Advanced Search Results
Kamleshkumar Ishwardas Patel Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Apr-17-1995
Criminal
Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 3 and 11 and 11(1); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 22(4) and (5); Preventive Detention Act, 1950; Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 - Sections 3 and 12
1996(53)ECC123; JT1995(3)SC639; 1995(2)SCALE681; (1995)4SCC51; [1995]3SCR279
Board. (Emphasis supplied).12. All these cases related to orders of detention made by the District Magistrate under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 which specifically provided [in Section 7(1)] that the authority making the order of detention shall afford to the … from those contained in the National Security Act, 1980 as well as earlier preventive detention laws, namely, the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 in some respects. Under subsection (3) of Section 3 of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPralhad Krishna Kurane Vs. the State of Bombay
Mumbai
Jun-11-1951
Criminal
Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 4, 7, 7(1) and 11; Preventive Detention (Amendment) Act, 1951 - Sections 1(3), 2, 3(3), 6, 9, 9(1), 9(2), 10(1), 12 and 12(1); Constitution of India - Articles 20, 20(1) and 226; Bombay Public Security Measures Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(1), 2(4), and 21; Bengal Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1930; West Bengal Security Ordinance, 1949; West Bengal Security Ordinance, 1940; West Bengal Security Ordinance, 1942; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 491
AIR1952Bom1; (1951)53BOMLR717; ILR1952Bom134
and detained in the House of Correction at Byculla under the authority of the order. On 26-2-1950 the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, came into force, and there was consequently passed against, the applicant an order under that Act detaining him … place. The place had to be determined, however, by an order passed under the provisions of Section 4, Preventive Detention Act, 1950, as it stood before the amending Act came into operation and after the amending Aot under tbe provisions
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: A.K. Gopalan
Chennai
Mar-19-1951
Criminal
Prevention Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 3A and 12; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 491; Constitution of India - Articles 53, 154, 162 and 226
AIR1953Mad41; (1952)2MLJ690
his detention, his main contention being that the order passed by the Government under Section 12(2) of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, continuing his detention under the said Act did not specify the period of his detention. After the arguments … and after full consultation with their legal advisers the Government issued a fresh order of detention under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, on 22nd February 1951.'4. After we reserved judgment in this case, in view of certain events which happened
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kuruvilla Abraham Vs. the State of Kerala and anr.
Kerala
Jan-15-1974
Criminal
1975CriLJ1372
AIR 1970 SC 1664 : (1970 Cr LJ 1404) both of which were cases that arose under the Preventive Detention Act. 1950, Section 13 (2) whereof was identically worded as Section 14 (2) of the present Act. The first of … Cri LJ 274) earlier referred to which was a case that arose after Section 13 (2) of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 was amended by Act 61 of 1952. With reference to Section 13 (2) as amended and repelling a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPushkar Mukherjee and 29 ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal
Supreme Court of India
Nov-07-1968
Constitution
Constitution of India Articles 22 and 32; Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 3(1), (2) and 11(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 398; Detention Order
AIR1970SC852; 1970CriLJ852; (1969)1SCC10; [1969]2SCR635
Article 32 of the Constitution directing their release from detention under orders passed under Section 3(2) of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 (Act IV of 1950), hereinafter called the 'Act'. 2. Cause has been shown by Mr. Debabrata Mukherjee and … is necessary so to do; I, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3(2) of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 (Act IV of 1950), I make this order directing that the said Shri Kanta Bose @ Subhas Chandra
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD.M. Revanasiddaiah Vs. State of Mysore
Karnataka
Sep-10-1951
CriminalConstitution
Constitution of India - Articles 22(5) and 226; Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2) and 7; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 491
AIR1952Kant85; AIR1952Mys85
following order: --Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 (IV (4) of 1950) I.K. Seshagiri Rao, District Magistrate, Chitaldrug hereby direct that the said D. M. Revanasiddiah … D.M. Murigiah of Chital-drug residing at Davangere have been detained under Subjection (2) of Section 3 of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 and in pursuance of the provisions of Section 7 of the said Act, you are informed of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSunil S/O Sadashiv Ghate Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Mumbai
Mar-23-2000
Criminal
Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 - Sections 3(2,3), 8, 9, 10 12, 13 and 14; Constitution of India - Article 22(5); Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 21; National Security Act, 1980 - Sections 8(1) and 14; COFEPOSA Act - Sections 3 and 11; PIT NDPS Act - Sections 3 and 12; Prevention Detention Act, 1950; Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971; General Clauses Act, 1897
2000(5)BomCR827; 2000BomCR(Cri)827; 2000CriLJ3709; 2000(4)MhLj386
Act with those of the National Security Act, 1980 as well as earlier preventive detention laws, namely, the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 and the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971, observed in paras 18 to 22 as under:---' 18. Section … from those contained in the National Security Act, 1980 as well as earlier preventive detention laws, namely, the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 and the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, 1971 in some respects. Under sub-section (3) of section 3 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHubbalal and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Bharat
Madhya Pradesh
Mar-05-1954
Criminal
1955CriLJ476
District Magistrate of Morena for action prejudicial to the maintenance of public order Under Section 3(1) (a) (ii), Preventive Detention Act, 1950. With the exception of the petitioner Udaybhan Singh, all other applicants were arrested on 27-11-53, and the grounds … in the grounds of detention do not touch any of the matters covered by Section 3(1) (a) (ii), Preventive Detention Act, 1950; (iv) that the acts referred to in the grounds constitute offences under the Penal Code and could not,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarikisan Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Jan-09-1962
Criminal
(1962)64BOMLR522
necessary to detain him.Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred on me by Section 3(1)(a)(ii) of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, I, Dinkarrao Hanjatrao Deshmukh, I.A.S., District Magistrate, Nagpur, hereby direct that the said Shri Harikisan Kishorilal Agarwal be … of 1961Office of the District Magistrate, Nagpur, Dt. 10th April, 1961.Order of Detention under Section 3(1)(a)(ii) of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950.Whereas I am satisfied that it is necessary to prevent Shri Harikisan Kishorilal Agarwal of Nagpur from acting in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShyamal Chakraborty Vs. the Commissioner of Police, Calcutta and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-04-1969
Constitution
Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 7; Constitution of India - Article 32; Indian Penal Code
AIR1970SC269; (1969)2SCC426; [1970]1SCR762
is a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution by Shyamal Chakraborty who has been detained under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). Three grounds have been urged by the learned Counsel why we should … are being detained in pursuance of a detention order made under Sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 (Act IV of 1950) on the following grounds :You have been acting in a manner prejudicial to the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »