chapter 1 which speaks about classes of prisoners who may be confined in subsidiary jails, it is stated as … is also relevant to find out some more factual aspects and provisions of the relevant statutes. Under the Prisons Act, 1894 the term 'prison' is defined under Section 3(1), which is as follows:Section 3(1) 'Prison' means any jail or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 09 2003

Amrish Rana Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-09-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21; ;Prisoners Act, 1894 - Section 13

Reported in : 2003CriLJ2991

the State also concur with the suggestions given by Mr. Sharma.14. It is noticed that Chapter-Ill of the Prisons Act, 1894 provides for the duties of the Officers of the Jail including Medical Officers. Section 13 specifically lays down

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial