Advanced Search Results
The State of Bombay Vs. Shirish V. Pai and ors.
Mumbai
Oct-25-1957
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1952 - Sections 3; Coroners Act, 1871 - Sections 8(2), 9(1), 9(2), 9(4), 13, 14, 14(4), 16, 19(1), 19(3), 20(2), 22, 24, 25, 26, 29 and 38; Prisoners' Act, 1900; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 26; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 193; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 476 and 480
AIR1959Bom6; (1958)60BOMLR822; 1959CriLJ30; ILR1958Bom847
give evidence, the Coroner shall be deemed a Criminal Court within the meaning of Part 9 of the Prisoners' Act, 1900. Section 19, Sub-section (3) provides that for the purpose of Section 26 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, a Coroner … Sub-section (2) provides that the inquest held by the Coroner shall ordinarily be held in the Coroner's Court-house. Section 13 speaks of the Coroner summoning and empanelling a jury. Section 14 refers to the Coroner opening his Court
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSuo Motu Vs. the State of Gujarat
Gujarat
May-12-2005
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 389; Prisons Act, 1894 - Sections 3, 4, 4(1), 6, 7, 13, 14, 18, 22, 24(2), 24(3), 26, 37, 38, 39 and 59; Prisoners Act, 1900 - Sections 29(1); Gujarat [Removal of Prisoners] Order, 1976; Prisoners Rules, 1973; Prison Regulations; Constitution of India - Article 21
(2005)3GLR2088
of Prisoners] Order, 1976 in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 29 of the Prisoners Act, 1900. Section 3 provides for circumstances for removal. It states that prisoners may be removed from one prison to another … Senior Advocate appearing with Mr. SV Raju for the convict prisoner. By our C A V order dated 13th October, 2004 the said application was rejected by assigning detailed reasons, dealing with all the submissions that had
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskP. Kasinathan and ors. Vs. Chief Secretary to Govt. of Madras and anr.
Chennai
Dec-13-1965
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 22, 226, 352, 358, 359 and 359(1) ; Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 30(1) and 30(4); Defence of India Act, 1962 - Sections 3(2) 3(13) and 44
AIR1967Mad21
and Bijai Bahadur v. State : AIR1954All626 . Sri Nambiar has contended that, under S. 3 of the Prisoners Act, 1900, an officer in charge of a prison has authority to receive and detain only persons duly committed to … of the power of this court to interfere with an order of detention made under S. 3(1) and Section 3(2)(15)(i) of the Defence of India Act, read with Rule 30(1)(b) and Rule 30(4) of the Rules made
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
P. Kasinathan and ors. Vs. Chief Sectetary to Govt. and anr.
Chennai
Dec-13-1965
Criminal
1967CriLJ85
and Bijai Bahadur v. State : AIR1954All626 . Sri Nambiar has contended that, under Section 3 of the Prisoners Act, 1900, an officer in charge of a prison has authority to receive and detain only persons duly committed to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe State of Jharkhand & Others versus Vikash Tiwary @ Bikash Tiwa ...
Supreme Court of India
Jan-17-2025
Land Acquisition
[2025]2S.C.R.63
Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Narayan Central Jail, Hazaribagh, to Central Jail, Dumka, within the State of Jharkhand. Headnotes† Prisoners Act, 1900 - s.29 - State Jail Manual, 1925 - Rule 770(b) - The Respondent herein was convicted for offences … Prisons and Correctional Services Act, 2023; Prisons Act, 1894; Penal Code, 1860; Constitution of India. List of Keywords Section 29 of Prisoners Act, 1900; Transfer to another jail; Intra-State transfer request; Prisons; Safety in prisons; Safety of … Court is set aside and the order/memo dated 17.05.2023 stands restored. [Paras 13, 16] Model Prisons and Correctional Services Act, 2023 - Rule 35 -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBobby Alias Premveer and anr. Vs. State of U.P.
Allahabad
Feb-16-2000
Criminal
Prisoners Act, 1900 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(3), 3(4), 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10; Prisons Act, 1894; Prisoners Act, 1871; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1882; Prisoners' Testimony Act, 1869; Prisoners Act, 1920; Prisoners (Amendment) Act, 1950; Prisoners (Attendance in Courts) Act, 1955 - Sections 3 to 8, 9 and 43; Police Act; Uttar Pradesh Prisoners Release on Probation Act, 1938; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 67; Evidence Act - Sections 25, 26 and 27; Customs Act - Sections 104; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act - Sections 35(1); Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 41, 48, 54, 73, 107, 133, 145, 155, 156, 157 to 176, 190, 204, 210, 257 to 271, 428, 475, 476 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections
2000CriLJ4125
relating to prisoners confined by order of a Court. It has been provided in Section 3 of the Prisoners Act, 1900 that the Officers-in-charge of prisons can detain persons duly committed to their custody under that Act by any … and 11 provide for the remission system, convict officers, Revising Boards and release on probation respectively. Chapters 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 talk of classification of prisoners, superior class convicts simple imprisonment convicts, female prisoners
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarishankar and anr. Vs. State of M.P.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-03-2008
Criminal
2008(4)MPHT381
dated 9-10-2006 and R.T. No. 73/07 pending before JMFC, Begumganj under Section 224 of IPC and 31(B) of Prisoners Act 1900 be quashed.2. Applicants case is that, both the applicants were convicted by Second Additional Sessions Judge Begumganj, Raisen … but they did not surrender and applicant Nos. 1 and 2 were arrested respectively on 20-11-1998 and on 13-04-00.3. On 9-1-2006, PSO Begumganj registered Crime No. 286/06 against these applicants under Section 31(B) of Prisoners Act, 1900
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDr. Niranjam Bhattacharjee Vs. Manipur Administration
Guwahati
Feb-24-1958
Criminal
accused but it is not necessary to go into those details, since proceedings, under Section 37 of the Prisoners Act, 1900 under which they appear to have acted were not competent, as-the petitioner was under confinement in a prison … against the petitioner in that case, and some evidence was also recorded, but that case was withdrawn on 13-2-58. An order of acquittal under Section 494(b) Cr. P. Code, was necessary but learned A.D.M. failed to pass
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMeharraj Vs. 1)The State of Tamil Nadu,
Chennai
Sep-08-2014
Miscellaneous
At this juncture, this Court deems it fit to extract the relevant provisions, from the Prisons Act, 1894 Prisoners Act 1900, and the Rules framed thereunder, enabling the prison authorities to have an effective control over the prisoners, in … E.S. Act 1908 Act 54/01, J.M. - 4, Madurai. 6 Vathalagundu P.S.Cr.No:240. 13 u/s 120 (b), 153 (A), 353, 307 IPC7of Arms Act 4 and … Additional Superintendent of Police, Central Prison, Trichy and finding him guilty, for having committed the prison offence, Under Section 45 of the Prison Act, 1894 (Central Act IX of 1894) r/w. Rules 297(8), (ii), (44) and 57
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVikash Tiwary Alias Vikash Nath Tiwary Alias Bikash Tiwary Alias Bikas ...
Jharkhand
Mar-08-2016
Education
and the judicial pronouncement on the subject to test the legality of the impugned orders so passed. The Prisoners Act, 1900 which was enacted to consolidate the law relating to prisoners confined by an order of a court deals … Maharashtra and Others vs. Saeed Sohail Sheikh And Others reported in (2012) 13 SCC192 6. Mr. Suraj Verma, learned A.P.P., in support of the state … connection with Patratu P. S. Case No. 309 of 2014 which was instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code the petitioner was arrested and was lodged at Hazaribagh Central Jail as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »