Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: prisoners act 1900 section 6 · Page 1 of about 211 results (0.036 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 16 2000

Bobby Alias Premveer and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-16-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisoners Act, 1900 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(3), 3(4), 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10; Prisons Act, 1894; Prisoners Act, 1871; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1882; Prisoners' Testimony Act, 1869; Prisoners Act, 1920; Prisoners (Amendment) Act, 1950; Prisoners (Attendance in Courts) Act, 1955 - Sections 3 to 8, 9 and 43; Police Act; Uttar Pradesh Prisoners Release on Probation Act, 1938; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 67; Evidence Act - Sections 25, 26 and 27; Customs Act - Sections 104; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 35(1); Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 41, 48, 54, 73, 107, 133, 145, 155, 156, 157 to 176, 190, 204, 210, 257 to 271, 428, 475, 476 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections

Reported in : 2000CriLJ4125

relating to prisoners confined by order of a Court. It has been provided in Section 3 of the Prisoners Act, 1900 that the Officers-in-charge of prisons can detain persons duly committed to their custody under that Act by any … Section 3 and make it incumbent upon the officer in charge of prison to produce the prisoner. Then Section 6 lays down the condition for the Officer in charge of prison when to abstain from carrying out order.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 24 2005

Ram Sewak Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-24-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Prisoner's Leave Rules, 1989 - Rules 4, 5, 6 and 8; Madhya Pradesh Prisoner's Leave Act, 1900 - Sections 6; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 149 and 302; Madhya Pradesh Prisoners (Amendment) Act, 1985 - Sections 31A; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 46

Reported in : 2005(3)MPHT474

by the Inspector General of Prisons, Bhopal is ultra vires and is contrary to the provisions of the Prisoners Act, 1900 (for short 'the Act') and the Rules. Petitioner contends that the Act and the Rules no where provides … imprisonment by Additional Sessions Judge, Damoh by judgment dated 17-4-1998. He filed an application for first leave under Section 6 of the Madhya Pradesh Prisoner's Leave Rules, 1989 (for short 'the Rules'). That application was allowed. Thereafter the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2009

Mr. Saeed Sohail Sheikh S/O Mr. Sohail Mehmood Sheikh and ors. Etc. Vs ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-21-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : MCOC Act; Prisoners Act, 1900 - Sections 2, 29 and 29(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 57, 167, 167(1), 167(2), 167(5), 173, 344 and 491; Maharashtra Prison Rules - Rules 9 and 12(1); Maharashtra Prison Regulations; Prisoners Removal Order, 1965; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 21

Reported in : 2009(111)BomLR3748; 2009(6)MhLj287

it has been passed in exercise of the power conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 29 of the Prisoners Act, 1900. Under Section 2(c) the 'prisoner' is defined as, 'means a prisoner referred to in Sub-section (1) of Section … to prisoner as defined in Sub-section (1) of Section 29 of the Act. Section 29 is under Part VI of the Prisoners Act, titled 'Removal of Prisoners'. Section 29(1) of the Prisoners Act, 1900 lays down:29. Removal

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 12 2005

Suo Motu Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : May-12-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 389; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 6, 7, 13, 14, 18, 22, 24(2), 24(3), 26, 37, 38, 39 and 59; Prisoners Act, 1900 - Sections 29(1); Gujarat [Removal of Prisoners] Order, 1976; Prisoners Rules, 1973; Prison Regulations; Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : (2005)3GLR2088

of Prisoners] Order, 1976 in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 29 of the Prisoners Act, 1900. Section 3 provides for circumstances for removal. It states that prisoners may be removed from one prison to another … of the prison legislations.7.2. The Prisons Act, 1894 provides for appointment of officers of prisons including Medical Officer. Section 6 reads as under :-'6. Officers of prisons.- For every prison there shall be a Superintendent, a Medical Officer

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2006

Nabbu @ Navab Son of Babu Sakka Vs. State of U.P. Through Secretary, P ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-06-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Arms Act - Sections 25; Gangsters Act - Sections 2 and 3; Prisoners (Attendance in Court) Act, 1955 - Sections 3(2); Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 6; Prisoners Act, 1900 - Sections 55; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 379, 411 and 414; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 3, 41, 102, 167, 267, 267(1) and 269; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2260

it has been observed that:-Prisoners (Attendance in Courts) Act, 1955, Sections 3(2), 6 Prisons Act, 1894, Section 55 Prisoners Act, 1900, Section 3 Criminal P.C., 1973, Sections 267, 269 Construction of-Petitioners detained in Jail at Meerut were directed to be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 31 2007

Kamlesh Gour and Rajju @ Shamim Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-31-2007

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2008(2)MPHT22

considered by the authorities, the orders of rejection passed in both these cases are bad in law.5. The Prisoners Act, 1900 as amended by The Prisoners (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act, 1985, has made provisions in Part VI-A on leave … A.K. Patnaik, C.J.1. The two appeals have been filed under Section 2 (1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Peeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005, against the orders passed … 2(f) of Central Excise Act 1944? Finance Act 932 of 1994), Section 65 (76 b) (as amended on 16.6.2005) - Held, The first limb of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1965

P. Kasinathan and ors. Vs. the Chief Secretary to Government of Madras ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-13-1965

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : (1966)2MLJ53

v. Chanabasappa : AIR1943Bom226 '1');'> : AIR1954All626 . Sri Nambiar has contended that, under Section 3 of the Prisoners Act, 1900, an officer in charge of a prison has authority to receive and detain only persons duly committed to … the law but also with those forms which alone can indicate that the substance has been complied with. 6. We propose, first, to examine the entire legal argument of the attack upon Rule 30(4), either because of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1965

P. Kasinathan and ors. Vs. Chief Secretary to Govt. of Madras and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-13-1965

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 22, 226, 352, 358, 359 and 359(1) ; Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 30(1) and 30(4); Defence of India Act, 1962 - Sections 3(2) 3(13) and 44

Reported in : AIR1967Mad21

and Bijai Bahadur v. State : AIR1954All626 . Sri Nambiar has contended that, under S. 3 of the Prisoners Act, 1900, an officer in charge of a prison has authority to receive and detain only persons duly committed to … of the power of this court to interfere with an order of detention made under S. 3(1) and Section 3(2)(15)(i) of the Defence of India Act, read with Rule 30(1)(b) and Rule 30(4) of the Rules made … Supreme Court that we have earlier specified. In W.P. Nos. 47 and 61 of 1965: : 1966CriLJ586 , persons situated precisely like the present writ

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 1965

P. Kasinathan and ors. Vs. Chief Sectetary to Govt. and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-13-1965

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1967CriLJ85

and Bijai Bahadur v. State : AIR1954All626 . Sri Nambiar has contended that, under Section 3 of the Prisoners Act, 1900, an officer in charge of a prison has authority to receive and detain only persons duly committed to … Punjab : 1964CriLJ217 (2) Anandas Nambir v. Chief Secy. Govt. of Madras, judgment in WP Nos. 47 and 61 of 1965 : : 1966CriLJ586 ; (3) A.K. Gopalan v. Govt. of India New Delhi, Judgment in W.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 10 2003

Barmeshwar Nath Singh @ Mukhiya Jee Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Feb-10-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prisoners Act, 1900 - Sections 29(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 268 and 417

to be set aside.16. In the result, this application is allowed and order impugned as contained in Annexure 6 is quashed. Prisoners Act, 1900 - Section 29(2)--Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973--Sections 268 and 417--Transfer of prisoner--From one … Beur Central Jail, Patna to Central Jail, Bhagalpur in purported exercise of power under Section 29(2) of the Prisoners Act, 1900 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) read with Section 417 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial